Automatic evaluation method and evaluation device for power distribution network project, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention is suitable for the technical field of project evaluation, and provides a power distribution network project automatic evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining project information of a to-be-evaluated single project, the project information comprising project and commissioning information; based on the project and the first mapping relation, determining the project category of the to-be-evaluated single project; based on the project category and the second mapping relationship, determining an evaluation system of the to-be-evaluated single project, the evaluation system including an evaluation index, an evaluation rule and an evaluation standard; configuring an evaluation system; based on the commissioning information, a user transformer restoration algorithm is adopted to determine associated transformer areas of the to-be-evaluated single project, and the associated transformer areas comprise an implementation transformer area, a problem transformer area and an influence transformer area; obtaining operation data of the to-be-evaluated single project based on the evaluation index, the evaluation rule and the associated transformer area; based on the evaluation rule, the evaluation standard and the operation data, the evaluation result of the to-be-evaluated single project is determined, and the power distribution network project evaluation efficiency and accuracy are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of project evaluation, and in particular to an automatic evaluation method, evaluation device, electronic equipment and storage medium for distribution network projects. Background Art

[0002] Carrying out project evaluation work is not only an objective requirement under the development trend of the market economy, but also an important means for enterprises to improve investment decision-making mechanisms, improve project investment results, and improve the level of investment project management.

[0003] Traditional project evaluation takes a unit as a whole and conducts a simple overall evaluation. The evaluation system is difficult to quantify the investment benefits of specific projects. In addition, due to the single evaluation method, the lack of a complete evaluation indicator system and standards, and insufficient digital support, the evaluation of each project mainly relies on manual work, and most manual assessments are qualitative analysis. There are problems such as strong subjective will in project evaluation, large workload, and long manual evaluation time limit, resulting in low accuracy and efficiency of project evaluation.

[0004] Therefore, how to improve the efficiency and accuracy of project evaluation has become an urgent problem to be solved. Summary of the invention

[0005] The embodiments of the present application provide a method for automatic evaluation of distribution network projects, an evaluation device, an electronic device and a storage medium, aiming to solve the problem of low efficiency and accuracy in the evaluation of single distribution network projects.

[0006] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an automatic evaluation method for distribution network projects, the method comprising: obtaining project information of a single project to be evaluated, the project information comprising project establishment and commissioning information; determining the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and a first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the first mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the establishment project and the project category; determining an evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated based on the project category and a second mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the second mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, the evaluation system comprising evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; configuring the evaluation system; determining the associated substations of the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, using a user variable restoration algorithm; automatically acquiring the operating data of the single project to be evaluated online based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single project to be evaluated; and automatically obtaining the evaluation results of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operating data of the single project to be evaluated.

[0007] In a possible implementation, configuring the evaluation system includes: configuring the evaluation indicators, configuring the evaluation rules, and configuring the evaluation standards; configuring the evaluation indicators includes: configuring the indicator name, number and acquisition method of the evaluation indicators; configuring the evaluation rules includes: configuring the calculation formula and scoring standard corresponding to the evaluation indicators; configuring the evaluation standards includes: combining indicators and allocating weights to the evaluation indicators.

[0008] In a possible implementation, the commissioning information includes the commissioning time of the single project to be evaluated, the pre-commissioning area information, the pre-commissioning user information, the pre-commissioning area information and the post-commissioning user information; the associated areas include the problem area, the implementation area and the affected area; the user change restoration algorithm is used to determine the associated areas of the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, including: based on the pre-commissioning area information, the pre-commissioning area information and the post-commissioning user information, the household change restoration algorithm is used to determine the implementation area and the first user set, the first user set including the users attached to the implementation area; based on the commissioning time, the pre-commissioning area information, the first user set and the preset time period, the household change restoration algorithm is used to determine the problem area; based on the problem area, the pre-commissioning user information and the first user set, a second user set is determined, the second user set including the users attached to the problem area before commissioning except the first user set; based on the second user set and the pre-commissioning area information, the affected area is determined.

[0009] In a possible implementation, the operating data of the single item to be evaluated is automatically obtained online based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single item to be evaluated, including: determining the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators based on the evaluation indicators; determining the calculation parameters based on the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators; and obtaining the operating data of the single item to be evaluated based on the calculation parameters and the associated substations.

[0010] In a possible implementation, the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated is automatically obtained based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operating data of the single item to be evaluated, including: determining the score of the single item to be evaluated in each of the evaluation indicators based on the operating data, and the calculation formula and scoring standard in the evaluation rules; determining the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated based on the indicator combination and weight allocation of the evaluation indicators in the evaluation standards, and the score of the single item to be evaluated in each of the evaluation indicators.

[0011] In a possible implementation, after automatically obtaining the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single project to be evaluated, the method also includes: generating an evaluation work order based on the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated; pushing the evaluation work order to the project leader of the single project to be evaluated; obtaining a feedback report of the single project to be evaluated, the feedback report including a verification report or rectification report of the single project to be evaluated.

[0012] In a possible implementation, the evaluation indicators include benefit evaluation indicators and process evaluation indicators; the benefit evaluation indicators include economic benefit analysis indicators, power supply capacity analysis indicators and equipment level analysis indicators, and the process evaluation indicators include timeliness analysis indicators, compliance analysis indicators and investment deviation rate analysis indicators; the economic benefit analysis indicators include substation line loss rate indicators and distribution transformer average load rate indicators; the power supply capacity analysis indicators include heavy load time reduction rate indicators, overload time reduction rate indicators, low voltage user reduction rate indicators, and low voltage total household days reduction rate indicators; the equipment level analysis indicators include three-phase unbalanced days indicators; the timeliness analysis indicators include feasibility study review timeliness indicators and material collection timeliness indicators; the compliance analysis indicators include feasibility study approval compliance indicators and contract signing compliance indicators; the investment deviation rate indicators include feasibility study estimate and approved budget deviation rate indicators and project initial design and completion scale deviation rate indicators.

[0013] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an automatic evaluation device for distribution network projects, the device comprising: a project information acquisition module, used to acquire project information of a single project to be evaluated, the project information including project establishment and commissioning information; a project category determination module, used to determine the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and a first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the first mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the establishment project and the project category; an evaluation system determination module, used to determine the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated based on the project category and the second mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the second mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, the evaluation system including evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; an evaluation system configuration module, used to configure the evaluation system; an associated substation determination module, used to determine the associated substation of the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated and using a user variable restoration algorithm; an operation data acquisition module, used to automatically acquire the operation data of the single project to be evaluated online based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single project to be evaluated; an evaluation result determination module, used to automatically obtain the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single project to be evaluated.

[0014] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the method described in the first aspect or any one of the implementation methods thereof is implemented.

[0015] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method described in the first aspect or any one of the implementation methods thereof is implemented.

[0016] In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method described in the first aspect or any one of the implementation methods thereof.

[0017] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present application have the following beneficial effects: based on the project establishment and the first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, determining the project category of the single project to be evaluated, the first mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the establishment project and the project category; based on the project category and the second mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, determining the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated, the second mapping relationship representing the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, the evaluation system including evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; automatically configuring the evaluation system; based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, adopting the user variable restoration algorithm, determining the associated substation of the single project to be evaluated; based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, automatically acquiring the operating data of the single project to be evaluated online; based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operating data of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtaining the evaluation results of the single project to be evaluated, effectively improving the efficiency and accuracy of the distribution network project evaluation.

[0018] It can be understood that the automatic evaluation device for distribution network projects, electronic device, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product provided in the embodiments of the present application have the same beneficial effects as the above-mentioned automatic evaluation method for distribution network projects, and will not be repeated here. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0020] Figure 1A schematic diagram of an automatic evaluation system for distribution network projects provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0021] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a method for automatically evaluating a distribution network project provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0022] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a household change restoration algorithm provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0023] Figure 4 A flowchart of another method for automatically evaluating a distribution network project provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0024] Figure 5 A structural block diagram of a distribution network project automatic evaluation device provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0025] Figure 6 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in one embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] In the following description, specific details such as specific system structures, technologies, etc. are provided for the purpose of illustration rather than limitation, so as to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the present application. However, it should be clear to those skilled in the art that the present application may also be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other cases, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, devices, circuits, and methods are omitted to prevent unnecessary details from obstructing the description of the present application.

[0027] It should be understood that when used in the present specification and the appended claims, the term "comprising" indicates the presence of described features, wholes, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, wholes, steps, operations, elements, components and / or combinations thereof.

[0028] It should also be understood that the term “and / or” used in the specification and appended claims refers to any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items, and includes these combinations.

[0029] As used in the specification and appended claims of this application, the term "if" can be interpreted as "when" or "uponce" or "in response to determining" or "in response to detecting", depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if [described condition or event] is detected" can be interpreted as meaning "uponce it is determined" or "in response to determining" or "uponce [described condition or event] is detected" or "in response to detecting [described condition or event]", depending on the context.

[0030] In addition, in the description of the present application specification and the appended claims, the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. are only used to distinguish the descriptions and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0031] References to "one embodiment" or "some embodiments" etc. described in the specification of this application mean that one or more embodiments of the present application include specific features, structures or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment. Therefore, the statements "in one embodiment", "in some embodiments", "in some other embodiments", "in some other embodiments", etc. that appear in different places in this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, but mean "one or more but not all embodiments", unless otherwise specifically emphasized in other ways. The terms "including", "comprising", "having" and their variations all mean "including but not limited to", unless otherwise specifically emphasized in other ways.

[0032] Carrying out investment evaluation work is not only an objective requirement under the development trend of the market economy, but also an important means for enterprises to improve investment decision-making mechanisms, improve project investment results, and improve the level of investment project management.

[0033] Influenced by the traditional planned power grid profit model and extensive power grid development mode, power grid investment relies on conventional and inertial investment decision-making models, which have problems such as cumbersome data acquisition, incomplete project benefit evaluation, and insufficient evaluation feedback. Therefore, how to transform the traditional extensive power grid development mode and investment management model, continuously save manpower and time costs, deepen the concept of precise investment, and optimize investment evaluation methods has become a realistic requirement for current power grid companies to implement the State Grid Corporation's concept of "precise investment, quality improvement and efficiency enhancement".

[0034] Traditional project investment evaluation takes a unit as a whole and conducts a simple overall evaluation. It does not set evaluation indicators for individual projects, and the evaluation system is difficult to quantify the investment benefits of specific projects. Secondly, due to the single evaluation method and insufficient digital support, the evaluation of each project is mainly completed manually, and most of the manual evaluation is qualitative analysis. There are problems such as strong subjective will in project evaluation, large workload, and long manual evaluation time limit, which leads to inaccurate evaluation feedback and the supervision of project effectiveness cannot keep up with the investment intensity. Therefore, in order to meet the increasingly sophisticated control of power grid projects under high investment and the urgent need to improve investment benefits, a new evaluation model with accurate data sources, comprehensive project evaluation indicators, and timely evaluation feedback is urgently needed, so as to effectively improve the company's project management and investment decision-making level and achieve the work goal of "precise investment, quality improvement and efficiency increase".

[0035] The existing distribution network project evaluation methods have the following main shortcomings: (1) Single evaluation method: Traditional distribution network project evaluation work relies on manual work. At a specific time each year, experts from cities or economic research institutes are selected to form a temporary evaluation team to conduct manual evaluation; (2) The evaluation scope is too narrow: Because it is a manual evaluation, the evaluation cannot cover all projects, and only a small number of projects can be selected for evaluation; (3) The evaluation criteria are not practical: There is no complete evaluation index system and standard as well as digital support. Some evaluation index data are difficult to obtain and are subjective; (4) The evaluation results are not closed-loop: There are no subsequent rectification measures after the project evaluation, and it is difficult to assist in optimizing investment decisions, and the evaluation results are difficult to implement.

[0036] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present application proposes an automatic evaluation method for distribution network projects, which obtains project information of a single project to be evaluated, the project information including project establishment and commissioning information; based on the project establishment and a first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, determines the project category of the single project to be evaluated, the first mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the establishment project and the project category; based on the project category and the second mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, determines the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated, the second mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, the evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; configures the evaluation system; based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, adopts a user variable restoration algorithm to determine the associated substation of the single project to be evaluated; based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtains the operating data of the single project to be evaluated online; based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operating data of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtains the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of the evaluation of the single project of the distribution network.

[0037] For ease of understanding, the technical solution of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0038] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of an automatic evaluation system for a distribution network project provided by an embodiment of the present application. Figure 1 As shown in the figure, the automatic evaluation system for distribution network projects includes the digitization of evaluation business, systematization of evaluation indicators, multidimensional evaluation application and digitization of evaluation means.

[0039] The digitization of evaluation business, including the automation of project evaluation work, the practical application of project evaluation results, and the work orderization of project evaluation models, adopts the "online service + offline verification + work order driven" method of automatic evaluation of distribution network infrastructure projects, creating a new model of single project evaluation that integrates industry and data, supports business, and empowers digital intelligence.

[0040] The evaluation indicators are systematized, specifically a single project evaluation indicator system, which includes process evaluation indicators and benefit evaluation indicators. The process rating indicators are timeliness analysis, compliance analysis, and investment deviation rate analysis; the benefit evaluation indicators are economic benefit analysis, power supply capacity analysis, and equipment level analysis, a total of 6 indicator systems.

[0041] The evaluation application is multidimensional, specifically the multidimensional application of evaluation results. Through accurate project evaluation, it can positively assist in optimizing investment decisions and provide reverse feedback on the accuracy of project approval review and the rationality of the plan.

[0042] The digitalization of evaluation means, specifically a project management sharing platform, relies on two foundations, four-layer configuration and three major functions. The two foundations are the business management system of the distribution network and the power grid big data platform; the four-layer configuration is data management, indicator management, standard management, and rule management; the three major functions include evaluation results, evaluation overview, and evaluation list, which realize the automatic storage of evaluation projects, automatic configuration of evaluation indicators, automatic acquisition of evaluation data, automatic generation of evaluation results, and automatic push of evaluation work orders.

[0043] Figure 2 This is a flow chart of a method for automatically evaluating a distribution network project provided by an embodiment of the present application. For ease of explanation, only the part related to the present embodiment is shown. The method provided by the present embodiment includes the following steps:

[0044] S210, obtaining project information of the single project to be evaluated, the project information including project establishment and operation information.

[0045] In the specific implementation, based on Figure 1 The distribution network project automatic evaluation system shown can realize the automatic storage of evaluation projects, and automatically judge according to the commissioning time of each distribution network single project. The project will automatically enter the evaluation library 13 months after it is put into operation, forming an evaluation project list, and query and display it in the project management sharing platform. In the project management platform, the project information of the single project to be evaluated can be obtained according to the project code or project name of the single project to be evaluated.

[0046] S220, determining the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and the first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, wherein the first mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project establishment and the project category.

[0047] In the specific implementation, firstly, the individual projects are allocated according to the establishment of the individual projects and the problems to be solved, and the first mapping relationship between the establishment of the individual projects and the project categories is set. Based on the establishment of the individual projects to be evaluated and the pre-set first mapping relationship, the project category of the individual projects to be evaluated can be automatically determined.

[0048] For example, projects established for substation engineering include solving substation overload problems, solving user low voltage problems, solving substation overload problems, high line loss management, improving the reliability of important users, renovating substations in old communities, converting specialized projects into public ones, standardizing grid construction, and distribution automation transformation; projects established for line engineering include solving 10 kV line overload problems, solving the "double hundred" problem of 10 kV lines, solving the low voltage problem of substation outlets, solving the high trip problem of 10 kV lines, solving the overload problem of 10 kV lines, and managing high line losses of 10 kV lines; business expansion projects include substation charging pile projects and line charging pile projects.

[0049] S230, determining an evaluation system for the single project to be evaluated based on the project category of the single project to be evaluated and the second mapping relationship, wherein the second mapping relationship represents a mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, and the evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards.

[0050] In the specific implementation, a corresponding evaluation system is set for each project category, and a second mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system is constructed. According to the project category of the individual project to be evaluated and the second mapping relationship, the evaluation system corresponding to the individual project to be evaluated can be automatically matched.

[0051] S240, configuration evaluation system.

[0052] In the specific implementation, after the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated is confirmed, the evaluation system is automatically configured for the single project to be evaluated.

[0053] S250, based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, a user variable restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the associated substation area of ​​the single project to be evaluated.

[0054] In the specific implementation, based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, the user variable restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, including the substation name, substation code and portfolio management system (PMS) code of each associated substation.

[0055] S260, based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and related substations of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtain the operation data of the single project to be evaluated online.

[0056] In the specific implementation, according to the information of the associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, the calculation parameters required for the evaluation indicators of the single project to be evaluated, such as the average load rate, the number of low voltage days, etc., are obtained from the source system such as the intelligent operation and maintenance platform and the one-substation-one-indicator system.

[0057] S270, automatically obtaining an evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single project to be evaluated.

[0058] In the specific implementation, calculations are performed based on the evaluation rules and evaluation standards in the configured evaluation system and the acquired operation data to automatically obtain the comprehensive score, benefit score and process score of the individual project to be evaluated, and the calculation formula and operation data corresponding to each evaluation indicator are displayed.

[0059] The technical solution provided by the present embodiment determines the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and the first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the first mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the establishment project and the project category; determines the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated based on the project category and the second mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, the second mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, the evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; automatically configures the evaluation system; based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, adopts the user variable restoration algorithm to determine the associated substation of the single project to be evaluated; based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtains the operating data of the single project to be evaluated online; based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operating data of the single project to be evaluated, automatically obtains the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated, effectively improving the efficiency and accuracy of the evaluation of single projects in the distribution network.

[0060] Based on the above embodiment, this embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, in this embodiment, the configuration evaluation system includes: configuration evaluation indicators, configuration evaluation rules and configuration evaluation standards;

[0061] The configuration evaluation index includes: the index name, number and acquisition method of the configuration evaluation index;

[0062] Configuration evaluation rules include: calculation formulas and scoring criteria corresponding to configuration evaluation indicators;

[0063] Configuring evaluation criteria includes: combining evaluation indicators and allocating weights.

[0064] In the specific implementation, the configuration evaluation indicators, configuration evaluation rules and configuration evaluation standards are all automatically configured. Among them, different process indicators and benefit indicators are set according to the project category of the single project to be evaluated, such as substation line loss rate, average load rate of distribution transformer, overload duration, low-voltage users, etc.; the calculation scope (time range and equipment range) and calculation logic of each evaluation indicator are defined; the scores of projects of the same type as the single project to be evaluated in each rating indicator in a preset area (for example, the whole province) are statistically calculated, and the weight distribution of each evaluation indicator is obtained according to the indicator pairs.

[0065] As an example, the evaluation indicators include benefit evaluation indicators and process evaluation indicators; the benefit evaluation indicators include economic benefit analysis indicators, power supply capacity analysis indicators and equipment level analysis indicators; the process evaluation indicators include timeliness analysis indicators, compliance analysis indicators and investment deviation rate analysis indicators.

[0066] The economic benefit analysis indicators include the substation line loss rate indicator and the distribution transformer average load rate indicator; the power supply capacity analysis indicators include the heavy load time reduction rate indicator, the overload time reduction rate indicator, the low voltage user reduction rate indicator and the low voltage total household days reduction rate indicator; the equipment level analysis indicators include the three-phase unbalanced days indicator; the timeliness analysis indicators include the feasibility study review timeliness indicator and the material collection timeliness indicator; the compliance analysis indicators include the feasibility study approval compliance indicator and the contract signing compliance indicator; the investment deviation rate indicators include the feasibility study estimate and approved budget deviation rate indicators and the project initial design and completion scale deviation rate indicators.

[0067] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the area line loss rate index model is:

[0068]

[0069] Among them, F represents the evaluation benefit score, K s1 is the annual power loss, K s2 The indicator score is calculated based on the conditions for the amount of electricity delivered throughout the year.

[0070] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the distribution transformer average load factor index model is:

[0071]

[0072] Among them, F represents the benefit score of the distribution transformer average load factor evaluation, K s For the annual power transmission, R kva is the transformer capacity, 8760 is the annual hours, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0073] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the overload duration reduction rate indicator model is:

[0074]

[0075] Among them, F represents the heavy load duration reduction rate score, T tcq T is the total time of heavy load in the whole year before production starts. tch It is the cumulative duration of heavy load throughout the year after production is put into operation, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0076] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the overload duration reduction rate indicator model is:

[0077]

[0078] Among them, F represents the overload duration reduction rate score, T tcq T is the cumulative overload duration for the whole year before commissioning. tch It is the cumulative overload duration throughout the year after commissioning, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0079] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the low voltage user reduction rate indicator model is:

[0080]

[0081] Among them, F represents the low voltage user reduction rate score, T tcq is the number of low voltage users in the whole year before commissioning, T tch It is the number of low-voltage users throughout the year after commissioning, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0082] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the indicator model for the reduction rate of the total number of days of low voltage for users is:

[0083]

[0084] Among them, F represents the score of the reduction rate of the total number of days of low voltage for users, T tcq T is the total number of days of low voltage for users in the whole year before commissioning, tch It is the total number of days of low voltage for users throughout the year after commissioning, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0085] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the three-phase unbalanced days index model is:

[0086]

[0087] Among them, F represents the three-phase unbalanced index score, d is the number of three-phase unbalanced days throughout the year, and the index score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0088] For example, the model formula of the feasibility study review timeliness indicator model is:

[0089]

[0090] Among them, T cb Indicates the storage time of the reserve, T xq Indicates the demand entry time, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0091] For example, the calculation formula of the material collection timeliness index model is:

[0092]

[0093] Among them, T kg Indicates the start time, T wzly Indicates the time when materials are collected, T jgIndicates the completion time, A wzly Indicates the amount of materials used, A pzgs Indicates approval of the budget estimate and calculation of indicator scores based on the conditions.

[0094] For example, the calculation formula of the feasibility study approval compliance indicator model is:

[0095]

[0096] Among them, T kyps Indicates the feasibility study review time, T kypf Indicates the feasibility study approval time, T csps Indicates the initial review time and calculates the indicator score based on the conditions.

[0097] Exemplarily, the calculation formula of the contract signing compliance indicator model is:

[0098]

[0099] Among them, T kg Indicates the start time, T htqd Indicates the time when the contract is signed, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0100] For example, the calculation formula of the feasibility study estimate and the approved budget deviation rate indicator model is:

[0101] (A pg -A ky ) / A ky

[0102] Among them, A pg Indicates approval of the estimated investment amount, A ky It indicates the feasibility study investment amount, and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0103] For example, the calculation formula of the project initial design and completion scale deviation rate indicator model is:

[0104] [1-0.2×(R jg -R cs ) / R cs -0.2×(T jg -T cs ) / T cs -0.2×(X jg -X cs ) / X cs -0.2×(L jg -L cs ) / L cs -0.2×(G jg -G cs ) / G cs ]×100%

[0105] Among them, R jg represents the completed distribution transformer capacity, R cs represents the initial distribution transformer capacity, T jg Indicates the number of completed distribution transformers, T cs Indicates the number of initially set distribution transformers, X jg Indicates the length of the 10kV completed line, X cs Indicates the initial design line length of 10kV, L jg Indicates the length of the 380V completed line, L cs Indicates the length of the initial 380V line, G jg represents the number of completed projects, G cs It indicates the number of initial projects and the indicator score is calculated based on the conditions.

[0106] The technical solution provided in this embodiment can realize automatic configuration of the evaluation system, and at the same time subdivide the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards in the evaluation system according to different project categories, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of the evaluation of single distribution network projects.

[0107] On the basis of the above embodiment, this embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, in this embodiment, the commissioning information includes the commissioning time of the single project to be evaluated, the pre-commissioning area information, the pre-commissioning user information, the post-commissioning area information and the post-commissioning user information; the associated areas include the problem areas, the implementation areas and the affected areas;

[0108] Based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, the user variable restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the associated substations of the single project to be evaluated, including:

[0109] Based on the pre-production area information, post-production area information and post-production user information, a user change restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the implementation area and the first user set, where the first user set includes users attached to the implementation area;

[0110] Based on the commissioning time, pre-production area information, the first user set and the preset time period, the user change restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the problem area;

[0111] Based on the problem area, the user information before production and the first user set, a second user set is determined, wherein the second user set includes users connected to the problem area before production except the first user set;

[0112] Based on the second user set and the post-production background area information, the affected area is determined.

[0113] In the specific implementation, Figure 3As shown, the red area is the problem area, the blue area is the implementation area, and the yellow area is the impact area. Through the area changes at the time of commissioning, such as the area information before commissioning, the area information after commissioning, and the user information after commissioning, the implementation area and the "household change relationship" after the implementation area is commissioned are found, that is, the user table data attached to the implementation area, that is, the first user set; according to the commissioning time of the implementation area, push forward 2 months, and restore the red area where the first user set was located 2 months ago through the "household change relationship", then the red area is the problem area. Among all the users in the red area, there may be other users other than the first user set, and these users are the second user set. After commissioning, the second user set is divided into other areas (not in the problem area and the implementation area), and these areas are the yellow impact areas. The problem area and the implementation area after commissioning are the main evaluation areas, and the impact area is the secondary evaluation area. By combining the data of the problem area, the implementation area, and the impact area after the project commissioning time, the effect after the project implementation can be obtained. By comparing the data before and after production, we can draw a comparison of the effects before and after the project implementation.

[0114] For example, by comparing the changes in user and substation files before and after the project is put into production, the substations newly added after the project is put into production and the substations affected by user changes are completed, and multiple changed substations after the project is put into production are obtained.

[0115] The technical solution provided in this embodiment is based on the relationship between the substation and the user before the project is put into operation, and then compares the changed substation and household use after the project is put into operation to obtain the impact substation of the substation after the project is put into operation. It is convenient to analyze and evaluate the problem solving of the substation and line before the project is put into operation, the situation affecting other substations and lines, and the power supply situation of the implementation substation and line, making the project evaluation more comprehensive and improving the accuracy of the project evaluation.

[0116] On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiment, this embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, in this embodiment, based on the evaluation index, evaluation rules and associated stations of the single project to be evaluated, the operation data of the single project to be evaluated is automatically obtained online, including:

[0117] Based on the evaluation index, an evaluation rule corresponding to the evaluation index is determined.

[0118] Based on the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators, the calculation parameters are determined.

[0119] Based on the calculation parameters and associated substations, the operating data of the individual project to be evaluated is obtained.

[0120] In the specific implementation, based on the evaluation indicators, the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators are determined, based on the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators, the calculation parameters are determined, and based on the calculation parameters, the operation data of the problem substation before production, as well as the operation data of the implementation substation and the affected substation after production are obtained.

[0121] The technical solution provided in this embodiment realizes the automatic acquisition of operation data and improves the efficiency of project evaluation.

[0122] On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiment, this embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, in this embodiment, based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single project to be evaluated, the evaluation results of the single project to be evaluated are automatically obtained, including:

[0123] Based on the operation data, as well as the calculation formula and scoring criteria in the evaluation rules, determine the scores of the individual project to be evaluated in each evaluation indicator;

[0124] The evaluation results of the individual project to be evaluated are determined based on the indicator combination and weight allocation of the evaluation indicators in the evaluation criteria, as well as the scores of the individual project to be evaluated in each evaluation indicator.

[0125] In the specific implementation, the comprehensive score, benefit score and process score of the single project to be evaluated are automatically obtained according to the evaluation rules and evaluation standards in the configured evaluation system and the obtained operation data. The calculation formula and operation data corresponding to each evaluation indicator are displayed, the situation of each indicator is analyzed, and the power grid situation before and after commissioning is compared to draw qualitative conclusions about the project.

[0126] The technical solution provided in this embodiment realizes the automatic generation of evaluation results, reduces the cost of manual intervention, and improves the efficiency and accuracy of project evaluation.

[0127] On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiment, this embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, in this embodiment, after automatically obtaining the evaluation result of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single project to be evaluated, it also includes:

[0128] Generate an evaluation work order based on the evaluation results of the single project to be evaluated;

[0129] Push the evaluation work order to the project leader of the single project to be evaluated;

[0130] Obtain feedback reports on individual projects to be evaluated, including verification reports or rectification reports on individual projects to be evaluated.

[0131] In the specific implementation, an evaluation work order is automatically generated according to the evaluation results and pushed to the project leader. The project leader uses the work order to view the project implementation process and the results after production, conducts on-site inspections of problem indicators, analyzes the causes of the problems, completes the preparation of the evaluation report, proposes rectification measures, completes the project rectification, and finally closes the evaluation loop.

[0132] As an example, after the project is automatically scored, it will be judged based on the score. If the score does not meet the standard, the system will automatically generate a work order and send it to the project unit for score confirmation and score appeal; offline verification and rectification, online retention of information: If the project unit has no objection to the substandard project score, the project will be verified and rectified, and verification reports, rectification reports and other documents will be prepared and uploaded to the system for archiving. Regular spot checks on rectification effects: The provincial company and the relevant departments of the Economic Research Institute will conduct regular spot checks on substandard projects in the system to understand the rectification situation.

[0133] The technical solution provided in this embodiment realizes the closed-loop management of distribution network project evaluation. According to the evaluation results, a work order for problem projects to be checked is automatically generated and pushed to the project leader. The project leader organizes on-site inspections, analyzes the causes of the problems, prepares inspection reports, clarifies rectification measures, and realizes the closed-loop evaluation of work orders.

[0134] Figure 4 A flowchart of another method for automatically evaluating a distribution network project provided in one embodiment of the present application. Figure 4 As shown, based on the above embodiments, the present embodiment further illustrates and optimizes the technical solution. Specifically, the method provided in the present embodiment includes: automatic storage of evaluation projects, project classification, setting of evaluation indicators according to project classification, automatic configuration of indicators, including indicator configuration, indicator rule configuration and evaluation standard configuration, determination of the substations associated with each project, automatic acquisition of operation data according to the substations, automatic scoring, work order distribution, offline verification and rectification, online retention of information, and regular spot checks on rectification effects.

[0135] It should be noted that Figure 4 The specific implementation methods of the steps shown can refer to the above embodiments, which will not be described again here.

[0136] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of a distribution network project automatic evaluation device provided by an embodiment of the present application. For the sake of convenience, only the parts related to the embodiment of the present application are shown. Figure 5 The distribution network project automatic evaluation device 500 may include a project information acquisition module 501, a project category determination module 502, an evaluation system determination module 503, an evaluation system configuration module 504, an associated substation determination module 505, an operation data acquisition module 506 and an evaluation result determination module 507.

[0137] The project information acquisition module 501 is used to acquire the project information of the single project to be evaluated, and the project information includes project establishment and operation information.

[0138] The project category determination module 502 is used to determine the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and the first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated. The first mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project establishment and the project category.

[0139] The evaluation system determination module 503 is used to determine the evaluation system of the single project to be evaluated based on the project category of the single project to be evaluated and the second mapping relationship. The second mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system. The evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards.

[0140] The evaluation system configuration module 504 is used to configure the evaluation system.

[0141] The associated substation area determination module 505 is used to determine the associated substation area of ​​the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated and adopt a user variable restoration algorithm.

[0142] The operation data acquisition module 506 is used to automatically acquire the operation data of the single project to be evaluated online based on the evaluation index, evaluation rules and associated stations of the single project to be evaluated.

[0143] The evaluation result determination module 507 is used to automatically obtain the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single item to be evaluated.

[0144] It should be noted that the information interaction, execution process, etc. between the above-mentioned devices / units are based on the same concept as the method embodiment of the present application. Their specific functions and technical effects can be found in the method embodiment part and will not be repeated here.

[0145] The technicians in the relevant field can clearly understand that for the convenience and simplicity of description, only the division of the above-mentioned functional units and modules is used as an example for illustration. In practical applications, the above-mentioned function allocation can be completed by different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units and modules in the embodiment can be integrated in a processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated in one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units. In addition, the specific names of the functional units and modules are only for the convenience of distinguishing each other, and are not used to limit the scope of protection of this application. The specific working process of the units and modules in the above-mentioned system can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment, which will not be repeated here.

[0146] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present application. Figure 6 As shown, the electronic device 6 of this embodiment includes: at least one processor 60 ( Figure 6 Only one is shown in the figure), a memory 61, and a computer program 62 stored in the memory 61 and executable on at least one processor 60, the processor 60 executes the computer program 62 to implement the above Figure 2 or Figure 4 The steps in the method embodiment, or the implementation of the above Figure 5 Functions of each module / unit in the device embodiment.

[0147] The electronic device 6 may be a computing device such as a desktop computer, a notebook, a PDA, or a cloud server. The electronic device 6 may include but is not limited to a processor 60 and a memory 61. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that Figure 6 It is only an example of the electronic device 6 and does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device 6. It may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or a combination of certain components, or different components. For example, it may also include input and output devices, network access devices, etc.

[0148] The processor 60 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc.

[0149] In some embodiments, the memory 61 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 6, such as a hard disk or memory of the electronic device 6. In other embodiments, the memory 61 may also be an external storage device of the electronic device 6, such as a plug-in hard disk, a smart media card (SMC), a secure digital (SD) card, a flash card, etc. equipped on the electronic device 6. Further, the memory 61 may also include both an internal storage unit and an external storage device of the electronic device 6. The memory 61 is used to store an operating system, an application program, a boot loader (BootLoader), data, and other programs, such as program codes of a computer program. The memory 61 may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.

[0150] The embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments can be implemented.

[0151] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the present application implements all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method, which can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the computer program can implement the steps of the above-mentioned various method embodiments when executed by the processor. Among them, the computer program includes computer program code, and the computer program code can be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form. The computer-readable medium may include at least: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code to an electronic device, a recording medium, a computer memory, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), an electric carrier signal, a telecommunication signal, and a software distribution medium. For example, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a disk or an optical disk.

[0152] A computer-readable storage medium provided in an embodiment of the present application has the same beneficial effects as the above-mentioned method for automatic evaluation of distribution network projects.

[0153] An embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments can be implemented.

[0154] A computer program product provided in an embodiment of the present application has the same beneficial effects as the above-mentioned method for automatic evaluation of distribution network projects.

[0155] In the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis. For parts that are not described or recorded in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0156] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered to be beyond the scope of this application.

[0157] In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices / electronic devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device / electronic device embodiments described above are merely schematic. For example, the division of the modules or units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0158] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0159] The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, rather than to limit them. Although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. These modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, and should all be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for automatic evaluation of distribution network projects, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtain project information of the single project to be evaluated, the project information including project establishment and operation information; Determine the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and a first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, wherein the first mapping relationship represents a mapping relationship between the project establishment and the project category; Determining an evaluation system for the single project to be evaluated based on the project category of the single project to be evaluated and the second mapping relationship, wherein the second mapping relationship represents a mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, and the evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; configuring the evaluation system; Based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated, the user variable restoration algorithm is adopted to determine the associated substation area of ​​the single project to be evaluated; Based on the evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and associated areas of the single project to be evaluated, the operation data of the single project to be evaluated is automatically obtained online; Based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single item to be evaluated, the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated is automatically obtained.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The configuring the evaluation system includes: configuring the evaluation index, configuring the evaluation rules, and configuring the evaluation standard; The configuring of the evaluation index includes: configuring the index name, number and acquisition method of the evaluation index; The configuring of the evaluation rules includes: configuring the calculation formula and scoring criteria corresponding to the evaluation indicators; The configuring of the evaluation criteria includes: combining the evaluation indicators and allocating weights to the evaluation indicators.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The commissioning information includes the commissioning time of the single project to be evaluated, pre-commissioning area information, pre-commissioning user information, post-commissioning area information and post-commissioning user information; the associated areas include problem areas, implementation areas and impact areas; The method of determining the associated substation area of ​​the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated and using a user variable restoration algorithm includes: Based on the pre-production area information, the post-production area information and the post-production user information, the household change restoration algorithm is used to determine the implementation area and the first user set, wherein the first user set includes users attached to the implementation area; Based on the commissioning time, the pre-commissioning area information, the first user set and the preset time period, the user change restoration algorithm is used to determine the problem area; Based on the problem station area, the pre-production user information and the first user set, determining a second user set, wherein the second user set includes users connected to the problem station area before production except for the first user set; Based on the second user set and the post-production background area information, the affected area is determined.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The automatic online acquisition of the operation data of the single project to be evaluated based on the evaluation index, evaluation rules and associated stations of the single project to be evaluated includes: Based on the evaluation indicator, determining an evaluation rule corresponding to the evaluation indicator; Determining calculation parameters based on the evaluation rules corresponding to the evaluation indicators; Based on the calculation parameters and the associated stations, the operation data of the single item to be evaluated is obtained.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The automatically obtaining the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single item to be evaluated includes: Based on the operation data, as well as the calculation formula and scoring criteria in the evaluation rules, determine the score of the single item to be evaluated in each of the evaluation indicators; Based on the indicator combination and weight distribution of the evaluation indicators in the evaluation standard, and the score of the single item to be evaluated in each of the evaluation indicators, the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated is determined.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After automatically obtaining the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single item to be evaluated, the method further includes: Generate an evaluation work order based on the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated; Pushing the evaluation work order to the project leader of the single project to be evaluated; Obtain a feedback report of the single project to be evaluated, wherein the feedback report includes a verification report or a rectification report of the single project to be evaluated.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include benefit evaluation indicators and process evaluation indicators; The benefit evaluation indicators include economic benefit analysis indicators, power supply capacity analysis indicators and equipment level analysis indicators; the process evaluation indicators include timeliness analysis indicators, compliance analysis indicators and investment deviation rate analysis indicators; The economic benefit analysis indicators include the substation line loss rate indicator and the distribution transformer average load rate indicator; the power supply capacity analysis indicators include the heavy load time reduction rate indicator, the overload time reduction rate indicator, the low voltage user reduction rate indicator and the low voltage total household days reduction rate indicator; the equipment level analysis indicators include the three-phase unbalanced days indicator; the timeliness analysis indicators include the feasibility study review timeliness indicator and the material collection timeliness indicator; the compliance analysis indicators include the feasibility study approval compliance indicator and the contract signing compliance indicator; the investment deviation rate indicators include the feasibility study estimate and approved budget deviation rate indicators and the project initial design and completion scale deviation rate indicators.

8. An automatic evaluation device for distribution network projects, characterized in that: The device comprises: A project information acquisition module, used to acquire project information of the single project to be evaluated, the project information including project establishment and operation information; A project category determination module, configured to determine the project category of the single project to be evaluated based on the project establishment and a first mapping relationship of the single project to be evaluated, wherein the first mapping relationship represents a mapping relationship between the project establishment and the project category; An evaluation system determination module, used to determine the evaluation system of the single entity project to be evaluated based on the project category of the single entity project to be evaluated and the second mapping relationship, wherein the second mapping relationship represents the mapping relationship between the project category and the evaluation system, and the evaluation system includes evaluation indicators, evaluation rules and evaluation standards; An evaluation system configuration module, used to configure the evaluation system; An associated substation area determination module is used to determine the associated substation area of ​​the single project to be evaluated based on the commissioning information of the single project to be evaluated and adopt a user variable restoration algorithm; An operation data acquisition module, used to automatically acquire the operation data of the single project to be evaluated online based on the evaluation index, evaluation rules and associated stations of the single project to be evaluated; The evaluation result determination module is used to automatically obtain the evaluation result of the single item to be evaluated based on the evaluation rules, evaluation standards and operation data of the single item to be evaluated.

9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

Images