Consistency measurement method, device and equipment for civil aviation system and storage medium

Abstract

The invention provides a consistency measurement method, device and equipment for a civil aviation system and a storage medium, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining consistency measurement original data which comprises visual design, interaction and feedback of a product and a special scene; evaluating the visual design to generate an evaluation result R1; evaluating the interaction and feedback to generate an evaluation result R2; evaluating the special scene to generate an evaluation result R3; based on the evaluation results R1, R2 and R3, weight distribution is carried out on visual design, interaction and feedback and a special scene, and weight data are input; and calculating a consistency user experience measurement index S according to the weight data. Through weight distribution, according to the consistency experience measurement index, the consistency user experience quantitative data of the product is effectively analyzed, the rigorousness and objectivity of the data are improved, the uncertainty and negative effects caused by subjective opinions are reduced, and therefore a unified service access platform of a passenger service system is scientifically and effectively measured.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of system evaluation, and in particular, relates to a method, device, equipment and storage medium for consistency measurement of a civil aviation system. Background Art

[0002] With the development of Internet information technology and the rapid growth of the civil aviation travel market, the various functions of the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system are presented to airline users in a simple and intuitive way, combined with a new graphical display method.

[0003] During the development and production of the unified service access platform for the new generation of passenger service systems, the individual needs of each airline vary greatly, resulting in instability in design components and styles in the development planning of the unified service access platform product function versions, which adds a lot of additional design and development costs; in addition, during the switching and use phase of the new and old platform systems, each airline often evaluates the platform system one-sidedly based on subjective judgment and the habit of relying on the black box (command line interface) operation, often lacking objective factual data basis, and lacking effective analysis of the consistent user experience quantitative data of the unified service access platform in the actual production of each airline, which makes it difficult to scientifically and effectively measure the unified service access platform for the new generation of passenger service systems. Summary of the invention

[0004] To solve the above problems, the present invention provides a method, device, equipment and storage medium for consistency measurement in a civil aviation system. Based on the three dimensions of product visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios, an experience measurement index of product consistency is obtained through a model formula. For the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system, effective analysis of the quantitative data of consistent user experience in actual production of various airlines is carried out, which helps the civil aviation information product system to quickly unify the design and development standards, scientifically and efficiently improve the product user experience, and realize scientific and effective measurement of the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system.

[0005] A first aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system, comprising: obtaining original consistency measurement data, the original consistency measurement data including visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of a product; evaluating the visual design of the product to generate an evaluation result R1; evaluating the interaction and feedback of the product to generate an evaluation result R2; evaluating the special scenarios of the product to generate an evaluation result R3; assigning weights to the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, respectively, and entering weight data; and calculating a consistency user experience measurement index S according to the weight data.

[0006] With this setting, based on the three dimensions of product visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios, these three dimensions are evaluated respectively, so as to allocate weights according to the evaluation results, and finally the experience measurement index of product consistency is obtained through the model formula; by adopting multi-dimensional user experience indicators and rigorous and objective data analysis and demonstration methods to reduce the uncertainty and negative impact brought by subjective opinions, the consistent user experience quantitative data of each user in the actual production of the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system is effectively analyzed, so as to scientifically and effectively measure the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system.

[0007] In some embodiments, the evaluation of the visual design of the product to generate the evaluation result R1 includes: scoring the inspection items in the visual design of the product with a scale questionnaire and collecting consistency data of the visual design; calculating a consistency measurement index of the visual design based on the consistency data of the visual design; and generating the evaluation result R1 based on the consistency measurement index of the visual design.

[0008] This arrangement makes it possible to obtain the individual needs of each user for product visual design after generating the evaluation result R1 according to the consistency measurement index of the visual design, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment.

[0009] In some embodiments, the evaluation of the interaction and feedback of the product to generate the evaluation result R2 includes: scoring the inspection items of the interaction and feedback of the product with a scale questionnaire, and collecting consistency data of the interaction and feedback; calculating the consistency measurement index of the interaction and feedback based on the consistency data of the interaction and feedback; and generating the evaluation result R2 based on the consistency measurement index of the interaction and feedback.

[0010] This setting makes it possible to obtain the personalized demand differences of each user on the interface layout and style of the product after generating the evaluation result R2 according to the consistency measurement index of interaction and feedback, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment and increase the basis of objective factual data, so as to scientifically and efficiently unify the specific development and design standards of the product.

[0011] In some embodiments, the evaluation of the special scenarios of the product to generate the evaluation result R3 includes: organizing and consistency checking the special scenarios of the product, formulating dimensional items for special scenario inspections, corresponding weights and severity scoring rules, scoring the inspection items of special scenarios with scale questionnaires, and collecting consistency data for special scenarios; calculating the consistency measurement index of special scenarios based on the consistency data of special scenarios; and generating the evaluation result R3 based on the consistency measurement index of special scenarios.

[0012] This setting makes it easy to generate the evaluation result R3 based on the consistency measurement index of the special scenario, so as to obtain the personalized demand differences of each user in the special scenario of the product, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment and adapt to the personalization of user business needs and the uniqueness of the market.

[0013] In some embodiments, the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product are weighted based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, respectively, and the weight data entry includes: obtaining the weight relationship between the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios based on the data collected through scale questionnaire scoring by R&D team members participating in the test; and weighting the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios based on the weight relationship.

[0014] This setting makes it possible to obtain the proportion of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios in the user experience through the weights of the three dimensions, which will help users to evaluate the product more comprehensively during the switching and use stages of the new and old platform systems.

[0015] In some embodiments, calculating the consistent user experience metric index S according to the weight data includes: calculating and obtaining the consistent user experience metric index S according to the consistency data, evaluation results and weight distribution of the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios.

[0016] This setting makes it easier to unify design and development standards through the consistent user experience measurement index S, improve product user experience scientifically and efficiently, and reduce communication costs for R&D personnel.

[0017] In some embodiments, the calculation of the consistent user experience metric index S based on the consistency data, evaluation results and weight distribution of the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios includes: the consistent user experience metric index of the product's visual design is S1, the consistent user experience metric index of interaction and feedback is S2, and the consistent user experience metric index of the special scenario is S3, wherein,

[0018] S=S1+S2+S3

[0019]

[0020] c1 is the weight of visual design, c2 is the weight of interaction and feedback, and c3 is the weight of special scenarios; m is the weight of product non-compliance rate; n1 is the total number of problem check items in visual design; n2 is the total number of problem check items in interaction and feedback; n3 is the total number of problem check items in special scenarios; N1 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for visual design walkthrough; N2 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for interaction and feedback walkthrough; N3 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for special scenario walkthrough; They are the overall non-compliance rates of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios; k1~k3 are the kth n The kth inspection dimension item is the inspection n inspection dimension items; a1~a3 are the weights of the inspection dimension items of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios respectively; b1~b3 are the problem severity scores of the inspection dimension items of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios respectively.

[0021] This setting increases the authenticity and accuracy of the data through weights, overall non-compliance rates, inspection dimensions, and problem severity scores, helps obtain product consistency measurement indexes in visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios, and reduces the uncertainty and negative impact of subjective opinions.

[0022] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a device for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system, the device comprising: a data acquisition module for acquiring raw consistency measurement data, the raw consistency measurement data comprising visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of a product; an evaluation module for evaluating the visual design of the product and generating an evaluation result R1; for evaluating the interaction and feedback of the product and generating an evaluation result R2; for evaluating the special scenarios of the product and generating an evaluation result R3; a weight allocation module for respectively assigning weights to the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, and entering weight data; and a metric calculation module for calculating a consistency user experience metric index S according to the weight data.

[0023] This setting, on the one hand, adopts multi-dimensional user experience indicators and rigorous and objective data analysis and demonstration methods to reduce the uncertainty and negative impact brought by subjective opinions; on the other hand, it provides insight into user needs, helps products optimize interface layout and interactive feedback, provides users with more emotional value, and improves user experience and satisfaction; on the other hand, it unifies the design and development standards of the front-end of Air China products, reduces the communication costs of R&D personnel, and improves product R&D efficiency.

[0024] A third aspect of the present disclosure provides an electronic device, comprising: a memory for storing a computer program; and a processor for implementing the method for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing the computer program.

[0025] The technical effects brought about by any possible implementation of the third aspect can refer to the technical effects brought about by the above-mentioned first aspect, and will not be repeated here.

[0026] A fourth aspect of the present disclosure provides a computer storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system as described in the first aspect is implemented.

[0027] The technical effects brought about by any possible implementation of the fourth aspect can refer to the technical effects brought about by the above-mentioned first aspect, and will not be repeated here.

[0028] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:

[0029] 1. Multi-dimensional consistent user experience quantitative indicators: The present invention adopts multi-dimensional user experience indicators and rigorous and objective data analysis and demonstration methods to reduce the uncertainty and negative impact caused by subjective opinions.

[0030] 2. Improve user experience and satisfaction: This disclosure can help gain insight into user needs, help products optimize interface layout and interactive feedback, provide users with more emotional value, and improve user experience and satisfaction.

[0031] 3. Improve product R&D efficiency: unify the design and development standards of the product front end, reduce the communication costs of R&D personnel, and enhance users' unified understanding of the product.

[0032] 4. Universality: The method disclosed in the present invention can be applied not only to civil aviation information systems, but also to business systems in other fields, and has a broad application prospect.

[0033] Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will be described in the following description, and partly become apparent from the description, or be understood by implementing the present disclosure. The purpose and other advantages of the present disclosure can be realized and obtained by the structures pointed out in the description, claims and drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0034] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present disclosure. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0035] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system provided by the present disclosure;

[0036] Figure 2 A product consistency walkthrough diagram provided for an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0037] Figure 3 A customized flow chart of product consistency check items provided for the embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0038] Figure 4 is a block diagram of a device for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0039] Figure 5 A structural block diagram of an electronic device provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0040] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure clearer, the technical solution in the embodiments of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.

[0041] The following is a brief introduction to some concepts that may be involved in the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0042] Open Universal Control Front End (ETERM CONTROL): ALG integrates workflows for actual business scenarios such as flight planning, flight control, product management, and sales control based on the SAT service interface provided by the managed service software in the PSS product management and product pricing business areas, and provides a graphical management and operation interface to airline control personnel.

[0043] With the development of Internet information technology and the rapid growth of the civil aviation travel market, the Skyone flight control system of the black box (command line interface) can no longer meet the needs of the existing market. In order to ensure the operation scenarios of airlines' large-scale business interactions between flights, and to support the needs of airlines and business departments to control business, manage business, and sell tickets and additional services through graphical interfaces, existing manufacturers have created a unified service access platform system (ALG / DGU I / SGUI and other products) for airline users. ALG / DGUI / SGUI and other products reasonably integrate functional business processes and combine new graphical display methods to display the various functions of the new generation of passenger service system platform to airline users in a simple and intuitive way.

[0044] At present, in the early stage of R&D and production of ALG / DGU I / SGU I and other products, manufacturers mainly focus on the construction of product functions. During the production process, airlines have continuously put forward demands for experience improvement. In addition, due to the large differences in personalized needs of each airline, there is instability in design components and styles in the R&D planning of ALG / DGUI / SGUI product function versions, which adds a lot of additional design and development costs. In addition, due to the particularity of production in the civil aviation industry, during the switching and use stage of the old and new platform systems, each airline often evaluates the platform system one-sidedly based on subjective judgment and the habit of relying on the operation of the black box (command line interface) Skyone system, which often lacks objective factual data basis.

[0045] The above situation makes it difficult for manufacturers to scientifically and efficiently unify the specific development and design standards of ALG / DGU I / SGUI software based on local feedback from airlines. In response to this problem, some analysis methods have been proposed and applied, but due to the individuality of airline business needs and the uniqueness of the market, the existing methods lack effective analysis of the quantitative data of consistent user experience of ALG / DGUI / SGUI and other products in actual production of various airlines, which makes it difficult to scientifically and effectively measure the unified service access platform of the new generation of passenger service system. Therefore, how to scientifically and effectively measure the consistent user experience of ALG / DGUI / SGUI has become a problem in the civil aviation industry.

[0046] To this end, the present disclosure provides a method, device, equipment and storage medium for consistency measurement in a civil aviation system to scientifically and effectively measure the consistent user experience of ALG / DGUI / SGUI. Figure 1 As shown, Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for consistency measurement for a civil aviation system provided by the present disclosure, the method comprising:

[0047] S100. Obtaining raw data of consistency measurement, where the raw data of consistency measurement includes the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product.

[0048] In this embodiment, the original consistency measurement data of products such as ALG / DGU I / SGU I are collected, mainly consistency measurement data of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios.

[0049] S200, evaluating the visual design of the product and generating an evaluation result R1.

[0050] In this embodiment, by scoring the inspection items in the product visual design with a scale questionnaire and collecting consistency data of the visual design, a product visual design consistency measurement index, that is, an evaluation result R1 of the product visual design, is obtained based on the following formula.

[0051]

[0052] The specific interpretation of the product visual design consistency measurement formula is:

[0053] n1 / N1 represents the overall non-compliance rate of product visual design; n1 is the total number of problem inspection items in visual design; N1 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators of visual design walkthrough; m is the weight of product non-compliance rate (m∈(0,1)); a k is the weight a of the kth inspection dimension item; b k refers to the severity score b of the kth inspection dimension item; c1 is the weight of the visual design dimension (c1∈(0,1)). After obtaining R1 in this way, it is easy to obtain the personalized demand differences of each user in the visual design of the product, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment.

[0054] S300, evaluating the interaction and feedback of the product and generating an evaluation result R2.

[0055] In this embodiment, the interaction and feedback of the product is scored by using a scale questionnaire on the inspection items in the product interaction and feedback, and the consistency data of the visual design is collected to obtain a consistency measurement index of the product's interaction and feedback based on the following formula, that is, the evaluation result R2 of the product's interaction and feedback.

[0056]

[0057] The specific interpretation of the product interaction and feedback consistency measurement formula is:

[0058] n2 / N2 represents the overall non-compliance rate of product interaction and feedback; n2 is the total number of problem check items in interaction and feedback; N2 is the number of check dimension item indicators for interaction and feedback walkthrough; m is the weight of the product non-compliance rate (m∈(0,1)); e r Refers to the severity score e of the rth inspection dimension item; d r Refers to the weight d of the rth inspection dimension item; c2 is the weight of the interaction and feedback dimension (c2∈(0,1)). In this way, it is easy to obtain the personalized demand differences of each user on the interface layout and style of the product based on R2, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment and increase the objective factual data basis, so as to scientifically and efficiently unify the specific development and design standards of the product.

[0059] S400: Evaluate special scenarios of the product and generate evaluation result R3.

[0060] In this embodiment, for special scenarios of the product, based on the unified organization and consistency check of elements such as special scenarios involved in the software product, dimension items for special scenario inspection, corresponding weights and severity scoring rules are formulated, and the scores of corresponding inspection items are collected through a scale questionnaire. The consistency measurement index of the special scenarios of the product is obtained based on the following formula, that is, the evaluation result R3 of the special scenarios of the product.

[0061]

[0062] The specific interpretation of the product's special scenario consistency measurement formula is:

[0063] n3 / N3 represents the overall non-compliance rate of special scenarios of the product; n3 is the total number of problem inspection items in special scenarios; N3 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for special scenario walkthroughs; m is the weight of the product non-compliance rate (m∈(0,1)); f t Refers to the weight f of the tth inspection dimension item; g t Refers to the severity score g of the t-th inspection dimension item; c3 is the weight of the product special scenario dimension (c3∈(0,1)). In this way, it is easy to obtain the personalized demand differences of each user in the special scenario of the product based on R3, which helps to improve user satisfaction after timely adjustment and adapt to the personalization of user business needs and the uniqueness of the market.

[0064] S500: Based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, weights are assigned to the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios, and weight data is entered.

[0065] In this embodiment, based on the data collected by the R&D team members participating in the test through scale questionnaire scoring, the weight relationship between the three units of product visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios is obtained, and then the weights of the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios are allocated according to the weight relationship.

[0066] For example, the weight of visual design may be c1, the weight of interaction and feedback may be c2, and the weight of special scenes may be c3, where c1+c2+c3=1.

[0067] S600: Calculate a consistent user experience measurement index S according to the weight data.

[0068] In this embodiment, the consistent user experience measurement index S is calculated by the consistency data, evaluation results and weight distribution of the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenes. The consistent user experience measurement index of the product's visual design is S1, the consistent user experience measurement index of interaction and feedback is S2, and the consistent user experience measurement index of special scenes is S3, where:

[0069] S=S1+S2+S3

[0070]

[0071] The specific interpretation of the product consistency user experience measurement index formula is:

[0072] c1 is the weight of visual design, c2 is the weight of interaction and feedback, and c3 is the weight of special scenarios; m is the weight of product non-compliance rate; n1 is the total number of problem check items in visual design; n2 is the total number of problem check items in interaction and feedback; n3 is the total number of problem check items in special scenarios; N1 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for visual design walkthrough; N2 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for interaction and feedback walkthrough; N3 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for special scenario walkthrough; They are the overall non-compliance rates of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios; a k is the weight a of the kth inspection dimension item; b k refers to the severity score b of the kth inspection dimension item; e r Refers to the severity score e of the rth inspection dimension item; d r refers to the weight d of the rth inspection dimension item; f t Refers to the weight f of the tth inspection dimension item; g tRefers to the severity score g of the t-th inspection dimension item. In this way, by scoring the product weight, overall non-compliance rate, inspection dimension, and problem severity, the authenticity and accuracy of the data can be increased, which helps to obtain the consistency measurement index of the product in visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios, and reduce the uncertainty and negative impact caused by subjective opinions.

[0073] Example:

[0074] Get the ALG consistency metric index, such as Figure 2 and Figure 3 As shown, Figure 2 A product consistency walkthrough diagram provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure, Figure 3 A customized flow chart for product consistency walkthrough items provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure is provided. The consistency walkthrough is jointly participated in by multiple roles and a walkthrough strategy is formulated to confirm a function-level walkthrough or a system-level walkthrough.

[0075] Collect the original data of consistency measurement. The consistency measurement walkthrough of the product includes three units: visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios. Each unit corresponds to multiple walkthrough items. For details, please refer to the following table.

[0076]

[0077] The collected consistency metrics are originally evaluated. Taking the 28 self-check points in the visual design module of ALG products as an example, assuming that 0.4 is the weight of the visual design check module, 5 is the total number of problem check items in visual design, 0.3 is the weight of the product non-compliance rate, 0.7 is the weight of the average score of the self-check items, each self-check comment is divided into b, k is the kth self-check point item, then the visual design consistency measurement index is

[0078]

[0079] It should be noted that the same applies to product interaction and feedback, and the evaluation of special scenario business units.

[0080] Then weight the consistency user experience index. Weight the three units of product visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios for ALG, and substitute them into formula S to get the consistency index of the product.

[0081] Based on the above method, the embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a device 2000 for measuring consistency for a civil aviation system corresponding to the above method, such as Figure 4 As shown, Figure 4 The apparatus 2000 for consistency measurement for civil aviation system includes a data collection module 210 , an evaluation module 220 , a weight allocation module 230 , and a metric calculation module 240 .

[0082] The acquisition module 210 is used to obtain the original data of consistency measurement, which includes the visual design, interaction and feedback of the product and special scenarios.

[0083] The evaluation module 220 includes a first unit, a second unit, and a third unit to specifically evaluate the collected data. The first unit is used to evaluate the visual design of the product and generate an evaluation result R1; it can be understood that the evaluation is performed through the formulated visual design inspection items, the corresponding weights and severity scoring rules, and the collected scale questionnaire data. The second unit is used to evaluate the interaction and feedback of the product and generate an evaluation result R2. It can be understood that the evaluation is performed through the formulated interaction and feedback inspection items, the corresponding weights and severity scoring rules, and the collected scale questionnaire data. The third unit is used to evaluate the special scenarios of the product and generate an evaluation result R3. It can be understood that the evaluation is performed through the formulated special scenario inspection items, the corresponding weights and severity scoring rules, and the collected scale questionnaire data.

[0084] The weight allocation module 230 is used to allocate weights to the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, and enter weight data.

[0085] The metric calculation module 240 is used to calculate a consistent user experience metric index S according to the weight data.

[0086] On the one hand, we adopt multi-dimensional user experience indicators and rigorous and objective data analysis and demonstration methods to reduce the uncertainty and negative impact brought by subjective opinions; on the other hand, we gain insight into user needs, help products optimize interface layout and interactive feedback, provide users with more emotional value, and improve user experience and satisfaction; on the other hand, we unify the design and development standards of the front-end of Air China products, reduce the communication costs of R&D personnel, and improve product R&D efficiency.

[0087] Based on the same inventive concept as the above disclosed content, the present disclosure also provides an electronic device 3000. Figure 5 As shown, Figure 5 The electronic device 3000 provided by the present disclosure is a structural block diagram. The electronic device 3000 of the embodiment of the present disclosure includes at least one processor 310 and at least one memory 320 electrically connected. The memory 320 is electrically connected to the processor 310, wherein the memory 320 stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor 310, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor 310 so that the at least one processor 310 can execute the method as described above.

[0088] It should be noted that the electrical connection between the above-mentioned units does not necessarily mean the connection between lines. An indirect connection method can be applied to the embodiments of the present disclosure as long as the purpose of the present disclosure is achieved.

[0089] Based on the same inventive concept, the present disclosure also provides a computer storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method described above is performed. The storage medium may include: a U disk, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other media that can store program codes.

[0090] Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein; and these modifications or replacements do not make the essence of the corresponding technical solutions deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for measuring consistency in a civil aviation system, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining original consistency measurement data, where the original consistency measurement data includes visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product; Evaluate the visual design of the product and generate an evaluation result R1; Evaluate the interaction and feedback of the product to generate an evaluation result R2; Evaluate the special scenario of the product and generate evaluation result R3; Based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, weights are assigned to the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product, and weight data is entered; The consistent user experience measurement index S is calculated according to the weight data.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The evaluating the visual design of the product to generate the evaluation result R1 includes: Scoring the inspection items in the visual design of the product using a questionnaire and collecting consistency data of the visual design; Calculating a consistency measurement index of the visual design based on the consistency data of the visual design; An evaluation result R1 is generated according to the consistency measurement index of the visual design.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The evaluation of the interaction and feedback of the product to generate the evaluation result R2 includes: Scoring the interaction and feedback check items of the product using a questionnaire, and collecting consistency data on the interaction and feedback; Calculating a consistency measurement index of interaction and feedback according to the consistency data of the interaction and feedback; An evaluation result R2 is generated according to the consistency measurement index of the interaction and feedback.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation of the special scenario of the product to generate the evaluation result R3 includes: Organize and check the consistency of the special scenarios of the product, formulate the dimension items, corresponding weights and severity scoring rules for special scenario inspections, conduct scale questionnaire scoring on the inspection items of special scenarios, and collect consistency data for special scenarios; Calculating a consistency measurement index of a special scenario according to the consistency data of the special scenario; An evaluation result R3 is generated according to the consistency measurement index of the special scenario.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, weights are assigned to the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product, respectively, and the weight data input includes: Based on the data collected by the R&D team members participating in the test through questionnaire scoring, the weight relationship between the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios is obtained; The visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product are weighted according to the weight relationship.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that: Calculating the consistent user experience measurement index S according to the weight data includes: Based on the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and consistency data, evaluation results, and weight distribution of special scenarios, the consistent user experience measurement index S is calculated.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The calculation of the consistent user experience metric index S based on the product's visual design, interaction and feedback, and consistency data, evaluation results, and weight distribution of special scenarios includes: The consistency user experience measurement index of the product's visual design is S1, the consistency user experience measurement index of interaction and feedback is S2, and the consistency user experience measurement index of special scenarios is S3, where: S=S1+S2+S3 c1 is the weight of visual design, c2 is the weight of interaction and feedback, and c3 is the weight of special scenarios; m is the weight of product non-compliance rate; n1 is the total number of problem check items in visual design; n2 is the total number of problem check items in interaction and feedback; n3 is the total number of problem check items in special scenarios; N1 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for visual design walkthrough; N2 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for interaction and feedback walkthrough; N3 is the number of inspection dimension item indicators for special scenario walkthrough; They are the overall non-compliance rates of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios; k1~k3 are the kth n inspection dimension items; a1~a3 are the weights of the inspection dimension items of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios respectively; b1~b3 are the problem severity scores of the inspection dimension items of visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios respectively.

8. A device for measuring consistency in a civil aviation system, characterized in that: The device comprises: A data collection module is used to obtain raw data of consistency measurement, wherein the raw data of consistency measurement includes visual design, interaction and feedback of the product and special scenarios; An evaluation module, used to evaluate the visual design of the product and generate an evaluation result R1; used to evaluate the interaction and feedback of the product and generate an evaluation result R2; used to evaluate the special scene of the product and generate an evaluation result R3; A weight allocation module, used to allocate weights to the visual design, interaction and feedback, and special scenarios of the product based on the evaluation results R1, R2, and R3, and input weight data; The metric calculation module is used to calculate the consistent user experience metric index S according to the weight data.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device comprises: Memory for storing computer programs; A processor is used to implement the steps of the electromechanical equipment procurement management method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the electromechanical equipment procurement management method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images