Power dispatching risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
By comprehensively evaluating duty information, operation ticket information and power load value, the risk score for power scheduling is generated, which solves the problem of failing to fully consider duty personnel information and operation ticket information in the existing technology, and improves the accuracy of risk assessment of power scheduling Sex and reliability.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411423489.3
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-10-12
- Publication Date
- 2025-01-14
AI Technical Summary
The prior art fails to fully consider the information of duty personnel and operation ticket information in the risk assessment of power scheduling, resulting in the incomplete risk assessment and reducing the safety and reliability of power scheduling.
By obtaining duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values, the duty risk score, operation ticket risk score and load risk score, and combining these scores to generate the risk score of power scheduling, thereby determining the risk of power scheduling grade.
A more accurate power scheduling risk assessment has been achieved, and various risk factors in the power scheduling process have been fully identified and analyzed, which has improved the safety and reliability of power scheduling, and ensured that the power system maintains stable operation in complex environments.
Smart Images

Figure CN119313158A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of risk assessment for power dispatching, and in particular to a risk assessment method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for power dispatching. Background Art
[0002] Power dispatch plays a vital role in modern power systems. With the development of social economy and the increase in electricity demand, power systems are facing increasingly complex challenges, including load fluctuations, access to renewable energy, and the operating status of equipment. Effective power dispatch risk assessment can identify and analyze potential risk factors, including equipment failure, external environmental changes, and the impact of human resources, to ensure the stability and reliability of power supply and avoid system failures caused by power shortages or surpluses.
[0003] Existing technologies in risk assessment of power dispatching usually focus on the analysis of equipment status, load forecasting, environmental factors, and historical fault data. However, these methods often fail to fully consider the importance of on-duty personnel information and operation ticket information. For example, the information of on-duty personnel can reflect their skills and emergency response capabilities, which is particularly important when facing emergencies. Qualified on-duty personnel can respond quickly and execute the standard procedures in the operation ticket, thereby effectively reducing risks. The operation ticket provides detailed operating instructions and safety procedures to ensure that best practices are followed during the dispatching process and reduce the possibility of human errors. Therefore, existing technologies have certain limitations in the risk assessment of power dispatching, and fail to comprehensively assess the risks of power dispatching, thereby reducing the safety and reliability of power dispatching. Summary of the invention
[0004] The embodiment of the present invention provides a method, device, electronic device and storage medium for risk assessment of power dispatching. By implementing the present invention, duty information, operation ticket information and power load value can be comprehensively considered, thereby achieving more accurate risk assessment of power dispatching.
[0005] An embodiment of the present invention provides a risk assessment method for power dispatching, comprising:
[0006] Obtain duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values; duty information data includes: night shift status of duty personnel, duty frequency of duty personnel, cumulative duty time of duty personnel and personnel allocation of duty posts; operation ticket data includes: number of operation tickets at the handover time, weather conditions during the execution of operation tickets, number of equipment operations, number of abnormal operation tasks and equipment name.
[0007] The corresponding duty risk score shall be determined based on the night shift situation, duty frequency, cumulative duty time and staffing of duty posts of the duty personnel.
[0008] Determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score based on the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time, weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, number of equipment operations, number of abnormal operation tasks and equipment name.
[0009] Determine the load risk score based on the power load value.
[0010] The risk score for power dispatching is calculated and generated based on the duty risk score, operation ticket risk score and load risk score.
[0011] The risk level of current power dispatch is determined based on the risk score of power dispatch.
[0012] Furthermore, the corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the night duty situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the staffing of the duty positions, including:
[0013] A first duty score corresponding to the night shift situation of the on-duty personnel is determined according to whether the on-duty personnel has worked the night shift within the past preset number of days.
[0014] According to whether the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel exceeds the preset frequency, a second duty score corresponding to the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel is determined.
[0015] According to whether the accumulated duty time of the on-duty personnel is lower than the preset time, the third duty score corresponding to the accumulated duty time of the on-duty personnel is determined.
[0016] According to whether the staffing of the duty post is lower than the preset number, the fourth duty score corresponding to the staffing of the duty post is determined.
[0017] A corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the first duty score, the second duty score, the third duty score and the fourth duty score.
[0018] Furthermore, the corresponding operation ticket risk score is determined according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name, including:
[0019] According to whether the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point exceeds a preset number, a first operation ticket score corresponding to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point is determined.
[0020] According to whether there is rainstorm or typhoon weather during the execution of the operation ticket, the second operation ticket score corresponding to the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket is determined.
[0021] A third operation ticket score corresponding to the number of device operations is determined according to whether the number of device operations exceeds a preset number of operations.
[0022] According to whether the number of abnormal operation tasks exceeds the preset number of abnormal tasks, the fourth operation ticket score corresponding to the number of abnormal operation tasks is determined.
[0023] The fifth operation ticket score corresponding to the device name is determined based on whether there are homophones between the device names.
[0024] A corresponding operation ticket risk score is determined according to the first operation ticket score, the second operation ticket score, the third operation ticket score and the fourth operation ticket score.
[0025] Furthermore, determining the load risk score according to the power load value includes:
[0026] Determine the load risk score based on the power load value and the preset load range.
[0027] Furthermore, the risk score of power dispatch is calculated by the following formula:
[0028] W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C
[0029] Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; C is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
[0030] Furthermore, determining the risk level of current power dispatching according to the risk score of power dispatching includes:
[0031] According to the correspondence between the risk score and risk level of power dispatch, the risk score of power dispatch is mapped to the corresponding risk level to obtain the current risk level of power dispatch.
[0032] Based on the above method embodiment, the present invention provides a corresponding device embodiment.
[0033] An embodiment of the present invention provides a risk assessment device for power dispatching, including: a data acquisition module, a duty risk score calculation module, an operation ticket risk score calculation module, a load risk score calculation module, a risk score calculation module and a risk level determination module.
[0034] The data acquisition module is used to obtain duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values; wherein the duty information data includes: the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the personnel configuration of the duty posts; the operation ticket data includes: the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name.
[0035] The duty risk score calculation module is used to determine the corresponding duty risk score according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the personnel configuration of the duty post.
[0036] The operation ticket risk score calculation module is used to determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point, weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name.
[0037] The load risk score calculation module is used to determine the load risk score according to the power load value.
[0038] The comprehensive risk score calculation module is used to calculate and generate the risk score of power dispatching according to the duty risk score, the operation ticket risk score and the load risk score.
[0039] The risk level determination module is used to determine the risk level of the current power dispatch according to the risk score of the power dispatch.
[0040] Furthermore, the comprehensive risk score calculation module calculates and generates the risk score of power dispatching by the following formula:
[0041] W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C
[0042] Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; C is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
[0043] Based on the above method embodiment, the present invention provides a corresponding electronic device embodiment.
[0044] An embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, the risk assessment method for power dispatching described in any one of the above method embodiments can be implemented.
[0045] Based on the above method item embodiments, the present invention provides a corresponding storage medium item embodiment.
[0046] An embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the risk assessment method for power dispatching described in any one of the above method embodiments can be implemented.
[0047] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
[0048] The present invention comprehensively considers the duty information, operation ticket information and power load value, and scores these data in detail to obtain the duty risk score, operation ticket risk score and load risk score, quantifies the specific impact of duty information, operation ticket information and power load value on power dispatching, and provides a solid foundation for subsequent risk assessment. After obtaining these risk scores, further comprehensive calculations are performed based on the duty risk score, operation ticket risk score and load risk score to obtain the overall risk score. Through this comprehensive and multi-level evaluation system, various risk factors in the power dispatching process can be more accurately identified and analyzed, effectively making up for the lack of comprehensiveness of the existing technology in the risk assessment of power dispatching, improving the safety and reliability of power dispatching, and ensuring that the power system maintains stable operation in a complex and changing environment. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0049] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a risk assessment method for power dispatching provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
[0050] Figure 2 It is a structural schematic diagram of a risk assessment device for power dispatching provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0051] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0052] like Figure 1 As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a risk assessment method for power dispatching, which at least includes the following steps:
[0053] Step S1, obtaining duty information data, operation ticket data and power load value; wherein the duty information data includes: the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the personnel configuration of the duty post; the operation ticket data includes: the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name.
[0054] It should be noted that the night shift status of the on-duty personnel refers to whether the on-duty personnel has worked night shifts in a specific time period; the duty frequency refers to the number of times the on-duty personnel are on duty within a certain period of time; the cumulative duty time of the on-duty personnel refers to the cumulative working time of the on-duty personnel; the staffing of the duty post refers to the on-duty personnel in a certain period of time at a certain post; the number of operation tickets at the handover time point refers to the number of operation tickets when the on-duty personnel hand over the shift; the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket refer to whether extreme weather such as heavy rain or typhoon occurs when the current operation ticket is executed; the number of equipment operations refers to the number of times the equipment is operated within a certain period of time; the number of abnormal operation tasks refers to the number of unexpected situations or erroneous tasks that occur when performing operations; the equipment name refers to the identification name of the specific operation equipment.
[0055] Specifically, after the operation of step S1, data processing may be performed on the duty information data, the operation ticket data and the power load value, wherein the data processing includes: cleaning, standardization, formatting, time stamp synchronization and data alignment.
[0056] It is understandable that by acquiring and integrating duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values, a comprehensive perspective is provided for power dispatch risk assessment, which can deeply reveal the working status of duty personnel, operation execution and load characteristics of the power system. Through detailed analysis of this information, the specific impact of various factors on power dispatch can be quantified, thus laying a solid foundation for subsequent risk assessment and ensuring the safe and stable operation of the power system in a complex and changing environment.
[0057] Step S2: Determine the corresponding duty risk score according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the staffing of the duty posts.
[0058] In a preferred embodiment, the corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the staffing of the duty post, including:
[0059] A first duty score corresponding to the night shift situation of the on-duty personnel is determined according to whether the on-duty personnel has worked the night shift within the past preset number of days.
[0060] According to whether the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel exceeds the preset frequency, a second duty score corresponding to the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel is determined.
[0061] According to whether the accumulated duty time of the on-duty personnel is lower than the preset time, the third duty score corresponding to the accumulated duty time of the on-duty personnel is determined.
[0062] According to whether the staffing of the duty post is lower than the preset number, the fourth duty score corresponding to the staffing of the duty post is determined.
[0063] A corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the first duty score, the second duty score, the third duty score and the fourth duty score.
[0064] Exemplarily, based on whether the on-duty personnel has worked night shift in the past 3 days, if so, the first duty score corresponding to the night shift of the on-duty personnel is determined to be 2; based on whether the on-duty personnel's on-duty frequency exceeds 5 times a week, if so, the second duty score corresponding to the on-duty personnel's on-duty frequency is determined to be 5; based on whether the cumulative on-duty time of the on-duty personnel is less than 100 hours, if so, the third duty score corresponding to the cumulative on-duty time of the on-duty personnel is determined to be 2; based on whether the staffing of the duty post is less than 4 people, if so, the fourth duty score corresponding to the staffing of the duty post is determined to be 3; the duty risk score is calculated based on the first duty score, the second duty score, the third duty score, the fourth duty score and the preset weights.
[0065] The preset weights may be adjusted according to actual conditions. In a preferred embodiment, the preset weights are determined according to a hierarchical analysis method or a regression analysis method.
[0066] It is understandable that based on the night shift situation, duty frequency, cumulative duty time and post staffing of the duty personnel, the impact of various indicators on duty risk can be quantified, thereby generating corresponding duty risk scores. By refining the determination process of duty risk scores, the ability to assess the working status of duty personnel is significantly enhanced, ensuring the accurate identification of potential risks, and laying a solid foundation for subsequent comprehensive risk assessment. In addition, the implementation of this method can improve the management efficiency of duty personnel, optimize personnel allocation, and reduce safety hazards caused by improper duty arrangements, thereby improving the overall safety and reliability of power dispatching.
[0067] Step S3: Determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time, weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, number of equipment operations, number of abnormal operation tasks and equipment name.
[0068] Preferably, the method of determining the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name includes:
[0069] According to whether the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point exceeds a preset number, a first operation ticket score corresponding to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point is determined.
[0070] According to whether there is rainstorm or typhoon weather during the execution of the operation ticket, the second operation ticket score corresponding to the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket is determined.
[0071] A third operation ticket score corresponding to the number of device operations is determined according to whether the number of device operations exceeds a preset number of operations.
[0072] According to whether the number of abnormal operation tasks exceeds the preset number of abnormal tasks, the fourth operation ticket score corresponding to the number of abnormal operation tasks is determined.
[0073] The fifth operation ticket score corresponding to the device name is determined based on whether there are homophones between the device names.
[0074] A corresponding operation ticket risk score is determined according to the first operation ticket score, the second operation ticket score, the third operation ticket score and the fourth operation ticket score.
[0075] Exemplarily, based on whether the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point exceeds 3 tickets, if so, the first operation ticket score corresponding to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point is determined to be 5; based on whether there is heavy rain or typhoon weather during the execution of the operation ticket, if so, the second operation ticket score corresponding to the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket is determined to be 5; based on whether the number of equipment operations exceeds 10 times, if so, the third operation ticket score corresponding to the number of equipment operations is determined to be 3; based on whether the number of abnormal operation tasks exceeds 6, the fourth operation ticket score corresponding to the number of abnormal operation tasks is determined to be 4; based on whether there are homophones between the names of the equipment, if so, the fifth operation ticket score corresponding to the equipment name is determined to be 1; the operation ticket risk score is calculated based on the first operation ticket score, the second operation ticket score, the third operation ticket score, the fourth operation ticket score and the preset weight.
[0076] The preset weights may be adjusted according to actual conditions. In a preferred embodiment, the preset weights are determined according to a hierarchical analysis method or a regression analysis method.
[0077] It is understandable that taking into account multiple dimensions that affect the risk of operation tickets, including shift handover time, weather conditions, number of equipment operations, abnormal operation tasks, and homophonic equipment names, enables a comprehensive assessment of the risk of operation tickets, effectively avoids the limitations of single-factor judgment, improves the comprehensiveness and accuracy of operation ticket risk assessment, and provides accurate data support for risk identification in the power dispatching process.
[0078] Step S4: Determine the load risk score according to the power load value.
[0079] Specifically, determining the load risk score according to the power load value includes:
[0080] Determine the load risk score based on the power load value and the preset load range.
[0081] For example, depending on whether the power load value is in the interval of [98000, 100000], if so, the load risk score is determined to be 3; if the power load value exceeds 100000, the load risk score is determined to be 5.
[0082] It is understandable that the introduction of load risk scores makes the risk assessment of power dispatching more scientific and data-based. By setting preset load intervals and comparing the actual power load values with these intervals, the potential risks of power loads can be accurately quantified into specific load risk scores.
[0083] Step S5: Calculate and generate a risk score for power dispatching based on the duty risk score, the operation ticket risk score, and the load risk score.
[0084] In actual operation, the risk score of power dispatch is calculated by the following formula:
[0085] W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C
[0086] Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; C is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
[0087] It can be understood that by integrating the risk scores of the three dimensions of duty risk, operation ticket risk and load risk, and performing comprehensive calculations based on their respective preset weights, this method can comprehensively and systematically evaluate the overall risk level of power dispatching, overcome the limitations of single risk factor analysis, improve the comprehensiveness and accuracy of risk assessment, and help reduce power accidents and failures caused by insufficient risk assessment, ensuring that the power system can operate stably in a complex and changing environment.
[0088] Step S6: Determine the risk level of current power dispatching according to the risk score of power dispatching.
[0089] In an optional embodiment, determining the risk level of current power dispatch according to the risk score of power dispatch includes:
[0090] According to the correspondence between the risk score and risk level of power dispatch, the risk score of power dispatch is mapped to the corresponding risk level to obtain the current risk level of power dispatch.
[0091] Exemplarily, the correspondence between the risk score and the risk level of power dispatching specifically includes:
[0092] When the risk score is in the range of [1,20], the corresponding risk level is level 1; when the risk score is in the range of [21,40], the corresponding risk level is level 2; when the risk score is in the range of [41,60], the corresponding risk level is level 3; when the risk score is in the range of [61,80], the corresponding risk level is level 4; when the risk score is in the range of [81,100], the corresponding risk level is the highest level 5.
[0093] It is understandable that by mapping the risk score of power dispatching to the corresponding risk level, the originally abstract risk score can be visualized and presented to power dispatchers in a more intuitive and understandable way. Different risk levels correspond to different risk levels and potential impacts. After determining the risk level, power dispatchers can formulate corresponding management and response measures for different levels of risks, which helps to optimize resource allocation, improve the efficiency and effectiveness of risk response, improve decision-making efficiency and accuracy, and provide strong guarantees for the safe, efficient and stable operation of the power system.
[0094] Based on the above method embodiment, the present invention provides a corresponding device embodiment.
[0095] like Figure 2As shown, an embodiment of the present invention provides a risk assessment device for power dispatching, including: a data acquisition module 101, a duty risk score calculation module 102, an operation ticket risk score calculation module 103, a load risk score calculation module 104, a risk score calculation module 105 and a risk level determination module 106.
[0096] The data acquisition module 101 is used to acquire duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values. The duty information data includes: the night shift situation of duty personnel, the duty frequency of duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of duty personnel and the personnel configuration of duty posts; the operation ticket data includes: the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the name of the equipment.
[0097] The duty risk score calculation module 102 is used to determine the corresponding duty risk score according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the personnel configuration of the duty post.
[0098] The operation ticket risk score calculation module 103 is used to determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point, weather conditions during the operation ticket execution period, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name.
[0099] The load risk score calculation module 104 is used to determine the load risk score according to the power load value.
[0100] The comprehensive risk score calculation module 105 is used to calculate and generate the risk score of power dispatching according to the duty risk score, the operation ticket risk score and the load risk score.
[0101] The risk level determination module 106 is used to determine the risk level of the current power dispatch according to the risk score of the power dispatch.
[0102] Specifically, the comprehensive risk score calculation module calculates and generates the risk score of power dispatching through the following formula:
[0103] W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C
[0104] Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; C is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
[0105] It should be noted that the embodiments of the device described above correspond to the above embodiments of the present invention, and can implement any of the methods described above in the present invention. In addition, the embodiments of the above-mentioned device are merely schematic, wherein the modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components displayed as modules may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place, or they may be distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the scheme of this embodiment. In addition, in the drawings of the device embodiments provided by the present invention, the connection relationship between the modules indicates that there is a communication connection between them, which can be specifically implemented as one or more communication buses or signal lines. A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand and implement it without paying any creative work.
[0106] Based on the above method embodiment of the present invention, a corresponding electronic device embodiment is provided.
[0107] An embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, comprising a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the risk assessment method for power dispatching described in any one of the present invention is implemented, or, when the processor executes the computer program, the functions of the modules in the above-mentioned device embodiments are implemented.
[0108] Exemplarily, the computer program may be divided into one or more modules, which are stored in the memory and executed by the processor to implement the present invention. The one or more modules may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of implementing specific functions, which are used to describe the execution process of the computer program in the terminal device.
[0109] The terminal device may be a computing device such as a desktop computer, a notebook, a PDA, a cloud server, etc. The terminal device may include, but is not limited to, a processor and a memory.
[0110] The processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. The general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc. The processor is the control center of the terminal device, and uses various interfaces and lines to connect various parts of the entire terminal device.
[0111] The memory can be used to store the computer program and / or module, and the processor realizes various functions of the terminal device by running or executing the computer program and / or module stored in the memory, and calling the data stored in the memory. The memory can mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area can store an operating system, at least one application required for a function, etc.; the data storage area can store data created according to the use of the mobile phone, etc. In addition, the memory can include a high-speed random access memory, and can also include a non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (Smart Media Card, SMC), a secure digital (SecureDigital, SD) card, a flash card (Flash Card), at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device or other volatile solid-state storage device.
[0112] Based on the above method embodiment, the present invention provides a storage medium embodiment;
[0113] Another embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium, which includes a stored computer program, wherein when the computer program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute any of the above-mentioned power dispatching risk assessment methods of the present invention.
[0114] The storage medium is a computer-readable storage medium, and the computer program includes computer program code, which may be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, recording medium, USB flash drive, mobile hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer memory, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium, etc. It should be noted that the content contained in the computer-readable medium may be appropriately increased or decreased according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media do not include electric carrier signals and telecommunication signals.
[0115] In the description of this specification, the description with reference to the terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "example", "specific example" or "some examples" etc. means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present application. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art may combine and combine different embodiments or examples described in this specification and the features of different embodiments or examples, unless they are contradictory.
[0116] The above is a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be pointed out that a person skilled in the art can make several improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present invention. These improvements and modifications are also considered to be within the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims
1. A risk assessment method for power dispatching, characterized in that: include: Obtain duty information data, operation ticket data and power load values; duty information data includes: duty personnel's night shift situation, duty personnel's duty frequency, duty personnel's cumulative duty time and duty post personnel configuration; operation ticket data includes: the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, number of equipment operations, number of abnormal operation tasks and equipment name; Determine the corresponding duty risk score based on the duty personnel's night shift situation, duty personnel's duty frequency, duty personnel's cumulative duty time and duty post personnel allocation; Determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score based on the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time, weather conditions during the operation ticket execution period, number of equipment operations, number of abnormal operation tasks and equipment name; Determine the load risk score based on the power load value; The risk score of power dispatch is calculated based on the duty risk score, operation ticket risk score and load risk score; The risk level of current power dispatch is determined based on the risk score of power dispatch.
2. The risk assessment method for power dispatching according to claim 1, characterized in that: The corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the staffing of the duty positions, including: Determine a first duty score corresponding to the night shift situation of the on-duty personnel according to whether the on-duty personnel has worked night shifts within the past preset number of days; Determine the second duty score corresponding to the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel according to whether the duty frequency of the on-duty personnel exceeds the preset frequency; Determine the third duty score corresponding to the cumulative duty time of the on-duty personnel according to whether the cumulative duty time of the on-duty personnel is less than the preset time; Determine the fourth duty score corresponding to the staffing of the duty post according to whether the staffing of the duty post is lower than the preset number of people; A corresponding duty risk score is determined according to the first duty score, the second duty score, the third duty score and the fourth duty score.
3. The risk assessment method for power dispatching according to claim 2, characterized in that: Determining the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time, weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name includes: Determine the first operation ticket score corresponding to the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point according to whether the number of operation tickets at the shift handover time point exceeds a preset number; According to whether there is rainstorm or typhoon weather during the execution of the operation ticket, determine the second operation ticket score corresponding to the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket; Determine the third operation ticket score corresponding to the number of device operations according to whether the number of device operations exceeds the preset number of operations; Determine the fourth operation ticket score corresponding to the number of abnormal operation tasks according to whether the number of abnormal operation tasks exceeds the preset number of abnormal operation tasks; Determine the fifth operation ticket score corresponding to the device name based on whether there is homophony between the device names; A corresponding operation ticket risk score is determined according to the first operation ticket score, the second operation ticket score, the third operation ticket score and the fourth operation ticket score.
4. The risk assessment method for power dispatching according to claim 3, characterized in that: Determine the load risk score based on the power load value, including: Determine the load risk score based on the power load value and the preset load range.
5. The risk assessment method for power dispatching according to claim 4, characterized in that: The risk score of power dispatch is calculated by the following formula: W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; σ is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
6. The risk assessment method for power dispatching according to claim 1, characterized in that: The risk level of current power dispatch is determined based on the risk score of power dispatch, including: According to the correspondence between the risk score and risk level of power dispatch, the risk score of power dispatch is mapped to the corresponding risk level to obtain the current risk level of power dispatch.
7. A risk assessment device for power dispatching, characterized in that: include: Data acquisition module, duty risk score calculation module, operation ticket risk score calculation module, load risk score calculation module, risk score calculation module and risk level determination module; The data acquisition module is used to acquire duty information data, operation ticket data and power load value; wherein the duty information data includes: the night shift situation of duty personnel, the duty frequency of duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of duty personnel and the personnel configuration of duty posts; the operation ticket data includes: the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, the weather conditions during the execution of the operation ticket, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the name of the equipment; The duty risk score calculation module is used to determine the corresponding duty risk score according to the night shift situation of the duty personnel, the duty frequency of the duty personnel, the cumulative duty time of the duty personnel and the staffing situation of the duty post; The operation ticket risk score calculation module is used to determine the corresponding operation ticket risk score according to the number of operation tickets at the handover time point, the weather conditions during the operation ticket execution period, the number of equipment operations, the number of abnormal operation tasks and the equipment name; The load risk score calculation module is used to determine the load risk score according to the power load value; The comprehensive risk score calculation module is used to calculate and generate the risk score of power dispatching according to the duty risk score, the operation ticket risk score and the load risk score; The risk level determination module is used to determine the risk level of the current power dispatch according to the risk score of the power dispatch.
8. The risk assessment device for power dispatching according to claim 7, characterized in that: The comprehensive risk score calculation module calculates and generates the risk score of power dispatching by the following formula: W=ω A ·A+ω B ·B+ω C ·C Among them, A is the duty risk score; B is the operation ticket risk score; C is the load risk score; W is the risk score of power dispatching; ω A is the weight of the preset duty risk score; ω B is the preset operation ticket risk score; C The weight of the preset load risk score.
9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the risk assessment method for power dispatching described in any one of claims 1 to 6 can be implemented.
10. A storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, it can implement the risk assessment method for power dispatching described in any one of claims 1 to 6.