Estimation of postings list length in a search system using an approximation table

US20110040761A1Inactive Publication Date: 2011-02-17GLOBALSPEC
51 Cites 8 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
US · United States
Current Assignee / Owner
Publication Date
2011-02-17
Estimated Expiration
Not applicable · inactive patent

Smart Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention provides a method of minimizing accesses to secondary storage when searching an inverted index for a search term. The method comprises automatically obtaining a predetermined size of a posting list for the search term, the predetermined size based on document frequency for the search term, wherein the posting list is stored in secondary storage, and reading at least a portion of the posting list into memory based on the predetermined size. Corresponding computer system and program products are also provided.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to the following U.S. Provisional Applications, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety:

[0002] Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61 / 233,411, by Flatland et al., entitled “ESTIMATION OF POSTINGS LIST LENGTH IN A SEARCH SYSTEM USING AN APPROXIMATION TABLE,” filed on Aug. 12, 2009; and

[0003] Provisional Patent Application No. 61 / 233,420, by Flatland et al., entitled “EFFICIENT BUFFERED READING WITH A PLUG IN FOR INPUT BUFFER SIZE DETERMINATION,” filed on Aug. 12, 2009;

[0004] Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61 / 233,427, by Flatland et al., entitled “SEGMENTING POSTINGS LIST READER,” filed on Aug. 12, 2009.

[0005] This application contains subject matter which is related to the subject matter of the following applications, each of which is assigned to the same assignee as this application and filed on the same day as this application. Each of the below listed ap...

Examples

case 1

imateReadSize<=bufsize

[0056]Build a two-stage predetermined buffer fill size strategy as indicated below in Table II.

TABLE IIStageFill SizeNumber of Times to Use1approximateReadSize128 kilobytesRepeat as necessary

[0057]The above two-stage strategy, when installed in an Enhanced Buffered Reader and used to read the posting list, will with high probability result in a single disk seek and read of exactly approximateReadSize bytes. As many supplemental 8 kilobyte reads as necessary may then be issued to handle the relatively rare case when the approximateReadSize is insufficient.

case 2

imateReadSize>bufsize

[0058]For this discussion, let “ / ” represent the operation of integer division, and “%” represent the operation of integer modulo.

[0059]In this case, we build a predetermined buffer fill size strategy that generally has three stages, as indicated in the following table. However, the second stage is not necessary when the bufsize divides the approximateReadSize evenly).

TABLE IIIStageFill SizeNumber of Times to Use1bufsizeapproximateReadSize / bufsize2approximateReadSize % bufsize138 kilobytesRepeat as necessary

[0060]The above strategy, when installed in an Enhanced Buffered Reader and used to read the posting list, will utilize the available input buffer of size bufsize bytes to read approximateReadSize bytes of data using a minimal number of disk seeks and minimal data transfer. The approximateReadSize is sufficient to read the entire posting list with high probability; however, as many supplemental 8 kilobyte reads as necessary will be issued to handle the relati...