Intelligent driving safety test system

Through the intelligent driving safety testing system, the problem of difficult to verify vehicle failures in the existing technology is solved, and safety verification and fault response monitoring of intelligent driving functions are realized, ensuring passenger safety.

CN222299972UActive Publication Date: 2025-01-03ZHEJIANG ZEEKR INTELLIGENT TECH CO LTD +1
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202420167318.8
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Utility models(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-01-23
Publication Date
2025-01-03
Estimated Expiration
2034-01-23

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The existing intelligent driving function testing technology is difficult to effectively verify the problem of vehicle failures, and it is difficult to reproduce the fault scenarios, so it is impossible to fully guarantee the safety of the intelligent driving function.

Method used

An intelligent driving safety testing system was designed, including a fault injection device, an intelligent driving function operation device and a fault monitoring device. By simulating various faults, monitoring the response and processing methods of intelligent driving functions, the operability and repeatability of faults are achieved. verify.

Benefits of technology

The security protection of intelligent driving functions is realized in a laboratory environment, and the faults can be verified in large quantities and repeatedly, ensuring the response and processing capabilities of intelligent driving functions when encountering various faults, and solving the problem that real cars are difficult to reproduce fault testing.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN222299972U_ABST
    Figure CN222299972U_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The utility model provides an intelligent driving safety test system, the intelligent driving safety test system is connected with each associated system of a vehicle, and the test system comprises a fault injection device, an intelligent driving function operation device and a fault monitoring device, the intelligent driving function operation device is respectively connected with the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device, and the fault injection device comprises at least one fault to be injected; the intelligent driving function operation device comprises an intelligent driving controller connected with the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device, and the intelligent driving controller carries out safety test on the vehicle based on the fault to be injected and outputs a safety test result to the fault monitoring device. The method has operability and repeatability, and can effectively verify real vehicle fault problems.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of automobile testing technology, and in particular to an intelligent driving safety testing system. Background Art

[0002] As intelligent driving technology becomes more mature, mainstream automakers have begun to deploy high-level intelligent driving technology. Intelligent driving functions are being applied in more and more driving scenarios, which brings convenience to users while also posing safety challenges. Especially in the face of emergencies or failures, how to ensure the safety of passengers under intelligent driving is the focus and difficulty of intelligent driving function technology.

[0003] Throughout the entire process of intelligent driving safety development, the verification of fault scenarios is dangerous, has low probability, and is difficult to build an environment, which is a challenge to traditional intelligent driving function testing technology.

[0004] At present, the ADAS (Advanced Driving Assistance System) controller, perception simulation module, scenario simulation module and vehicle dynamics simulation module to be tested are loaded into the simulation test software through the simulation test platform. The ADAS controller to be tested generates decision instructions based on the perception simulation data and scenario simulation model, and the vehicle dynamics model performs simulation test based on the decision instructions. However, this test method is only applicable to the verification of functional scenarios and cannot effectively verify real vehicle fault problems. Utility Model Content

[0005] In order to overcome the problems existing in the related technology, this specification provides an intelligent driving safety testing system that is operational and repeatable, and can realize large-scale and repeated verification of faults. The closed-loop intelligent driving safety testing system can respond to various faults, and the response can be monitored.

[0006] The intelligent driving safety test system is connected to each associated system of the vehicle. The test system includes: a fault injection device, an intelligent driving function operation device and a fault monitoring device. The intelligent driving function operation device is connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device respectively, wherein:

[0007] The fault injection device includes at least one fault to be injected;

[0008] The intelligent driving function operation device includes an intelligent driving controller connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device. The intelligent driving controller performs a safety test on the vehicle based on the fault to be injected and outputs the safety test result to the fault monitoring device.

[0009] Optionally, the intelligent driving function operation device also includes a control cabinet, which is respectively connected to the fault injection device and the intelligent driving controller, and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected.

[0010] Optionally, the control cabinet includes a power supply control device, which includes a first fault injection interface connected to the fault injection device and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the first fault injection interface.

[0011] Optionally, the control cabinet includes a signal control device, which includes a second fault injection interface connected to the fault injection device and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the second fault injection interface.

[0012] Optionally, the control cabinet includes a wiring harness interface device, which includes a third fault injection interface, connected to the fault injection device, and used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the third fault injection interface.

[0013] Optionally, the intelligent driving function operation device further includes a workstation cabinet, and the workstation cabinet is connected to the control cabinet via Ethernet;

[0014] The workstation cabinet includes an electronic device integrated with at least one simulation software, and the electronic device is connected to the workstation cabinet via Ethernet.

[0015] Optionally, the intelligent driving controller includes a first fault monitoring interface;

[0016] The fault monitoring device includes a central control display, which is connected to the first fault monitoring interface and is used to control the central control display to monitor the response of the intelligent driving controller to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the first fault monitoring interface.

[0017] Optionally, the intelligent driving controller further includes a second fault monitoring interface;

[0018] The fault monitoring device includes an instrument display, which is connected to the second fault monitoring interface and is used to control the instrument display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the second fault monitoring interface.

[0019] Optionally, the intelligent driving controller further includes a third fault monitoring interface;

[0020] The fault monitoring device includes a head-up display, which is connected to the third fault monitoring interface and is used to control the head-up display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the third fault monitoring interface.

[0021] Optionally, the intelligent driving controller further includes a fourth fault monitoring interface;

[0022] The fault monitoring device includes a steering wheel, which is connected to the fourth fault monitoring interface and is used to control the steering wheel to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the fourth fault monitoring interface.

[0023] In the embodiments of this specification, the intelligent driving safety test system is connected to each associated system of the vehicle. The test system includes a fault injection device, an intelligent driving function operation device and a fault monitoring device. The intelligent driving function operation device is respectively connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device, so that the system can simulate various faults that occur when users use the intelligent driving function, monitor the response and processing methods of the intelligent driving function to various faults, thereby realizing the protection of the safety of the intelligent driving function in a laboratory environment, so that the fault can be verified in large quantities and repeatedly. Moreover, the fault injection content in the fault injection device is all operable and repeatable, and all have an operable fault injection interface and implementation method, which can simulate or replicate various fault contents in the real car environment, solving the technical problem that it is difficult to perform various fault safety tests on real vehicles.

[0024] It is to be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present specification. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the specification and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the specification.

[0026] Figure 1 is a structural block diagram of an intelligent driving safety test system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present specification;

[0027] Figure 2 It is a structural block diagram of an intelligent driving function operation device shown in this specification according to an exemplary embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application clearer, the technical solutions in this application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in this application. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of this application, not all of them. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0029] The terms used in this application are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit this application. Unless otherwise defined, the technical terms or scientific terms used in this application should be understood by people with ordinary skills in the field to which this application belongs. The words "first", "second" and similar words used in the specification and claims of this application do not indicate any order, quantity or importance, but are only used to distinguish different components. Similarly, words such as "one" or "one" do not indicate a quantitative limit, but indicate that there is at least one. "Multiple" or "several" means two or more. "Including" or "including" and similar words mean that the elements or objects appearing in front of "including" or "including" include the elements or objects listed after "including" or "including" and their equivalents, and do not exclude other elements or objects. "Connected" or "connected" and similar words are not limited to physical or mechanical connections, and can include electrical connections, whether direct or indirect.

[0030] The terms used in this application are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit this application. The singular forms of "a", "said" and "the" used in this application are also intended to include plural forms, unless the context clearly indicates other meanings. It should also be understood that the term "and / or" used in this article refers to and includes any or all possible combinations of one or more associated listed items.

[0031] The present application provides an intelligent driving safety test system. The present application is described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the absence of conflict, the features of the following embodiments and implementations can be combined with each other.

[0032] The vehicles of the embodiments of the present application include but are not limited to sedans, SUVs, off-road vehicles, pickup trucks or other power-driven non-track-borne vehicles, and have the conventional structure and functions of vehicles currently on the market, which will not be specifically introduced herein.

[0033] The intelligent driving controller of the embodiment of the present application has the conventional structure, functions and algorithms of the intelligent driving function controllers currently on the market, and will not be specifically introduced in this article.

[0034] Figure 1Shown is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the intelligent driving safety testing system of the present application. The intelligent driving safety testing system is connected to various associated systems of the vehicle, such as the steering system, the braking system, etc.

[0035] Intelligent driving functions are being applied in more and more driving scenarios in vehicles. How to ensure the safety of passengers under intelligent driving is the focus of intelligent driving function technology. However, since the faults involved in intelligent driving functions are relatively complex and difficult to reproduce in the actual vehicle test environment, the intelligent driving function test through the simulation test platform is only suitable for the verification of functional scenarios, and cannot effectively verify the actual vehicle fault problems.

[0036] In order to solve the above technical problems, this specification provides an intelligent driving safety testing system that is operational and repeatable.

[0037] By simulating various faults that may occur when users use the intelligent driving function and monitoring the response and handling methods of the intelligent driving function to various faults, the safety of the intelligent driving function can be protected in a laboratory environment, allowing the faults to be verified in large quantities and repeatedly.

[0038] In some embodiments, Figure 1 As shown, the intelligent driving safety test system includes a fault injection device 100, an intelligent driving function operation device 200 and a fault monitoring device 300; the intelligent driving function operation device is the core control unit of the test system, which is respectively connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device.

[0039] The fault injection device includes at least one fault to be injected and a fault injection implementation method of the fault to be injected, including software level and hardware level.

[0040] The faults to be injected in the fault injection device described in this article are all operable and repeatable, and can simulate or replicate various fault contents in the real vehicle environment, solving the problem that it is difficult to perform various fault safety tests on the real vehicle.

[0041] The main body of the intelligent driving function operation device is an intelligent driving simulation bench, which includes various software and hardware, and can realize closed-loop simulation operation of the intelligent driving function.

[0042] The intelligent driving function operation device described in this article includes an intelligent driving controller connected to a fault injection device and a fault monitoring device.

[0043] The fault monitoring device includes at least one monitoring method for the intelligent driving function to respond to various faults to be injected, and the monitoring method includes software level and hardware level.

[0044] At least one fault to be injected is provided through a fault injection device and injected into the intelligent driving controller of the intelligent driving function operation device. The algorithm integrated in the internal chip of the intelligent driving controller performs planning and decision-making, and outputs a safety test result. The safety test result is used to control the operation of the vehicle used for safety testing, forming a functional closed loop; and the fault monitoring device monitors the response of the intelligent driving controller to the fault to be injected, and transmits it to the user in an intuitive manner, thereby completing the safety test of the intelligent driving function.

[0045] The fault injection device includes different fault types, basically covering all faults involved in intelligent driving functions, and all have operable fault injection interfaces and implementation methods.

[0046] The faults to be injected include the main power supply and the short-circuit control faults of each controller. Such faults are connected to the intelligent driving function operation device through the power cord and its connectors for fault injection. It should be noted that the controller hardware involved in this test system has a unified power supply source; all controller hardware is located in the control cabinet of the intelligent driving function operation device, and the control cabinet is equipped with an operable disconnect and short-circuit interface. Therefore, the power disconnection and short-circuit control of all controller hardware can be easily achieved. The control block cabinet of the intelligent driving function operation device will be described in detail below.

[0047] The faults to be injected also include faults of the simulated fault signal injection control type, which are connected to the intelligent driving function operation device through various buses (including CAN, Lin, FlexRay, etc.) for fault injection. When the intelligent driving function associated system fails, a corresponding fault signal will be sent to the intelligent driving function test system to characterize its fault state. Therefore, the interface can simulate the sending of corresponding fault signals through CANOE devices or other bus devices to reproduce various fault states of the associated system.

[0048] The faults to be injected also include faults caused by poor wiring harness contact control, which are connected to the intelligent driving function operation device through wiring harness replacement or abnormal connection for fault injection. This method can replicate the faults caused by loose wiring harness, poor contact, interface wear and other problems related to the intelligent driving function caused by long-term use or other factors in the real car environment.

[0049] The faults to be injected also include chassis dynamics fault control faults, which are connected to the intelligent driving function operation device by inputting parameters for fault injection. Chassis domain dynamics control is implemented by dynamics simulation software, so chassis dynamics related faults can be created by modifying relevant parameters in the dynamics simulation software, such as modifying the motor parameters in the power steering system to simulate the failure of the power steering system.

[0050] The faults to be injected also include faults in dangerous boundary scene construction, which are injected by building scenes in simulation software and transmitting corresponding data to the intelligent driving function operation device. Specifically, some fault scenarios caused by extreme environments can be simulated, such as severe weather such as heavy rain, hail, and sandstorms, which can cause visual obstruction and other faults in the intelligent driving camera sensor.

[0051] The faults to be injected also include intelligent driving controller reliability replacement faults, which are injected by hardware replacement or environmental changes. The safety test system in this manual includes the intelligent driving controller hardware, and the controller hardware faults are verified by changing the placement environment of the controller hardware. For example, the controller hardware can be installed in a high temperature or high cold environment container to reproduce the faults in the corresponding environment; if the durability of the controller hardware needs to be verified, it can be directly replaced with old parts.

[0052] The faults to be injected also include other controller hardware reliability replacement faults, which are implemented by hardware replacement or environment change. Other controller hardware connected to the safety test system in this specification verifies the fault of the controller hardware itself by changing the placement environment of the controller hardware.

[0053] In this embodiment, compared with the existing simulation tests for basic functions of intelligent driving that aim to improve test efficiency and reduce test costs, the fault injection device of this specification can simulate more than seven types of faults, including power supply faults, hardware faults, bus faults, scenario faults, etc., basically covering all faults involved in intelligent driving functions. It is operational and repeatable, and solves the problem that it is difficult to conduct fault safety tests on real vehicles.

[0054] like Figure 2 As shown, the intelligent driving function operation device includes a control cabinet 20 connected to the fault injection device and the intelligent driving controller respectively. The control cabinet 20 is the most important component of the entire intelligent driving function operation device. It is used to connect the control cabinet and the intelligent driving controller hardware through various buses according to the fault to be injected, so as to complete various information interactions with the controller hardware and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety tests on the vehicle.

[0055] In some embodiments, the control cabinet includes a real-time simulator, which is connected to the intelligent driving controller and is used to generate a whole vehicle simulation model. The whole vehicle simulation model provides a complete virtual environment for the controller hardware-in-the-loop test system, and the I / O signals and CAN signals corresponding to the intelligent driving controller are matched through hardware boards to achieve seamless connection between the whole vehicle simulation model and the input and output signals of the intelligent driving controller, thereby forming a closed-loop test environment. Specifically, the whole vehicle simulation model is connected to the intelligent driving controller, and the equipment in the control cabinet generates fault injection signals through simulation or real vehicle simulation, and these signals are input to the intelligent driving controller. After the intelligent driving controller performs calculations and decisions according to the internal algorithm, the instructions are sent back to the whole vehicle simulation model of the control cabinet through the bus to form a closed-loop test.

[0056] The control cabinet also includes a power supply control device 21, which is used to control the power supply and power switch of all controller hardware in the safety test system. As an example, the power supply control device includes a short-circuit test box, and the open circuit test box is configured with an operable open circuit interface and a short circuit interface, that is, a first fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device through the first fault injection interface, and is used to inject the main power supply and each controller open circuit control type fault into the intelligent driving controller through the power cord and its connector, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle.

[0057] The control cabinet also includes a signal control device 22 for receiving and sending all bus signals in the safety test system. As an example, the signal control device includes a second fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to inject simulated fault signals into the control-type fault injection intelligent driving controller through various buses, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety tests on the vehicle. Exemplarily, the signal control device includes a signal conditioner, a power amplifier, a signal amplifier, a voltage-current converter, a signal collector, and the like.

[0058] The control cabinet also includes a harness interface device 23, which is used to provide a connection for the main harness in the safety test system through a connector. As an example, the harness interface device includes a third fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to inject a fault of poor harness contact control into the intelligent driving controller by replacing the harness or abnormal connection, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle.

[0059] The control cabinet is the most important component of the entire intelligent driving control device. In addition to providing an integrated environment for software and hardware, it can also perform unified scheduling and control of all integrated devices through control software.

[0060] The intelligent driving function operation device also includes a workstation cabinet 24, which is connected to the control cabinet via Ethernet. The workstation cabinet is mainly responsible for the integration of the workstation and the information processing and transmission of various software.

[0061] The workstation cabinet includes an electronic device that integrates at least one simulation software. The electronic device is connected to the workstation cabinet via Ethernet and is used to build a whole vehicle simulation model that interacts with the intelligent driving controller for information, and controls the operation of the vehicle based on the safety test results output by the whole vehicle simulation model and the intelligent driving controller.

[0062] In some embodiments, the workstation cabinet includes a dynamics software terminal 25. The terminal described herein represents a personal computer with a processor, a network interface, a memory, etc., and a dynamics software (exemplarily, the dynamics software uses mature commercial software, such as carsim, carmaker, etc.) is running inside the terminal, which is used to build a vehicle dynamics simulation model according to the dynamics software. As an example, the dynamics software terminal includes a fourth fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to inject the chassis dynamics fault control class fault into the intelligent driving controller by modifying the relevant parameters in the dynamics simulation software, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle.

[0063] The workstation cabinet also includes a scenario simulation software terminal 26. The terminal described herein represents a personal computer with a processor, a network interface, a memory, etc., and a scenario simulation software is running inside it (exemplarily, the scenario simulation software uses mature commercial software, such as VTD, PreScan, etc., which is used to provide scene images and convert them into video streams to the intelligent driving controller), which is used to build a dangerous boundary scenario simulation model according to the scenario simulation software. As an example, the scenario simulation software terminal includes a fifth fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to transmit the data of the dangerous boundary scene built in the simulation software to the intelligent driving controller to inject a fault of the dangerous boundary scene construction class, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle.

[0064] The workstation cabinet also includes an automated test software terminal 27. The terminal described herein represents a personal computer with a processor, a network interface, a memory, etc., and an automated test software is running inside it (exemplarily, the automated test software uses mature commercial software, such as ECUTest, etc.), which is used to run automated test cases according to the automated test software. As an example, the automated test software terminal includes a sixth fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform automated safety testing on the vehicle by importing the automated test case into the automated test software.

[0065] The workstation described in this article and various software in the terminal are connected via Ethernet.

[0066] The intelligent driving function operation device also includes the intelligent driving controller 28, which is used for fault injection testing of the safety of the intelligent driving function, wherein the intelligent driving controller may also include multiple controller hardware as a system. As an example, the intelligent driving controller includes a seventh fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to inject a fault of the reliability replacement class of the intelligent driving controller into the intelligent driving controller according to the method of hardware replacement or environmental change, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle.

[0067] The intelligent driving function operation device also includes other controller hardware 29, that is, controller hardware connected to the intelligent driving controller that does not require simulation. Among them, other controller hardware is connected to the intelligent driving controller using the original connection method. As an example, the intelligent driving controller includes an eighth fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device, and is used to inject the reliability replacement class fault of the intelligent driving controller into the intelligent driving controller according to the method of hardware replacement or environmental change, and control the intelligent driving controller to perform safety testing on the vehicle.

[0068] In this embodiment, an intelligent driving function operation device that can realize functional closed-loop operation is provided. In addition to realizing the simulated operation of the intelligent driving function, the device also provides various fault injection interface methods, solving the technical problem that fault injection requires the intelligent driving function to respond in a closed loop.

[0069] At present, the simulation realization of intelligent driving functions only considers the functional closed loop, but does not consider the open interface. The intelligent driving function operation device provided in this specification provides multiple fault injection interfaces and multiple fault monitoring interfaces. While realizing the functional closed loop, it can also interact with external devices. As an example, the intelligent driving controller includes at least one fault monitoring interface.

[0070] The fault monitoring device includes monitoring methods for different fault responses, which are intuitive and operational, and some of them can be automated, solving the technical problems of monitoring fault responses of intelligent driving functions.

[0071] In some embodiments, the fault monitoring device includes a central control display, which is connected to the first fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller by a hardware harness, and is used to control the central control display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the first fault monitoring interface. That is, through the central control display monitoring method, an external central control display is used to monitor the intelligent driving's response to the fault injection, such as an alarm text reminder, an alarm image reminder, etc.

[0072] The fault monitoring device also includes an instrument display, which is connected to the second fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller by a hardware harness, and is used to control the instrument display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the second fault monitoring interface. That is, through the instrument display monitoring method, an external instrument display is used to monitor the intelligent driving's response to the fault injection, such as alarm text reminder, alarm image reminder, etc.

[0073] The fault monitoring device also includes a head-up display, which is connected to the third fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller by a hardware harness, and is used to control the head-up display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the third fault monitoring interface. That is, through the head-up display monitoring method, an external head-up display is used to monitor the response of the intelligent driving to the fault injection, such as an alarm text reminder, an alarm image reminder, etc.

[0074] The fault monitoring device also includes a steering wheel, which is connected to the fourth fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller by a hardware harness, and is used to control the steering wheel to monitor the response of the intelligent driving controller to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the fourth fault monitoring interface. That is, by means of steering wheel vibration monitoring, an external steering wheel is used to monitor the response of the intelligent driving to the fault injection, such as steering wheel vibration reminder, etc.

[0075] The fault monitoring device also includes an alarm, which is connected to the fifth fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller by a hardware harness, and is used to control the steering wheel to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the fifth fault monitoring interface. That is, by means of alarm vibration monitoring, an external alarm is used to monitor the response of the intelligent driving to the fault injection, such as an alarm sound reminder, etc.

[0076] The fault monitoring device also includes a scene simulation software monitoring method in the scene simulation software terminal, which is connected to the sixth fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller and displayed through the scene simulation software. That is, for the response of intelligent driving to the fault, by observing the simulated vehicle performance in the scene simulation software, it is judged whether its response method is reasonable. For example, for the fault scenario where the intelligent driving function cannot be used normally in bad weather, it can be observed whether the vehicle in the scene software can smoothly exit the function and park safely, etc.

[0077] The fault monitoring device also includes an automated test software monitoring method in the automated test software terminal, which is connected to the seventh fault monitoring interface of the intelligent driving controller and displayed through the scene simulation software. That is, the response of the intelligent driving to the fault can be realized by logical verification of the relevant signals, and a test case is formed for automated verification, that is, the condition for the occurrence of the fault is used as the execution step of the case, and the fault response feedback information of the intelligent driving is used as the judgment condition for whether the case passes or not, so that the intelligent driving fault response can be automatically monitored.

[0078] In this embodiment, compared with the current observation of simulation test results, which is mainly presented through scenario simulation software and use case test results, the response of intelligent driving to faults in this application is more directly conveyed to the driver, such as literary prompts, alarm sound prompts, steering wheel vibration prompts, etc. The fault monitoring device provided by this application includes at least seven fault monitoring methods, which basically cover all forms of display of intelligent driving responses to faults, and are all intuitive and operable.

[0079] The above is a description of a specific embodiment of the specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recorded in the claims can be performed in an order different from that in the embodiments and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific order or continuous order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0080] Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate other embodiments of the specification after considering the specification and practicing the invention claimed herein. The specification is intended to cover any variations, uses or adaptations of the specification that follow the general principles of the specification and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art that are not claimed in the specification. The specification and examples are to be considered exemplary only, and the true scope and spirit of the specification are indicated by the following claims.

[0081] It should be understood that the present description is not limited to the precise structures that have been described above and shown in the drawings, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present description is limited only by the appended claims.

[0082] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of this specification should be included in the scope of protection of this specification.

Claims

1. An intelligent driving safety testing system, characterized in that: The test system is connected to each associated system of the vehicle, and the test system includes: a fault injection device, an intelligent driving function operation device and a fault monitoring device, wherein the intelligent driving function operation device is respectively connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device, wherein: The fault injection device includes at least one fault to be injected; The intelligent driving function operation device includes an intelligent driving controller connected to the fault injection device and the fault monitoring device. The intelligent driving controller performs a safety test on the vehicle based on the fault to be injected and outputs the safety test result to the fault monitoring device.

2. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The intelligent driving function operation device also includes a control cabinet, which is respectively connected to the fault injection device and the intelligent driving controller, and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected.

3. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The control cabinet includes a power supply control device, which includes a first fault injection interface connected to the fault injection device and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the first fault injection interface.

4. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The control cabinet includes a signal control device, which includes a second fault injection interface connected to the fault injection device and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the second fault injection interface.

5. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The control cabinet includes a wiring harness interface device, which includes a third fault injection interface, which is connected to the fault injection device and is used to control the intelligent driving controller to perform a safety test on the vehicle according to the fault to be injected input through the third fault injection interface.

6. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The intelligent driving function operation device also includes a workstation cabinet, and the workstation cabinet is connected to the control cabinet via Ethernet; The workstation cabinet includes an electronic device integrated with at least one simulation software, and the electronic device is connected to the workstation cabinet via Ethernet.

7. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The intelligent driving controller includes a first fault monitoring interface; The fault monitoring device includes a central control display, which is connected to the first fault monitoring interface and is used to control the central control display to monitor the response of the intelligent driving controller to the fault to be injected according to the safety test result output through the first fault monitoring interface.

8. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The intelligent driving controller also includes a second fault monitoring interface; The fault monitoring device includes an instrument display, which is connected to the second fault monitoring interface and is used to control the instrument display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the second fault monitoring interface.

9. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The intelligent driving controller also includes a third fault monitoring interface; The fault monitoring device includes a head-up display, which is connected to the third fault monitoring interface and is used to control the head-up display to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the third fault monitoring interface.

10. The intelligent driving safety testing system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The intelligent driving controller also includes a fourth fault monitoring interface; The fault monitoring device includes a steering wheel, which is connected to the fourth fault monitoring interface and is used to control the steering wheel to monitor the intelligent driving controller's response to the fault to be injected based on the safety test result output through the fourth fault monitoring interface.