Method for realizing continuation of double-layer equivalent source of magnetic field

Abstract

The invention provides a method for realizing continuation of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field, relates to the technical field of electromagnetic field control and adjustment, and can more accurately simulate magnetic field distribution in an actual application scene through detailed shape and position determination steps. Therefore, it can be ensured that the designed double-layer equivalent source can show good performance under various working conditions, when the magnetic parameters are calculated, the complexity of the magnetic field source and the influence of the actual working environment are comprehensively considered, and the magnetic field characteristics of the magnetic field source can be predicted more accurately. In this way, design adjustment and recalculation caused by inaccurate parameters in the subsequent stage can be avoided, and refined adjustment can be carried out according to the result of numerical calculation or experimental verification in the adjustment and optimization stage. The iterative optimization process can significantly improve the design performance of the double-layer equivalent source, maximizes the benefits of the double-layer equivalent source, analyzes the technical benefits of the design scheme and predicts the future development direction, and facilitates the evaluation of the feasibility of the design in technology and business.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of electromagnetic field control and regulation, and more specifically, particularly relates to a method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field. Background Art

[0002] Traditionally, in many electromagnetic applications, complex magnetic field distributions need to be accurately controlled and simulated. Traditional methods usually involve using a single magnetic field source or a simplified model for magnetic field simulation and design. However, these methods have certain limitations when dealing with complex scenarios and nonlinear effects. For example, in medical imaging, magnetic resonance equipment and other high-precision applications, the requirements for precise control and regulation of magnetic fields are becoming increasingly stringent;

[0003] There are some technologies for magnetic field simulation and control, including traditional numerical methods and some equivalent source-based methods developed in recent years. However, the applicability and accuracy of these technologies in complex scenarios still face challenges, especially when multiple factors and nonlinear effects need to be considered comprehensively;

[0004] Therefore, it is necessary to propose a new extension method for the double-layer equivalent source of the magnetic field. By comprehensively considering factors such as position, shape and magnetic parameters, appropriate extension methods are selected, adjustments and optimizations are made, and technical benefit analysis and future development direction predictions are carried out to improve the precise control capabilities and application potential of complex magnetic field environments. Despite the existence of the above-mentioned technologies, a more comprehensive and precise method is still needed to address the limitations of existing technologies in order to improve the practicality and effectiveness of magnetic field control technology in various applications. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field to solve the above problems.

[0006] A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field comprises the following steps:

[0007] S1: Conduct literature research and technical background analysis;

[0008] S2: Determine the position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source;

[0009] S3: Calculate the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source;

[0010] S4: Select appropriate extension method;

[0011] S5: Perform numerical calculations or experimental verification;

[0012] S6: Adjustment and optimization;

[0013] S7: Conduct technical benefit analysis of the design solution;

[0014] S8: Description of implementation details and engineering realization;

[0015] S9: Prediction of future development direction and application potential;

[0016] S10: Technology verification and application demonstration.

[0017] Preferably, in S2, the method for determining the position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source includes using a magnetic field sensor to measure the magnetic field distribution in an actual scene, and then determining the optimal position and optimal shape of the double-layer equivalent source in space to minimize the long-distance magnetic field attenuation effect.

[0018] Preferably, in S3, the method for calculating the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source includes accurately calculating the magnetic dipole moment and the direction of the magnetic axis of the double-layer equivalent source based on measurement data or numerical simulation results to ensure its accuracy and stability in a complex magnetic field environment.

[0019] Preferably, in S4, an appropriate extension method is selected, wherein the extension method includes a point dipole model, a surface dipole model or a combination thereof according to the magnetic field characteristics of the actual scene, so as to ensure the wide applicability and effect advantages of the proposed double-layer equivalent source in different environments.

[0020] Preferably, in S5, a method of numerical calculation or experimental verification is performed, which includes using advanced numerical simulation software or a customized experimental platform to verify the accuracy and effect of the selected continuation method on the double-layer equivalent source magnetic field distribution, and provide a detailed data analysis report.

[0021] Preferably, in S6, the method for adjusting and optimizing the double-layer equivalent source includes adjusting the structural parameters, material selection or magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source according to numerical calculation or experimental verification results to optimize its energy efficiency and stability in long-distance magnetic field transmission.

[0022] Preferably, in S7, a method for technical benefit analysis of the design scheme is performed, which includes a comparative analysis of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method with the existing technology, and a detailed evaluation of its advantages and room for improvement in terms of magnetic field control, cost-effectiveness and environmental adaptability.

[0023] Preferably, in S8, the description method of implementation details and engineering realization includes a detailed description of the specific steps and technical details of implementing the proposed method, such as the configuration of the magnetic field measurement device, the data processing algorithm and the engineering implementation process of its practicality verification.

[0024] Preferably, in S9, a method for predicting future development directions and application potentials includes exploring the potential applications of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method in new technology fields, such as electromagnetic isolation technology, magnetic field guidance systems, and application prospects in medical imaging equipment.

[0025] Preferably, in S10, the method of technology verification and application demonstration, including field testing and application demonstration in actual scenarios, proves the actual effect and stability of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method in complex environments, and provides technical support for its commercialization and market promotion.

[0026] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0027] In the present invention, a systematic and scientific methodology ensures that each key factor is systematically considered and processed during the design process through clearly defined steps (such as literature research, parameter calculation, verification, etc.). This systematic approach helps reduce uncertainty in the design and improves the efficiency and accuracy of the design.

[0028] In the present invention, more precise position and shape determination can more accurately simulate the magnetic field distribution in actual application scenarios through detailed shape and position determination steps. This helps to ensure that the designed double-layer equivalent source can show good performance under various working conditions.

[0029] In the present invention, the magnetic parameters are comprehensively considered. When calculating the magnetic parameters, the complexity of the magnetic field source and the influence of the actual working environment are comprehensively considered, so that the magnetic field characteristics can be predicted more accurately. This helps to avoid design adjustments and recalculations caused by inaccurate parameters in subsequent stages.

[0030] In the present invention, the opportunity for optimization and adjustment can be refined according to the results of numerical calculation or experimental verification during the adjustment and optimization stage. This iterative optimization process can significantly improve the design performance of the double-layer equivalent source and maximize its benefits.

[0031] In this invention, technical benefit analysis and future development forecast, the technical benefit analysis of the design scheme and the forecast of future development direction are carried out to help evaluate the technical and commercial feasibility of the design. This comprehensive analysis can provide strategic direction for the long-term development of the project and lay the foundation for further technical improvement and market application.

[0032] In the present invention, the detailed description of implementation and engineering realization describes in detail how to implement the design scheme into the actual project in the implementation details and engineering realization description stage, so as to ensure that the design concept can be smoothly transformed into an actual product or application. This detailed description helps to eliminate misunderstandings or problems that may arise during the implementation process. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the process of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] The following embodiments of the present invention are described in further detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and examples. The following examples are used to illustrate the present invention, but are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.

[0035] See also Figure 1 The present invention provides a method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field, comprising the following steps:

[0036] S1: Conduct literature research and technical background analysis;

[0037] S2: Determine the position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source;

[0038] S3: Calculate the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source;

[0039] S4: Select appropriate extension method;

[0040] S5: Perform numerical calculations or experimental verification;

[0041] S6: Adjustment and optimization;

[0042] S7: Conduct technical benefit analysis of the design solution;

[0043] S8: Description of implementation details and engineering realization;

[0044] S9: Prediction of future development direction and application potential;

[0045] S10: Technology verification and application demonstration.

[0046] The purpose of S1 is to fully understand the existing technologies, research results and existing problems in the current field. The following are the details and steps included in the S1 stage:

[0047] Domain definition and background introduction: Determine the technical field and specific application background of the method, introduce relevant terms and definitions, and ensure understanding of the terminology and standard concepts in this field;

[0048] Literature collection and organization: Collect and organize existing literature, patent documents and technical reports related to the double-layer equivalent source, and systematically search relevant literature databases (such as IEEE Xplor, Google Scholar, etc.) and patent databases (such as WIPO, USPTO, etc.) to ensure that comprehensive background information is obtained;

[0049] Technology and market status analysis: Analyze the status and development trends of similar technologies or products in the current market, gain in-depth understanding of competitors’ technical solutions and existing patents, and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages and their market position;

[0050] Identification of problems and challenges: Identify the problems, challenges and limitations in current technologies or markets, analyze specific problems that are difficult to solve with existing technologies, and provide a basis for the innovation of new technologies;

[0051] Technology development trend analysis: Explore the future development direction and trend of related technologies, predict emerging technologies and market opportunities, especially the innovation trends related to magnetic field control and transmission;

[0052] Intellectual property analysis: Analyze existing patents and intellectual property rights in relevant technical fields to identify possible patent infringement risks and technical feasibility;

[0053] Goal setting and theoretical basis: Based on the results of the literature survey, set the specific technical goals of this method and establish the theoretical basis and key technical requirements needed to achieve these goals.

[0054] The specific content and steps of the S2 phase cover the following aspects:

[0055] Scene measurement and data collection: Use magnetic field sensors or other measuring equipment to measure magnetic fields in actual scenes, ensuring that the measurements cover all key areas and distances to obtain detailed magnetic field distribution data;

[0056] Magnetic field analysis and processing: Analyze and process the measured magnetic field data, including data cleaning, filtering and correction, to determine the intensity, direction and change law of the magnetic field for subsequent double-layer equivalent source design and calculation;

[0057] Determination of the shape and position of the double-layer equivalent source: Based on the magnetic field measurement results, the optimal position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source in space are determined. Taking into account the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field distribution and the actual application requirements, the arrangement of the double-layer equivalent source is optimized to maximize its effectiveness.

[0058] Shape design and parameter adjustment: Design the geometric shape of the double-layer equivalent source, such as considering the use of point dipoles, surface dipoles or other suitable shapes, and adjust the shape parameters of the double-layer equivalent source, such as size, proportion and layout, according to the actual magnetic field characteristics and target effects;

[0059] Establish initial model and preliminary verification: Establish a preliminary double-layer equivalent source model and conduct basic numerical simulation or experimental verification to ensure that the initial design meets the basic magnetic field control requirements and provide basic data for subsequent detailed design and optimization;

[0060] Reference to existing technologies and previous research: Reference to relevant technologies and previous research results collected in the literature survey to ensure the cutting-edge and innovative nature of the double-layer equivalent source design, and draw on successful cases and best practices to provide a basis for decision-making in the design process.

[0061] The S3 stage involves calculating the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source. The specific content and steps are as follows:

[0062] Magnetic parameter definition: Determine the magnetic parameters required for the double-layer equivalent source, such as magnetic moment strength, direction, bias, etc., and define the magnetic characteristics of each layer, including parameter requirements and restrictions for the inner and outer layers;

[0063] Magnetic model establishment: Establish a magnetic model of a double-layer equivalent source, usually including mathematical equations or computational models, to describe the magnetic field generation mechanism and effect of each layer, and determine the magnetic response relationship between the inner and outer layers for subsequent numerical calculations and experimental verification;

[0064] Numerical calculation method: Select appropriate numerical calculation method, such as finite element analysis, finite difference method or other numerical simulation technology, design calculation model to simulate the magnetic field characteristics of double-layer equivalent source under different working conditions, and calculate the required magnetic parameters;

[0065] Experimental parameter acquisition: Experimental verification is performed to obtain actual magnetic parameter data to ensure that the experimental equipment and conditions can accurately measure and verify the magnetic response of the double-layer equivalent source;

[0066] Parameter optimization and adjustment: According to the calculation results or experimental data, the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source are optimized and adjusted, and the magnetic moment strength, direction or interaction between layers are adjusted to improve its performance and stability;

[0067] Model verification: Verify whether the calculation model or experimental results are consistent with the expected magnetic parameters, ensure the accuracy and reliability of the magnetic field model and magnetic parameters, and provide a basis for subsequent design and analysis.

[0068] The specific content and steps of the S4 stage mainly involve selecting an appropriate extension method. The following are the detailed content and steps:

[0069] Analysis of existing continuation methods: Review and analyze existing magnetic field equivalent source continuation methods, including theoretical models and practical application cases, and evaluate the advantages and limitations of these methods in specific scenarios, as well as their applicability and efficiency;

[0070] Adapt to the special requirements of the double-layer equivalent source: determine the special requirements of the double-layer equivalent source, such as complex magnetic field structure, specific magnetic parameter requirements, etc., and determine which continuation method can better meet these requirements, such as maintaining the accuracy of the magnetic field distribution or improving the calculation efficiency;

[0071] Numerical simulation and verification selection: Select numerical calculation methods and determine appropriate numerical simulation techniques, such as finite element method, finite difference method, boundary element method, etc., to ensure that the selected numerical method can effectively simulate the magnetic field characteristics of the double-layer equivalent source and take into account the actual availability of computing resources and time;

[0072] Selection of experimental verification methods: Select the experimental verification method, determine the experimental plan and the required experimental equipment, and ensure that the experiment can accurately verify the effectiveness of the continuation method and the performance of the double-layer equivalent source, taking into account the experimental cost and feasibility;

[0073] Model verification and effect evaluation: Verify whether the selected continuation method can accurately reproduce the magnetic field behavior of the double-layer equivalent source, conduct a preliminary evaluation, and compare the calculation accuracy, model complexity, and implementation difficulty of different methods;

[0074] Optimization and adjustment scheme: Adjust the selected continuation method to optimize the magnetic field simulation effect or experimental verification result of the double-layer equivalent source, and ensure that the final selected continuation method can work stably and reliably in practical applications.

[0075] The S5 stage mainly involves numerical calculations or experimental verification to verify the performance and effect of the designed double-layer equivalent source in simulation or actual application. The following are the details and steps included in the S5 stage:

[0076] Numerical calculation preparation: prepare the computing environment and software tools required for numerical calculation, such as finite element analysis software or custom calculation code, to ensure that the calculation model can accurately describe the magnetic field characteristics of the double-layer equivalent source, and adjust the model parameters and boundary conditions according to actual needs;

[0077] Model establishment and initialization: Establish a numerical model of the double-layer equivalent source, including its position, shape and magnetic parameters, and initialize the initial conditions and parameters of the model for numerical calculation;

[0078] Numerical calculation process: Run the numerical calculation program to simulate the magnetic field distribution and effect of the double-layer equivalent source under different working conditions, ensuring that all physical factors and constraints are taken into account in the calculation process, such as the influence of the surrounding environment and various situations that may be encountered in practical applications;

[0079] Result analysis and evaluation: Analyze the results obtained from numerical calculations, including magnetic field distribution, magnetic flux density, field strength and other parameters, compare the calculation results with the expected design goals, and determine the accuracy and reliability of the model;

[0080] Experimental verification preparation: Conduct experimental verification, prepare the equipment and materials required for the experiment, ensure that the actual magnetic field behavior of the double-layer equivalent source can be accurately measured and recorded, and determine the specific plan and steps of the experiment, including test conditions, data acquisition and analysis methods;

[0081] Experiment execution and data collection: Perform experiments according to the experimental plan, record and collect actual magnetic field data, ensure data accuracy and stability of experimental conditions during the experiment, so as to ensure the reliability of the results;

[0082] Result analysis and comparison: Compare the results of numerical calculation and experimental verification, evaluate their consistency and differences, analyze whether the experimental results are consistent with the expected numerical simulation results, and find possible deviations or optimization space;

[0083] Conclusions and recommendations: Based on the results of numerical calculations and experimental verification, conclusions are drawn about the performance and effectiveness of the double-layer equivalent source, and recommendations for further optimization or adjustment are put forward to improve the design scheme or enhance the performance of the double-layer equivalent source.

[0084] The S6 phase mainly involves adjusting and optimizing the design to ensure that the double-layer equivalent source can achieve the expected performance and effect. The following are the details and steps included in the S6 phase:

[0085] Analyze the results of numerical calculations or experimental verification: Analyze the results of numerical calculations or experimental verifications performed in the S5 stage in detail, and check for problems or deficiencies found in the calculations or experiments, such as magnetic field distribution or effects that do not match theoretical expectations;

[0086] Identify and solve problems: Based on the analysis results, identify possible design defects or optimization space, and determine the specific aspects that need to be optimized, such as magnetic field strength, uniformity, directionality, etc.;

[0087] Parameter adjustment and model optimization: Adjust the key parameters of the double-layer equivalent source, such as magnetic moment strength, shape, position, etc., to improve its performance, use numerical simulation tools to optimize the design, or adjust the actual device according to experimental results;

[0088] Improve the design: Update the design of the double-layer equivalent source based on the optimized parameters and models to ensure that the new design can better meet the expected magnetic field requirements or experimental verification goals;

[0089] Verify optimization results: Run updated numerical simulations or re-perform experimental verification to verify the effect of the optimized design, compare the results before and after optimization, and evaluate the improved performance and stability;

[0090] Record and document: record all adjustment and optimization processes, including parameter changes, model updates, etc., and document the key information and results of the optimization design for subsequent analysis and application reference;

[0091] Feedback and discussion: Discuss the results and feedback of the optimized design with the team or relevant experts, obtain opinions and suggestions, and further improve and perfect the design of the double-layer equivalent source.

[0092] The S7 stage mainly involves the technical benefit analysis of the design scheme to evaluate the technical performance and economic benefits of the double-layer equivalent source in practical applications. The following are the details and steps included in the S7 stage:

[0093] Performance evaluation: Analyze the main performance indicators of the double-layer equivalent source under design conditions, such as magnetic field intensity, directivity, uniformity, etc., and compare the degree of compliance of these performance indicators with the design goals or requirements;

[0094] Efficiency and energy consumption analysis: Evaluate the energy consumption of the double-layer equivalent source, including power consumption, current demand, etc., and analyze its efficiency in practical applications, such as magnetic field generation efficiency or energy utilization efficiency;

[0095] Cost-effectiveness analysis: Calculate the design, manufacturing and operating costs of the double-layer equivalent source, compare the balance between its cost and performance, and evaluate its cost-effectiveness;

[0096] Reliability and stability assessment: Analyze the reliability of the double-layer equivalent source, that is, its stability and failure rate in long-term operation, and consider the impact of environmental factors on its performance, such as temperature changes, vibration, etc.;

[0097] Market competitiveness analysis: Study the competition of similar technologies or products in the market, evaluate the competitive advantages and disadvantages of the double-layer equivalent source in the market, and compare its differences and advantages with existing technologies or products;

[0098] Technology promotion and application potential: Analyze the technical innovation and application potential of the double-layer equivalent source, and explore its expansion possibility and applicability in different fields and application scenarios;

[0099] Risk assessment: Identify and evaluate the technical, market and operational risks that may be faced in implementing the dual-layer equivalent source project, and propose risk mitigation measures and response strategies;

[0100] Report and Recommendations: Summarize the analysis results, write a technical benefit analysis report, and put forward recommendations based on the analysis conclusions, including possible improvement plans or further research and development directions.

[0101] The S8 stage mainly involves the description of implementation details and engineering realization to ensure that the double-layer equivalent source can be smoothly implemented and applied according to the design plan. The following are the details and steps included in the S8 stage:

[0102] Detailed engineering design: The design plan is concretized into detailed design for engineering implementation, and the specific size, material selection, manufacturing process and other engineering implementation details of the double-layer equivalent source are determined;

[0103] Manufacturing process planning: Plan the manufacturing process of the double-layer equivalent source, ensure the accuracy and controllability of each manufacturing step, consider the problems that may be encountered in manufacturing, and develop solutions;

[0104] Material procurement and supply chain management: determine the specifications and quantity of required materials, make procurement plans, manage the supply chain, and ensure the timeliness and quality control of material supply;

[0105] Assembly and commissioning plan: Develop an assembly plan for the double-layer equivalent source, including component assembly sequence and technical requirements, and plan commissioning steps to ensure that the equipment can operate normally and meet design requirements;

[0106] Installation and adjustment: Determine the installation location and method of the double-layer equivalent source, and make adjustments during the installation process to ensure the stability and effectiveness of the equipment;

[0107] Testing and verification: Conduct functional testing and performance verification of equipment to ensure that the equipment meets the design specifications and expected technical performance requirements;

[0108] Quality control and standard compliance: Implement quality control measures to ensure that the quality of the double-layer equivalent source meets standards and regulations, follows relevant technical standards and safety regulations, and ensures the safety and reliability of the equipment;

[0109] Document and report writing: Write detailed documentation for project implementation, including manufacturing records, test reports, installation and commissioning records, etc., archive important technical information and implementation details, and provide reference for subsequent maintenance and optimization.

[0110] The S9 phase mainly involves the prediction of future development direction and application potential, in order to explore the possible evolution and expansion direction of the double-layer equivalent source technology in the future. The following are the details and steps included in the S9 phase:

[0111] Technology trend analysis: Analyze the current development trend and future prospects of magnetic field technology, especially the direction of technology evolution in the field of double-layer equivalent source applications;

[0112] Market demand forecast: Research the market demand for magnetic field control and regulation technology, including the potential market size and growth trend of double-layer equivalent sources in different industries and application scenarios;

[0113] Exploration of new technology applications: Explore the application potential of new technologies and new materials in the design and implementation of double-layer equivalent sources, and analyze the ability of these new technologies to improve the performance and efficiency of double-layer equivalent sources;

[0114] User feedback and demand survey: Collect user feedback and needs to understand their expectations for the functions and performance of the dual-layer equivalent source to guide future technology improvements and application development;

[0115] Environmental and sustainability considerations: Consider the application potential of double-layer equivalent sources in environmental protection and sustainable development, and analyze their advantages and feasibility in energy conservation and emission reduction, resource utilization efficiency, etc.;

[0116] International market analysis: Study the competition status of similar technologies and products in the international market, and analyze the competitive advantages and entry difficulty of double-layer equivalent sources in the international market;

[0117] Standardization and regulatory trends: examine the impact of relevant standards and regulations on the design and application of double-layer equivalent sources, and analyze the impact of new standards and regulations that may be introduced in the future on technology development and market access;

[0118] Technical cooperation and innovation: Explore the possibility of cross-innovation and cooperation with other technical fields to promote the comprehensive application and innovative development of double-layer equivalent source technology;

[0119] Strategic planning and promotion strategy: Formulate a strategic plan for the double-layer equivalent source technology, including R&D priorities, market promotion strategies and commercialization paths, plan the technology promotion path and market application demonstration to demonstrate its actual application effects and economic benefits.

[0120] The S10 phase mainly involves technical verification and application demonstration to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the design solution and show its performance in actual application. The following are the details and steps included in the S10 phase:

[0121] Experimental Validation: Conduct laboratory-scale validation or prototype testing to verify the design theory and numerical simulation results of the double-layer equivalent source, record experimental data, and perform data analysis to evaluate the consistency and differences between the experimental results and the expected design;

[0122] Performance evaluation: Test the performance of the double-layer equivalent source under experimental conditions, including key indicators such as magnetic field strength, stability, and response time, compare the experimental results with the expected performance targets, and evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of its practical application;

[0123] Application scenario simulation: simulate the expected application scenario of the double-layer equivalent source in a laboratory or simulation environment, observe its performance under simulated conditions, and evaluate its adaptability and effect to the actual application environment;

[0124] Case study and actual case analysis: Study existing double-layer equivalent source application cases, analyze their successes and challenges, extract key lessons and experiences from the cases, and provide reference and lessons for the implementation of new projects;

[0125] Technology demonstration and exhibition: Organize technology demonstration or exhibition to show stakeholders the technical characteristics and application potential of the double-layer equivalent source, and display experimental results and performance data to enhance confidence in the feasibility and benefits of the technology;

[0126] User feedback and improvement suggestions: Collect feedback from users or stakeholders to understand their views and needs on the dual-layer equivalent source technology, analyze the feedback information, make improvement suggestions, and consider incorporating them into the next stage of adjustment and optimization plan;

[0127] Technology Verification Report and Summary: Write a technology verification report to summarize the results and conclusions of the experiments and application demonstrations, emphasize the success points of the technology verification and potential room for improvement, and lay the foundation for further promotion and commercialization of the technology.

[0128] Through clearly defined steps (such as literature research, parameter calculation, verification, etc.), it is ensured that each key factor is systematically considered and addressed during the design process. This systematic approach helps to reduce uncertainty in the design and improve the efficiency and accuracy of the design. Through the detailed shape and position determination steps (S2), the magnetic field distribution in the actual application scenario can be more accurately simulated. This helps to ensure that the designed double-layer equivalent source can perform well under various working conditions. When calculating the magnetic parameters (S3), the complexity of the magnetic field source and the influence of the actual working environment are comprehensively considered, and its magnetic field characteristics can be more accurately predicted. This helps to avoid design adjustments and recalculations caused by inaccurate parameters in subsequent stages. In the adjustment and optimization stage (S6), fine adjustments can be made based on the results of numerical calculations or experimental verification. This iterative optimization process can significantly improve the design performance of the double-layer equivalent source and maximize its benefits. The technical benefit analysis of the design scheme (S7) and the prediction of future development directions (S9) are carried out, which helps to evaluate the technical and commercial feasibility of the design. This comprehensive analysis can provide strategic direction for the long-term development of the project and lay the foundation for further technical improvements and market applications. In the implementation details and engineering realization description stage (S8), a detailed description is given on how to implement the design scheme into the actual project, so as to ensure that the design concept can be smoothly transformed into actual products or applications. This detailed description helps to eliminate misunderstandings or problems that may arise during the implementation process. In summary, this magnetic field double-layer equivalent source implementation extension method can significantly improve the efficiency and performance of the design through its systematic, accurate and comprehensive analysis, reduce unnecessary duplication of work, and ensure that the design results can meet the needs and expectations of actual applications.

[0129] The embodiments of the present invention are given for the purpose of illustration and description, and are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the disclosed forms. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiments are selected and described in order to better illustrate the principles and practical applications of the present invention and to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the present invention and thereby design various embodiments with various modifications suitable for specific uses.

Claims

1. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1: Conduct literature research and technical background analysis; S2: Determine the position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source; S3: Calculate the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source; S4: Select appropriate extension method; S5: Perform numerical calculations or experimental verification; S6: Adjustment and optimization; S7: Conduct technical benefit analysis of the design solution; S8: Description of implementation details and engineering realization; S9: Prediction of future development direction and application potential; S10: Technology verification and application demonstration.

2. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S2, the method for determining the position and shape of the double-layer equivalent source includes using a magnetic field sensor to measure the magnetic field distribution in the actual scene, and then determining the optimal position and optimal shape of the double-layer equivalent source in space to minimize the long-distance magnetic field attenuation effect.

3. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, the method for calculating the magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source includes accurately calculating the magnetic dipole moment and the direction of the magnetic axis of the double-layer equivalent source based on measurement data or numerical simulation results to ensure its accuracy and stability in a complex magnetic field environment.

4. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S4, a method for selecting an appropriate extension method is performed, wherein the extension method includes a point dipole model, a surface dipole model or a combination thereof according to the magnetic field characteristics of the actual scene, so as to ensure the wide applicability and effect advantages of the proposed double-layer equivalent source in different environments.

5. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S5, numerical calculation or experimental verification methods are carried out, including the use of advanced numerical simulation software or customized experimental platform to verify the accuracy and effect of the selected continuation method on the double-layer equivalent source magnetic field distribution, and provide a detailed data analysis report.

6. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S6, a method for adjusting and optimizing a double-layer equivalent source includes adjusting the structural parameters, material selection or magnetic parameters of the double-layer equivalent source according to numerical calculation or experimental verification results to optimize its energy efficiency and stability in long-distance magnetic field transmission.

7. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S7, a method for technical benefit analysis of the design scheme is carried out, which includes a comparative analysis of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method with the existing technology, and a detailed evaluation of its advantages and room for improvement in terms of magnetic field control, cost-effectiveness and environmental adaptability.

8. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S8, the description method of implementation details and engineering realization includes a detailed description of the specific steps and technical details of implementing the proposed method, such as the configuration of the magnetic field measurement device, the data processing algorithm, and the engineering implementation process of its practicality verification.

9. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S9, the prediction method of future development direction and application potential is discussed, including the potential application of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method in new technology fields, such as electromagnetic isolation technology, magnetic field guidance system and application prospects in medical imaging equipment.

10. A method for realizing extension of a double-layer equivalent source of a magnetic field as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In S10, the method of technical verification and application demonstration, including field tests and application demonstrations in actual scenarios, proves the actual effect and stability of the proposed double-layer equivalent source method in complex environments, and provides technical support for its commercialization and market promotion.

Images