Multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology

Abstract

The present invention relates to the field of parameter management technology, and discloses a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology, including the following steps: step one, collecting vendor information; step two, modeling and simulation; step three, designing test scenarios; step four, executing verification; step five, analysis and evaluation; step six, optimization and adjustment; step seven, documentation and reporting. The present invention collects detailed information related to power equipment manufacturers, ensures that all relevant information is integrated, analyzes the behavior and reaction of the equipment in different situations, thus recording the handling of various operational errors, and evaluating the implementation effect of the five-defense principle, thereby achieving the beneficial effect of being able to verify the compatibility of the five-defense rules of multiple manufacturers.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of parameter management technology, and specifically to a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology. Background Art

[0002] Expression of the five-prevention rules of substation In the operation and maintenance of substation, the five-prevention rules are also called the five-prevention principles, namely: prevent accidental entry into live intervals, prevent accidental closing of circuit breakers, prevent power supply with grounding switches (grounding wires), prevent closing grounding switches (grounding wires) while live, and prevent closing disconnectors while live. In the absence of special requirements, the five-prevention rules of substation are automatically generated by the corresponding expert system. In the process of developing the expert system, technical personnel should follow the substation primary equipment connection lines and corresponding graph theory knowledge, combined with predetermined principles, to achieve automatic generation of the five-prevention control rules.

[0003] However, since the five-defense rules designed for each substation are exclusive to this power station, this leads to incompatible verification of the five-defense rules between multiple manufacturers or power stations, requiring technical personnel from both sides to communicate and be compatible. If communication errors occur, very serious power accidents will result. Summary of the invention

[0004] Technical issues solved:

[0005] In view of the shortcomings of the existing technology, the present invention provides a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology, which has the advantages of being able to verify the compatibility of the five-defense rules of multiple vendors and avoid accidents caused by the compatibility of the five-defense rules between multiple vendors, thereby solving the problems of the above-mentioned technology.

[0006] Technical solution:

[0007] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology, comprising the following steps:

[0008] Step 1: Collect manufacturer information: Obtain the configuration, functions and operating instructions of the systems and equipment of the power equipment manufacturers involved, including their protection mechanisms and control systems;

[0009] Step 2: Modeling and simulation: Use model-based simulation to model the five-prevention principles. The modeling should include the operation procedures and potential security risks of each manufacturer's equipment.

[0010] Step 3. Design test scenarios: Construct different test scenarios to simulate various operation errors and equipment interoperation situations, including: simulating the operation of mistakenly entering the energized compartment, simulating the misoperation of the circuit breaker, simulating the power supply with the grounding switch, simulating the operation of closing the grounding switch with power on, and simulating the situation of closing the disconnector with power on;

[0011] Step 4: Execution verification: Execute these test scenarios in a simulation environment, analyze the behavior and response of the device in different situations through intelligent deduction technology, record the handling of various operation errors, and ensure that the five-prevention principle can be correctly implemented in the environment of different devices and manufacturers;

[0012] Step 5: Analysis and evaluation: Conduct a detailed analysis of the verification results to determine the compatibility of the five-defense principles in different equipment and vendor environments, identify any security risks or rule conflicts, and evaluate the impact of these issues on secure operations;

[0013] Step 6: Optimization and adjustment: Make improvement suggestions based on the analysis results, and adjust the equipment configuration or operating procedures to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles;

[0014] Step 7. Documentation and Reporting: Generate detailed test reports including test methods, results, problems found and suggested solutions to provide reference for power system operation and maintenance.

[0015] Preferably, it is characterized in that: the configuration parameters in step 1 are:

[0016] ;

[0017] in: Representative Devices, is the device type; is the rated voltage; is the rated current; is the protection level; is the operating state;

[0018] ;

[0019] in: Representative Device Functions; is a functional description;

[0020] ;

[0021] in: Representative Device A protective device; For protection type: overcurrent protection, undervoltage protection, Indicates Devices in condition The following additional information or adjustment parameters are adjustment values ​​or environmental conditions.

[0022] Preferably, the control system parameters in step 1 are:

[0023] ;

[0024] in: Representative Control systems for individual devices; For control strategies; is the output parameter; is the input parameter of the control system;

[0025] ;

[0026] in: For the A comprehensive description of a device; including device configuration, functions, protection mechanisms and control system parameters, Indicates control variables or configuration settings for a device.

[0027] Preferably, the modeling expression of the equipment operation process in step 2 is: there are multiple equipments, and the operation process of each equipment is represented by a state transition model:

[0028] ;

[0029] Representative Devices at time Status; is the state transition function, which describes how the device changes from its current state Change to next state ; Indicates A system or device at a time input or control signal.

[0030] Preferably, the potential safety risk modeling expression in step 2 is:

[0031] Use the risk function RR to describe the safety risk of equipment in operation:

[0032] ;

[0033] in: Representative Device Risks associated with each protective device, Represents a function that describes the state and parameters How to jointly influence the results ; Indicates Devices in condition Parameters or settings under

[0034] ;

[0035] Represents the risks associated with the first five-prevention principle, and so on.

[0036] Preferably, in step 3, the scenario of simulating accidentally entering a live interval is simulated by setting the accidental entry risk variable express:

[0037] ;

[0038] in: is the risk of accidentally entering a live compartment; the safety threshold is a preset safety threshold used to determine whether the risk exceeds the standard; represents a function, is the input parameter of the function, which is a certain performance indicator or operating status of the device in the "real-time" state. This input is processed and the output is a risk assessment or behavioral response of the device.

[0039] Preferably, the device behavior and reaction analysis expression in step 4 is:

[0040] In the simulation environment, the behavior of the device is represented by a state transition model:

[0041] ;

[0042] in: Representative Devices at time Status; It is Devices at time Environmental factors include operating errors or external interference; Indicates Devices at time The input variable or control signal.

[0043] Preferably, the verification result analysis expression in step 5 is:

[0044] By analyzing the verification results, determine the compatibility of the five defense principles in each device and manufacturer environment. Assume that the compatibility function express:

[0045] ;

[0046] in: Represents the compatibility of the five-prevention principle. 1 indicates compatibility, 0 indicates incompatibility, and the compatibility threshold is the threshold of the compatibility check. It is a set of parameters or evaluation standards related to the five-prevention principle, including specific requirements and expectations for fire prevention, electric shock prevention, anti-static electricity, waterproof and oil leakage prevention standards. This function is used to check the compatibility of the five-prevention principle with different devices or vendor environments. A return value of 1 indicates compatibility. A return value of 0 indicates incompatibility.

[0047] Preferably, the improved suggestion formulation expression in step 6 is:

[0048] The improvement suggestions based on the analysis results are expressed as optimization suggestion functions :

[0049] ;

[0050] in: It is a suggestion for improvement; is the result of rule conflict detection; the improvement threshold is the threshold for determining whether improvement is needed; High risk factors or high-impact risk types, including equipment failure, operating errors, and environmental abnormalities; Refers to the process used to generate improvement suggestions, which make recommendations on how to optimize equipment configuration, operating procedures or other relevant factors based on the analysis results to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles.

[0051] Preferably, the test report generation in step 7 generates a detailed test report using a report generation function express:

[0052] ;

[0053] in: is the generated test report; is the test result; For the problems found; is the suggested solution; Specific testing methods or processes for implementing the five-defense principle verification, including simulation testing, fault injection testing, or state transition testing.

[0054] Compared with the prior art, the present invention provides a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology, which has the following beneficial effects:

[0055] 1. The present invention collects detailed information related to power equipment manufacturers to ensure that all relevant information is integrated, provides a comprehensive data basis for the verification of the five-prevention rules, and models the equipment, taking into account the operating procedures and potential safety risks of equipment from different manufacturers. It can simulate real operating conditions and risks in a simulation environment, thereby conducting an in-depth analysis of the five-prevention principles, and designing a variety of test scenarios to simulate operating errors and equipment interoperation conditions, including simulating operations of mistakenly entering energized intervals and misoperation of circuit breakers, etc., to ensure the effectiveness of the five-prevention principles in various situations. In a simulation environment, intelligent deduction technology is used to analyze the behavior and reaction of equipment in different situations, thereby recording the handling of various operating errors and evaluating the implementation effect of the five-prevention principles, achieving the beneficial effect of being able to verify the compatibility of the five-prevention rules of multiple manufacturers.

[0056] 2. The present invention records in detail the configuration, function, protection mechanism and control system of each manufacturer's equipment. This systematic information collection helps to ensure that the characteristics of all equipment are fully understood and integrated, thereby avoiding compatibility problems caused by missing information or misunderstanding. Through model-based simulation, the five-prevention principle is modeled, and the operating procedures and potential safety risks of the equipment are considered. This method simulates the interaction between devices in a simulation environment, foresees potential problems, and thus resolves safety hazards before actual deployment. Test scenarios for various operating errors and equipment interoperability are designed, including accidentally entering a live interval, misoperation of a circuit breaker, etc., to ensure the effectiveness of the five-prevention principle in different situations, thereby reducing the risk of accidents caused by incompatible rules in actual operations, and achieving the beneficial effect of avoiding accidents caused by compatibility issues of the five-prevention rules among multiple manufacturers. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0057] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention; DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0058] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0059] See also Figure 1 , a multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology includes the following steps:

[0060] Step 1: Collect manufacturer information: Obtain the configuration, functions and operating instructions of the systems and equipment of the power equipment manufacturers involved, including their protection mechanisms and control systems;

[0061] Step 2: Modeling and simulation: Use model-based simulation to model the five-prevention principles. The modeling should include the operation procedures and potential security risks of each manufacturer's equipment.

[0062] Step 3. Design test scenarios: Construct different test scenarios to simulate various operation errors and equipment interoperation situations, including: simulating the operation of mistakenly entering the energized compartment, simulating the misoperation of the circuit breaker, simulating the power supply with the grounding switch, simulating the operation of closing the grounding switch with power on, and simulating the situation of closing the disconnector with power on;

[0063] Step 4: Execution verification: Execute these test scenarios in a simulation environment, analyze the behavior and response of the device in different situations through intelligent deduction technology, record the handling of various operation errors, and ensure that the five-prevention principle can be correctly implemented in the environment of different devices and manufacturers;

[0064] Step 5: Analysis and evaluation: Conduct a detailed analysis of the verification results to determine the compatibility of the five-defense principles in different equipment and vendor environments, identify any security risks or rule conflicts, and evaluate the impact of these issues on secure operations;

[0065] Step 6: Optimization and adjustment: Make improvement suggestions based on the analysis results, and adjust the equipment configuration or operating procedures to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles;

[0066] Step 7. Documentation and Reporting: Generate detailed test reports including test methods, results, problems found and suggested solutions to provide reference for power system operation and maintenance.

[0067] By collecting detailed information on power equipment manufacturers, we ensure that all relevant information is integrated to provide a comprehensive data basis for the verification of the five-prevention rules.

[0068] By modeling the equipment and considering the operating procedures and potential security risks of equipment from different manufacturers, it is possible to simulate real operating conditions and risks in a simulation environment, thereby conducting an in-depth analysis of the five-prevention principles.

[0069] A variety of test scenarios are designed to simulate operational errors and equipment interoperation situations, such as simulating the operation of accidentally entering a live compartment and the misoperation of a circuit breaker, to ensure the effectiveness of the five-prevention principle in various scenarios.

[0070] Use intelligent deduction technology in a simulation environment to analyze the behavior and response of equipment in different situations, so as to record the handling of various operational errors and evaluate the implementation effect of the five-prevention principle.

[0071] Conduct a detailed analysis of the verification results, evaluate the compatibility of the five-prevention principles in different equipment and vendor environments, identify security risks or rule conflicts, and evaluate the impact of these issues on operational security.

[0072] Improvement suggestions are made based on the analysis results, and equipment configuration or operating procedures are adjusted to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles, thereby improving safety in actual operations.

[0073] Preferably, it is characterized in that: the configuration parameters in step 1 are:

[0074] ;

[0075] in: Representative Devices, is the device type; is the rated voltage; is the rated current; is the protection level; is the operating state;

[0076] ;

[0077] in: Representative Device Functions; is a functional description;

[0078] ;

[0079] in: Representative Device A protective device; For protection type: overcurrent protection, undervoltage protection, Indicates Devices in condition The following additional information or adjustment parameters are adjustment values ​​or environmental conditions.

[0080] Preferably, the control system parameters in step 1 are:

[0081] ;

[0082] in: Representative Control systems for individual devices; For control strategies; is the output parameter; is the input parameter of the control system;

[0083] ;

[0084] in: For the A comprehensive description of a device; including device configuration, functions, protection mechanisms and control system parameters, Indicates control variables or configuration settings for a device.

[0085] Preferably, the modeling expression of the equipment operation process in step 2 is: there are multiple equipments, and the operation process of each equipment is represented by a state transition model:

[0086] ;

[0087] Representative Devices at time Status; is the state transition function, which describes how the device changes from its current state Change to next state ; Indicates A system or device at a time input or control signal.

[0088] Preferably, the potential safety risk modeling expression in step 2 is:

[0089] Use the risk function RR to describe the safety risk of equipment in operation:

[0090] ;

[0091] in: Representative Device Risks associated with each protective device, Represents a function that describes the state and parameters How to jointly influence the results ; Indicates Devices in condition Parameters or settings under

[0092] The risk constraint expression of the five-prevention principle is: Each of the five-prevention principles is expressed as an inequality to ensure the safety of the operation, expressed by the following constraints:

[0093] ;

[0094] Represents the risks associated with the first five-prevention principle, and so on.

[0095] Preferably, in step 3, the scenario of simulating accidentally entering a live interval is simulated by setting the accidental entry risk variable express:

[0096] ;

[0097] in: is the risk of accidentally entering a live compartment; the safety threshold is a preset safety threshold used to determine whether the risk exceeds the standard; represents a function, is the input parameter of the function, which is a certain performance indicator or operating status of the device in the "real-time" state. This input is processed and the output is a risk assessment or behavioral response of the device.

[0098] Preferably, the device behavior and reaction analysis expression in step 4 is:

[0099] In the simulation environment, the behavior of the device is represented by a state transition model:

[0100] ;

[0101] in: Representative Devices at time Status; It is Devices at time Environmental factors include operating errors or external interference; Indicates Devices at time The input variable or control signal.

[0102] Preferably, the verification result analysis expression in step 5 is:

[0103] By analyzing the verification results, determine the compatibility of the five defense principles in each device and manufacturer environment. Assume that the compatibility function express:

[0104] ;

[0105] in: Represents the compatibility of the five-prevention principle. 1 indicates compatibility, 0 indicates incompatibility, and the compatibility threshold is the threshold of the compatibility check. It is a set of parameters or evaluation standards related to the five-prevention principle, including specific requirements and expectations for fire prevention, electric shock prevention, anti-static electricity, waterproof and oil leakage prevention standards. This function is used to check the compatibility of the five-prevention principle with different devices or vendor environments. A return value of 1 indicates compatibility. A return value of 0 indicates incompatibility.

[0106] Preferably, the improved suggestion formulation expression in step 6 is:

[0107] The improvement suggestions based on the analysis results are expressed as optimization suggestion functions :

[0108] ;

[0109] in: It is a suggestion for improvement; is the result of rule conflict detection; the improvement threshold is the threshold for determining whether improvement is needed; High risk factors or high-impact risk types, including equipment failure, operating errors, and environmental abnormalities; Refers to the process used to generate improvement suggestions, which make recommendations on how to optimize equipment configuration, operating procedures or other relevant factors based on the analysis results to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles.

[0110] Preferably, the test report generation in step 7 generates a detailed test report using a report generation function express:

[0111] ;

[0112] in: is the generated test report; is the test result; For the problems found; is the suggested solution.

[0113] Collect comprehensive vendor information: Keep detailed records of the configuration, functionality, protection mechanisms, and control systems of each vendor’s equipment. This systematic information collection helps ensure that all device features are fully understood and integrated, thus avoiding compatibility issues caused by missing or misunderstood information.

[0114] Build accurate models: Through model-based simulation, the five-prevention principles are modeled, taking into account the operating procedures and potential safety risks of the equipment. This method simulates the interaction between devices in a simulation environment, foresees potential problems, and thus resolves safety hazards before actual deployment.

[0115] Build multiple test scenarios: Design test scenarios for various operating errors and equipment interoperability situations, such as accidentally entering a live compartment and misoperating a circuit breaker. This diverse test ensures the effectiveness of the five-prevention principle in different situations, thereby reducing the risk of accidents caused by incompatible rules in actual operations.

[0116] Intelligent deduction technology analyzes equipment behavior: Use intelligent deduction technology in a simulation environment to analyze the behavior and reaction of equipment in different situations. This records and evaluates the handling of various operational errors, discovers and solves potential problems in a timely manner, and prevents these problems from causing accidents in actual operations.

[0117] Conduct a detailed analysis of the verification results: evaluate the compatibility of the five-prevention principles in different equipment and vendor environments, and identify security risks and rule conflicts. Through this analysis, adjustments can be made based on the problems found, reducing the risk of security incidents caused by rule conflicts.

[0118] Make improvement suggestions: Based on the analysis results, make improvement suggestions and adjust the equipment configuration or operating procedures. This optimization can improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles, ensure that the equipment can work as expected in actual operation, and reduce accidents caused by incompatibility.

[0119] Generate test reports: Detailed test reports include test methods, results, issues found, and suggested solutions, providing a clear reference for power system operations and maintenance. This helps relevant personnel understand potential compatibility issues and take preventive measures, thereby further reducing the risk of accidents.

[0120] Embodiment 1: The above test is carried out in a certain power substation, and the specific implementation steps are as follows:

[0121] Simulation test: Use simulation software to simulate the operation of the substation under high load and short circuit conditions, and record the response time and fault detection rate of the equipment;

[0122] Fault injection test: In actual operation, select a specific time period to inject faults, observe the action of the protection device, and record relevant data;

[0123] State transition test: During equipment maintenance, a state transition test is performed to ensure that the equipment switches smoothly and correctly between different states;

[0124] Test report example

[0125] Power system test report:

[0126] 1. Test method:

[0127] Mock test;

[0128] Fault injection testing;

[0129] State transfer test;

[0130] 2. Test results:

[0131] Device response time: The average response time is 2.5 seconds;

[0132] Fault detection rate: 85%;

[0133] Action of protection devices: 90% of the protection devices operate normally;

[0134] 3. Problems found:

[0135] Response delay: The response time of some devices exceeds 3 seconds;

[0136] Inadequate fault detection: 15% of faults are not detected in time;

[0137] Failure of protection devices: 10% of the protection devices failed to operate properly;

[0138] 4. Suggested solutions:

[0139] Optimize response mechanism;

[0140] Strong fault detection capability;

[0141] Regular maintenance and testing.

[0142] Example 2: Manufacturer equipment information collection:

[0143] Collect and record information about the devices involved, including:

[0144] Equipment type (T_i): Transformer, circuit breaker, disconnector.

[0145] Rated voltage (V_i): 110 kV, 220 kV.

[0146] Rated current (I_i): 1000 A, 2000 A.

[0147] Protection grade (P_i): IP54, IP67.

[0148] Operation status (S_i): normal, faulty, or in maintenance.

[0149] include:

[0150] Equipment 1 (E_1): E_1 = (Transformer, 220kV, 2000A, IP67, Normal)

[0151] Equipment 2 (E_2): E_2 = (Circuit Breaker, 110kV, 1000A, IP54, Normal)

[0152] Device function description:

[0153] Function 1 (F_{11}): F_{11} = (Automatic power off)

[0154] Function 2 (F_{12}): F_{12} = (overload protection)

[0155] Protection device information:

[0156] Protection device 1 (P_{11}): P_{11} = (overcurrent protection, type 1)

[0157] Protection device 2 (P_{12}): P_{12} = (undervoltage protection, type 2)

[0158] Control system parameters:

[0159] Control system 1 (C_1): C_1 = (PID control, output voltage, output current).

[0160] Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations may be made to the embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step 1: Collect manufacturer information: Obtain the configuration, functions and operating instructions of the systems and equipment of the power equipment manufacturers involved, including their protection mechanisms and control systems; Step 2: Modeling and simulation: Use model-based simulation to model the five-prevention principles. The modeling should include the operating procedures and potential security risks of each manufacturer's equipment. Step 3. Design test scenarios: Construct different test scenarios to simulate various operation errors and equipment interoperation situations, including: simulating the operation of mistakenly entering the energized compartment, simulating the misoperation of the circuit breaker, simulating the power supply with the grounding switch, simulating the operation of closing the grounding switch with power on, and simulating the situation of closing the disconnector with power on; Step 4: Execution verification: Execute these test scenarios in a simulation environment, analyze the behavior and response of the device in different situations through intelligent deduction technology, record the handling of various operation errors, and ensure that the five-prevention principle can be correctly implemented in the environment of different devices and manufacturers; Step 5: Analysis and evaluation: Conduct a detailed analysis of the verification results to determine the compatibility of the five-defense principles in different equipment and vendor environments, identify any security risks or rule conflicts, and evaluate the impact of these issues on secure operations; Step 6: Optimization and adjustment: Make improvement suggestions based on the analysis results, and adjust the equipment configuration or operating procedures to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles; Step 7. Documentation and Reporting: Generate detailed test reports including test methods, results, problems found and suggested solutions to provide reference for power system operation and maintenance.

2. According to the multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 1, it is characterized by: The configuration parameters in step 1 are: ； in: Representative Devices, is the device type; is the rated voltage; is the rated current; is the protection level; is the operating state; ； in: Representative Device Functions; is a functional description; ； in: Representative Device A protective device; For protection type: overcurrent protection, undervoltage protection, Indicates Devices in condition The following additional information or adjustment parameters are adjustment values ​​or environmental conditions.

3. According to claim 1, the multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology is characterized by: The control system parameters in step 1 are: ； in: Representative Control systems for individual devices; For control strategies; is the output parameter; is the input parameter of the control system; ； in: For the A comprehensive description of a device; including device configuration, functions, protection mechanisms and control system parameters, Indicates control variables or configuration settings for a device.

4. According to claim 1, the multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology is characterized by: The modeling expression of the equipment operation process in step 2 is: there are multiple equipments, and the operation process of each equipment is represented by a state transition model: ； Representative Devices at time Status; is the state transition function, which describes how the device changes from its current state Change to next state ; Indicates A system or device at a time input or control signal.

5. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 4 is characterized by: The potential safety risk modeling expression in step 2 is: Use the risk function RR to describe the safety risk of equipment in operation: ； in: Representative Device Risks associated with each protective device, Represents a function that describes the state and parameters How to jointly influence the results ; Indicates Devices in condition Parameters or settings under The risk constraint expression of the five-prevention principle is: Each of the five-prevention principles is expressed as an inequality to ensure the safety of the operation, expressed by the following constraints: ； Represents the risks associated with the first five-prevention principle, and so on.

6. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 5 is characterized by: In step 3, the scenario of accidentally entering a live compartment is simulated by setting the accidental entry risk variable express: ； in: is the risk of accidentally entering a live compartment; the safety threshold is a preset safety threshold used to determine whether the risk exceeds the standard; represents a function, is the input parameter of the function, which is a certain performance indicator or operating status of the device in the "real-time" state. This input is processed and the output is a risk assessment or behavioral response of the device.

7. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 6 is characterized by: The device behavior and reaction analysis expression in step 4 is: In the simulation environment, the behavior of the device is represented by a state transition model: ； in: Representative Devices at time Status; It is Devices at time Environmental factors include operating errors or external interference; Indicates Devices at time The input variable or control signal.

8. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 7 is characterized by: The verification result analysis expression in step 5 is: By analyzing the verification results, the compatibility of the five defense principles in each device and manufacturer environment is determined, assuming that the compatibility function express: ； in: Represents the compatibility of the five-prevention principle. 1 indicates compatibility, 0 indicates incompatibility, and the compatibility threshold is the threshold of the compatibility check. It is a set of parameters or evaluation standards related to the five-prevention principle, including specific requirements and expectations for fire prevention, electric shock prevention, anti-static electricity, waterproof and oil leakage prevention standards. This function is used to check the compatibility of the five-prevention principle with different devices or vendor environments. A return value of 1 indicates compatibility. A return value of 0 indicates incompatibility.

9. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 8 is characterized by: The improved suggestion in step 6 is formulated as follows: The improvement suggestions based on the analysis results are expressed as optimization suggestion functions : ； in: It is a suggestion for improvement; is the result of rule conflict detection; the improvement threshold is the threshold for determining whether improvement is needed; High risk factors or high-impact risk types, including equipment failure, operating errors, and environmental abnormalities; Refers to the process used to generate improvement suggestions, which make recommendations on how to optimize equipment configuration, operating procedures or other relevant factors based on the analysis results to improve the compatibility and effectiveness of the five-prevention principles.

10. The multi-vendor compatible five-defense rule verification method based on intelligent deduction technology according to claim 9 is characterized by: The test report generation in step 7 generates a detailed test report using the report generation function express: ； in: is the generated test report; is the test result; For the problems found; is the suggested solution; Specific testing methods or processes for implementing the five-defense principle verification, including simulation testing, fault injection testing, or state transition testing.

Images