Method, device and system for reviewing progress of nuclear power plant conventional island digital design model

Abstract

The application relates to a nuclear power plant conventional island digital design model progress review method, device and system, the method comprising the following steps: receiving three-dimensional model data sent by each design professional terminal; performing automatic collision checking according to the three-dimensional model data; and feeding back model checking results to the related design professional terminal, so that the arrangement cooperation between the professionals in the design process can be realized, the cooperation between the nuclear power plant conventional island model professionals in the design is improved, the design product quality is improved, the drawing progress and the construction progress are guaranteed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of nuclear power technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus and system for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant. Background Technology

[0002] The conventional island of a nuclear power plant is a collective term for the steam turbine generator units and their supporting facilities and structures within the plant. Traditionally, the design of the conventional island primarily combines two-dimensional and three-dimensional design methods. During three-dimensional design, each design discipline selects digital design software suitable for its specific characteristics, resulting in design data and models being stored in different digital design software. This leads to low interdisciplinary collaboration during the overall project design process. Improving the interdisciplinary design collaboration of the nuclear power plant conventional island model is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. Summary of the Invention

[0003] Therefore, it is necessary to provide a method, apparatus, system, and storage medium for reviewing the progress of digital design models for conventional islands in nuclear power plants, which can improve interdisciplinary design collaboration, in response to the above problems.

[0004] A method for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant, comprising:

[0005] Receive 3D model data sent from terminals of various design disciplines;

[0006] Automatic collision checks are performed based on the 3D model data, and the model verification results are fed back to the relevant design professional terminals. The model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design and generate 2D construction drawings for publication.

[0007] In one embodiment, after receiving the 3D model data sent by each design specialty terminal, the method further includes:

[0008] The model progress is reviewed based on the 3D model data, and the review comments are sent to the relevant design professional terminals.

[0009] In one embodiment, the automatic collision check based on the 3D model data includes: using a GPU in the background to calculate the relationship between facets, determining whether the 3D model data conforms to the set collision rules, storing entries that do not conform to the collision rules in the corresponding task flow, and automatically associating the relevant design disciplines and personnel information.

[0010] In one embodiment, the step of reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminal includes:

[0011] When the model is released after the equipment bidding process is completed in the design field, the first percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professional terminals.

[0012] When the model is released after the construction drawing progress has been completed according to the set schedule by the design professionals, a second percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professionals' terminals.

[0013] When the design professionals release the model after completing the construction drawing design, a third percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professionals' terminals; wherein, the first percentage is less than the second percentage, and the second percentage is less than the third percentage.

[0014] In one embodiment, after reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminal, the method further includes: releasing the adjusted model to the public.

[0015] A device for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant, comprising:

[0016] The data receiving module is used to receive 3D model data sent by terminals of various design disciplines;

[0017] The model verification module is used to perform automatic collision checks based on the 3D model data and feed back the model verification results to the relevant design professional terminals. The model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design and generate 2D construction drawings for publication.

[0018] In one embodiment, the device further includes:

[0019] The model progress review module is used to review the model progress based on the 3D model data and provide feedback on the review to the relevant design professional terminals.

[0020] A system for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant includes a design-specific terminal and a digital 3D collaborative platform. The digital 3D collaborative platform is used to review the progress of the digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant according to the method described above.

[0021] In one embodiment, the digital 3D collaborative platform has a multi-source data interface that receives and integrates 3D model data in formats such as vue, rvm, dgn, sat, stp, ifc, prt, CATPart, nwd, and fbx.

[0022] A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method described above.

[0023] The aforementioned method, device, and system for reviewing the progress of digital design models for conventional islands in nuclear power plants receive 3D model data sent by terminals of various design disciplines, perform automatic collision checks based on the 3D model data, and feed back the model verification results to the relevant design discipline terminals. This enables collaborative layout among disciplines during the design process, improves the collaborative design among disciplines in the conventional island model of nuclear power plants, enhances the quality of the design product, and ensures the progress of drawing production and construction. Attached Figure Description

[0024] Figure 1 A flowchart of a method for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant, as shown in one embodiment;

[0025] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the architecture of a digital design model progress review system for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant in one embodiment.

[0026] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the review principle of the model progress review module in one embodiment;

[0027] Figure 4 This is a structural block diagram of a digital design model progress review device for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant in one embodiment. Detailed Implementation

[0028] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this application clearer, the following detailed description is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of this application.

[0029] In the construction drawing design process of the conventional island of the Hualong One nuclear power plant, a combination of two-dimensional and three-dimensional design methods was mainly adopted. A digital 3D model of the conventional island was built on a computer using 3D digital design software, and then 2D drawings were generated according to established drawing rules before publication. During the construction drawing design phase, various disciplines used a variety of specialized digital 3D design software to build the 3D model of the conventional island. The degree of coordination among multiple disciplines in the 3D spatial layout, as well as the model building progress, will affect the professional drawing production schedule and the accuracy of the drawing information.

[0030] Currently, the design of the conventional island of the Hualong One nuclear power plant primarily employs a combination of two-dimensional and three-dimensional design methods. During the three-dimensional design phase, each design discipline selects digital design software suitable for its specific characteristics. Design data and deliverables (models) are stored in different digital design software programs. Simultaneously, raw design data, such as equipment models from equipment manufacturers, are also received. This objectively results in low interdisciplinary collaboration during the overall project design process. Furthermore, the dispersion of design deliverables (models) across multiple digital design software programs prevents timely and automatic collision checks, leading to drawing upgrades due to design oversights and even on-site construction rework.

[0031] Based on this, this application provides a method for reviewing the progress of digital design models for the conventional island of the Hualong One nuclear power plant. The method mainly includes a model verification module and a model progress review module. It integrates multi-disciplinary digital design models into a unified 3D collaborative platform. Relying on standardized model review rules, it controls the overall design progress of construction drawings and the model building progress. Through spatial occupancy and collision checks of the model, it performs reverse verification of the design's rationality, improving design accuracy while ensuring the progress of drawing production and on-site construction. By establishing unified and standardized model integration, verification, and review rules and processes, it improves the collaboration between different disciplines, enhances the quality of the final design, and ensures the progress of drawing production and construction.

[0032] In one embodiment, such as Figure 1 As shown, a method for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant includes:

[0033] Step S110: Receive 3D model data sent by terminals of various design disciplines.

[0034] Specifically, such as Figure 2 As shown, the platform can connect to various design specialty terminals to receive 3D model data. These terminals can be, but are not limited to, various personal computers, laptops, smartphones, tablets, IoT devices, and portable wearable devices. The digital 3D collaboration platform can be implemented using a dedicated server or a server cluster consisting of multiple servers. Each design specialty uses its specialized digital design software on its terminal to create construction drawings and then publishes the design results (3D model) data to the unified digital 3D collaboration platform.

[0035] Step S120: Perform automatic collision checks based on the 3D model data and send the model verification results back to the relevant design professional terminals.

[0036] The model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design, generating 2D construction drawings for publication. Specifically, the digital 3D collaborative platform has multi-source data interfaces, capable of receiving and integrating 3D model data in formats such as Vue, RVM, DGN, SAT, STP, IFC, PRT, CATPart, NWD, and FBX. This allows design results from various design software to be displayed on a unified platform, making the spatial positioning of each design element intuitive and visual. The digital 3D collaborative platform can perform automated and intelligent collision checks on the model and generate standardized collision check reports, feeding back the model verification results to the relevant design disciplines. The design disciplines then modify and adjust the construction drawing design based on the model verification results, ultimately generating 2D construction drawings for publication. Furthermore, the digital 3D collaborative platform can also automatically perform collision checks and design rationality verification on the model, providing the model verification results back to the relevant design disciplines.

[0037] In one embodiment, step S120, which involves automatic collision checking based on the 3D model data, includes: using a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) in the background to calculate the relationships between faces, determining whether the 3D model data conforms to the set collision rules, storing entries that do not conform to the collision rules in the corresponding task flow, and automatically associating them with the relevant design disciplines and personnel information. Further, the GPU can also be used to calculate the relationships between faces to determine whether the 3D model data conforms to the set collision rules or reasonableness rules. The model verification process involves first generating a task flow by customizing rules, automatically using the GPU in the background to calculate the relationships between faces, determining whether they conform to the collision rules or reasonableness rules, and then storing entries that do not conform to the rules in the corresponding task flow. This includes information about the 3D model objects, the collision points or locations that do not meet the reasonableness rules, and viewpoint snapshots, and automatically associating them with the relevant design disciplines and personnel information in the task flow.

[0038] In one embodiment, continue to refer to Figure 1 Following step S110, the method further includes step S130: reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminals. Step S130 can be performed after step S120 or simultaneously with step S120. Further, following step S130, the method also includes: publishing the adjusted model externally. Specifically, the completeness of the model can be reviewed according to the engineering construction progress nodes through a digital 3D collaborative platform to ensure that the model design progress is consistent with the construction drawing progress. Furthermore, the digital 3D collaborative platform can also publish the model as needed.

[0039] In one embodiment, step S130 includes: when the model is released after the equipment bidding process by the design professionals, a first percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professional terminal; when the model is released after the construction drawing progress has reached the set progress, a second percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professional terminal; when the model is released after the construction drawing design is completed by the design professionals, a third percentage of the model progress is reviewed based on the received 3D model data, and the review comments are fed back to the relevant design professional terminal. Wherein, the first percentage is less than the second percentage, and the second percentage is less than the third percentage. In this embodiment, the first percentage, the second percentage, and the third percentage are 30%, 60%, and 90%, respectively.

[0040] Specifically, such as Figure 3 As shown, the model progress review is mainly divided into three stages: 30% model progress review, 60% model progress review, and 90% model progress review.

[0041] Phase 1: After each discipline completes the bidding for major equipment, the equipment models are published to the digital 3D collaborative platform, and the models are spatially positioned according to the layout plan. The digital 3D collaborative platform conducts a 30% progress review of the models and provides feedback to the relevant design disciplines.

[0042] Phase Two: Each design discipline will conduct construction drawing design, simultaneously publishing the design model on the digital 3D collaborative platform to meet the construction drawing schedule, and revising and improving the model based on the review comments from Phase One. When the construction drawing schedule is 80% complete, the digital 3D collaborative platform will conduct a 60% model progress review and provide feedback to the relevant design disciplines.

[0043] Phase Three: Upon completion of the construction drawings, all disciplines will simultaneously deploy the 3D model on the digital 3D layout platform according to the design schedule. Simultaneously, the model will be modified and improved based on the on-site modification notices from the construction drawing phase. The digital 3D collaborative platform will conduct a 90% model progress review, relying on all construction drawings and design modification opinions from on-site modification notices. The review opinions will be fed back to the relevant design disciplines for adjustments, modifications, and supplements. Finally, the model will be released externally.

[0044] The review process at each stage is as follows: Reviewers initiate review tasks in stages on the digital 3D collaborative platform according to the model's progress of 30%, 60%, and 90%. The platform automatically sends review notification emails to all disciplines, and each design discipline completes the uploading and positioning of its relevant models before the required deadlines. Then, reviewers use the collision rules and design rationality rules set in the model verification module to conduct semi-automatic checks on the model's completeness, accuracy, and uniqueness, and provide feedback to the relevant design disciplines.

[0045] During the digital design process of the conventional island of the Hualong One nuclear power plant, various design disciplines use digital design software more suited to their specific characteristics for design calculations and 3D model design. These design models are scattered across multiple digital design software programs. The method for reviewing the progress of digital design models for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant provided in this application integrates the 3D models of various disciplines into a unified 3D collaborative platform. This enables interdisciplinary layout collaboration during the design process, allowing design engineers to have a holistic and intuitive understanding of the conventional island layout in 3D space.

[0046] Furthermore, during the design process, various external factors can cause a mismatch between model building and drawing production schedules, or even severe delays in model building, making it difficult for the model to effectively verify the design. The aforementioned model progress review method can monitor and track the synchronous model building progress during the design process, enabling the model to guide modeling synchronously with the drawings, and for the model to simultaneously verify the drawings. This improves the quality of published drawings, reduces rework caused by design oversights during on-site construction, and saves construction costs.

[0047] It should be understood that although the steps in the flowcharts of the embodiments described above are shown sequentially according to the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in the order indicated by the arrows. Unless explicitly stated herein, there is no strict order restriction on the execution of these steps, and they can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least some steps in the flowcharts of the embodiments described above may include multiple steps or multiple stages. These steps or stages are not necessarily completed at the same time, but can be executed at different times. The execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily sequential, but can be performed alternately or in turn with other steps or at least some of the steps or stages of other steps.

[0048] Based on the same inventive concept, this application also provides a device for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for a conventional island of a nuclear power plant, which is used to implement the aforementioned method for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for a conventional island of a nuclear power plant. The solution provided by this device is similar to the solution described in the above method. Therefore, the specific limitations in one or more embodiments of the device for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for a conventional island of a nuclear power plant provided below can be found in the limitations of the method for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for a conventional island of a nuclear power plant described above, and will not be repeated here.

[0049] In one embodiment, such as Figure 4 As shown, a device for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant is provided, comprising: a data receiving module 110 and a model verification module 120, wherein:

[0050] The data receiving module 110 is used to receive 3D model data sent by terminals of various design disciplines.

[0051] The model verification module 120 is used to perform automatic collision checks based on the 3D model data and feed back the model verification results to the relevant design professional terminals. The model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design and generate 2D construction drawings for publication.

[0052] In one embodiment, the model verification module 120 uses the GPU in the background to calculate the relationship between the facets, determines whether the 3D model data conforms to the set collision rules, stores the entries that do not conform to the collision rules in the corresponding task flow, and automatically associates the relevant design profession and personnel information.

[0053] In one embodiment, the device further includes a model progress review module 130, used to review the model progress based on the 3D model data and provide feedback on the review to the relevant design professional terminal.

[0054] In one embodiment, when the model is released after the equipment bidding process by the design profession, the model progress review module 130 performs a first percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback on the review to the relevant design profession terminal; when the model is released after the construction drawing progress has been completed and the set progress has been achieved by the design profession, the module performs a second percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback on the review to the relevant design profession terminal; when the model is released after the construction drawing design is completed by the design profession, the module performs a third percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback on the review to the relevant design profession terminal; wherein the first percentage is less than the second percentage, and the second percentage is less than the third percentage.

[0055] In one embodiment, the model progress review module 130 releases the adjusted model to the public.

[0056] Each module in the aforementioned digital design model progress review device for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant can be implemented entirely or partially through software, hardware, or a combination thereof. These modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in a computer device, or stored in the memory of a computer device as software, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each module.

[0057] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the method described above.

[0058] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the above-described method.

[0059] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method described above.

[0060] In one embodiment, a system for reviewing the progress of a digital design model for the conventional island of a nuclear power plant is provided, including a design-specific terminal and a digital 3D collaborative platform. The digital 3D collaborative platform is used to review the progress of the digital design model for the conventional island of the nuclear power plant according to the method described above. The digital 3D collaborative platform has multi-source data interfaces and can receive and integrate 3D model data in formats such as vue, rvm, dgn, sat, stp, ifc, prt, CATPart, nwd, and fbx.

[0061] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by a computer program instructing related hardware. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above methods. Any references to memory, databases, or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can take many forms, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) or Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM). The databases involved in the embodiments provided in this application may include at least one type of relational database and non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include, but are not limited to, blockchain-based distributed databases. The processors involved in the embodiments provided in this application may be general-purpose processors, central processing units, graphics processing units, digital signal processors, programmable logic devices, quantum computing-based data processing logic devices, etc., and are not limited to these.

[0062] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined in any way. For the sake of brevity, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0063] The embodiments described above are merely illustrative of several implementation methods of this application, and while the descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention patent. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can make various modifications and improvements without departing from the concept of this application, and these all fall within the protection scope of this application. Therefore, the protection scope of this patent application should be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A nuclear power plant conventional island digital design model progress review method, characterized in that, include: Receive 3D model data sent from terminals of various design disciplines; Automatic collision checks are performed based on the 3D model data, and the model verification results are fed back to the relevant design professional terminals; the model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design, and generate 2D construction drawings for publication; After receiving the 3D model data sent by each design professional terminal, the method further includes: reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback on the review to the relevant design professional terminals. The step of reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminals includes: when the design professionals release the model after the equipment bidding process is completed, conducting a first percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminals; when the design professionals release the model after the construction drawing progress has reached the set progress, conducting a second percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminals; and when the design professionals release the model after the construction drawing design is completed, conducting a third percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professional terminals; wherein the first percentage is less than the second percentage, and the second percentage is less than the third percentage.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein, The automatic collision check based on the 3D model data includes: using the GPU in the background to calculate the relationship between the faces, determining whether the 3D model data conforms to the set collision rules, storing entries that do not conform to the collision rules in the corresponding task flow, and automatically associating the relevant design disciplines and personnel information.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, After reviewing the model progress based on the 3D model data and providing feedback to the relevant design professionals, the process also includes: releasing the adjusted model to the public.

4. A nuclear power plant conventional island digital design model progress review device, characterized by, include: The data receiving module is used to receive 3D model data sent by terminals of various design disciplines; The model verification module is used to automatically perform collision checks based on the 3D model data and feed back the model verification results to the relevant design professional terminals; the model verification results are used to modify and adjust the construction drawing design and generate 2D construction drawings for publication; The model progress review module is used to review the model progress based on the 3D model data and provide feedback to the relevant design professional terminals. When the model is released after the equipment bidding process by the design professionals, the module performs a first percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback to the relevant design professional terminals. When the model is released after the construction drawing progress has reached the set progress, the module performs a second percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback to the relevant design professional terminals. When the model is released upon completion of the construction drawing design, the module performs a third percentage review of the model progress based on the received 3D model data and provides feedback to the relevant design professional terminals. The first percentage is less than the second percentage, and the second percentage is less than the third percentage.

5. A nuclear power conventional island digital design model progress review system, characterized in that, It includes a design professional terminal and a digital 3D collaborative platform, wherein the digital 3D collaborative platform is used for reviewing the progress of the digital design model of the conventional island of a nuclear power plant according to any one of claims 1 to 3.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein, The digital 3D collaborative platform has multi-source data interfaces, which can receive and integrate 3D model data in formats such as vue, rvm, dgn, sat, stp, ifc, prt, CATPart, nwd, and fbx.

7. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3.

Images