Method and device for checking human factor conformity of nuclear power plant equipment arrangement
By using automated human-caused compliance inspection methods based on three-dimensional models in nuclear power plants, the problem of time-consuming and labor-intensive and easy-to-missage inspection of equipment arrangement is solved, and efficient and reliable automatic inspection results are achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411559969.2
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-11-04
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-18
AI Technical Summary
Nuclear power plant equipment is time-consuming and labor-intensive when inspecting human compliance, and is prone to omissions. The existing manual inspection methods have problems such as high time consumption, relying on professional skills, and lack of timeliness.
Through an automated inspection method based on three-dimensional model, equipment classification is carried out based on the equipment's attribute information and preset classification rules, and the preset human-cause engineering standard library and human-cause compliance inspection tool library can be used to automatically human-cause equipment of different categories of equipment by combining the preset human-cause engineering standard library and human-cause compliance inspection tool library. Due to compliance inspection.
It greatly improves inspection efficiency, reduces time and manpower consumption, improves the timeliness and integrity of inspections, and improves the reliability of human compliance inspections through objective judgment standards.
Smart Images
Figure CN119477276A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The invention relates to the field of human factors engineering design, and in particular to a method and a device for checking human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant. Background Art
[0002] Nuclear power plants are complex large-scale engineering projects, and their safe and stable operation depends on a large number of technical systems, and the normal operation of these technical systems depends on the reliable operation of equipment. The reliable operation of equipment requires regular maintenance of the equipment, and on-site inspections and operations when necessary. However, problems such as equipment installation too high, insufficient maintenance space, and inaccessibility on-site equipment bring inconvenience to the operation and maintenance of equipment. The root cause of these problems is that the human factors compliance of equipment layout was not fully checked during the construction of nuclear power plants.
[0003] The 3D model design currently used can greatly avoid conflicts in equipment layout positions, and various manual inspection methods such as 3D design review and joint inspection before the system is handed over to the owner can be used to troubleshoot equipment layout problems. This inspection method has many shortcomings: (1) The workload of manual inspection is large and takes a lot of time; (2) Manual inspection relies on the professional skills and work experience of the inspectors; (3) There are many pieces of equipment in nuclear power plants, and manual inspection may miss some items; (4) Manual inspection is not timely enough, and changes need to be made after problems are found, which has high change costs. Summary of the invention
[0004] In view of the above defects of the prior art, the present invention provides a method and device for checking the human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant, so as to solve the technical problems that the human factors compliance inspection in a nuclear power plant is time-consuming, labor-intensive and easy to miss.
[0005] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose and other related purposes, the present invention provides a method for checking the human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant, a method for checking the human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant, comprising: obtaining attribute information of each equipment in the nuclear power plant according to a three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant; obtaining a category of each equipment according to the attribute information of each equipment and a preset classification rule; obtaining the human factors engineering requirement of each equipment according to the category of each equipment and a preset human factors engineering criterion library; performing a human factors compliance check on each equipment according to the human factors engineering requirement of each equipment and a preset human factors compliance check tool library to obtain an inspection result.
[0006] In one embodiment of the present invention, the category of each of the devices is obtained based on the attribute information of each of the devices and the preset classification rules, including: preliminarily classifying each of the devices based on the attribute information of each of the devices and the preset device type; and secondary classifying each of the devices based on the attribute information of each of the devices and the preset device characteristics.
[0007] In one embodiment of the present invention, the ergonomic requirements of each of the devices are obtained according to the category of each of the devices and a preset ergonomic criteria library, including: according to the category of each of the devices and a preset ergonomic criteria library, the general ergonomic requirements and special ergonomic requirements of each of the devices are obtained.
[0008] In one embodiment of the present invention, the general ergonomic requirements include maintenance space requirements, installation height requirements, passage requirements, and accessibility requirements.
[0009] In one embodiment of the present invention, the special ergonomic requirements include visibility requirements or equipment component accessibility requirements.
[0010] In one embodiment of the present invention, a human factors compliance check is performed on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library, including: obtaining a maintenance space virtual body of each device according to the maintenance space requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library; loading the maintenance space virtual body of each device into the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and checking whether there is a collision between the maintenance space virtual body and surrounding devices.
[0011] In one embodiment of the present invention, a human factors compliance check is performed on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library, including: obtaining a human channel virtual body of each device according to the channel requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library; loading the human channel virtual body of each device into the doorway of the room where the device is located in the three-dimensional model, and simulating the path of the human channel virtual body walking from the doorway to the device, and detecting whether there is a collision between the human channel virtual body and surrounding devices during the walking process.
[0012] In one embodiment of the present invention, a human factors compliance check is performed on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library, including: obtaining a virtual body of a personnel reachable domain for each device according to the accessibility requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library; loading the virtual body of a personnel reachable domain for each device into the personnel reserved space at the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and checking whether the device is within the reachable domain.
[0013] In one embodiment of the present invention, a human factors compliance check is performed on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library, including: obtaining a personnel visual field virtual body of each device according to the visibility requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance check tool library; loading the personnel visual field virtual body of each device into the personnel reserved space at the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and checking whether the device that needs to be read is within the visual field.
[0014] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose and other related purposes, the present invention also provides a nuclear power plant equipment layout human factors compliance inspection device, including: a data acquisition unit, used to obtain the attribute information of each equipment in the nuclear power plant according to the three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant; a classification unit, used to obtain the category of each equipment according to the attribute information of each equipment and a preset classification rule; a requirement acquisition unit, used to obtain the human factors engineering requirements of each equipment according to the category of each equipment and a preset human factors engineering criterion library; an inspection unit, used to perform human factors compliance inspection on each equipment according to the human factors engineering requirements of each equipment and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, and obtain an inspection result.
[0015] Beneficial effects of the present invention: The present invention proposes a method and device for checking the human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant. The method first classifies the equipment according to a preset classification rule, and then maps different inspection tools to different categories of equipment in combination with a preset human factors engineering criteria library and a human factors compliance inspection tool library to realize automatic inspection of human factors compliance. Through automatic inspection, the efficiency of the inspection is greatly improved, the time and manpower consumed in the inspection work are reduced, and the timeliness and completeness of the inspection are also improved. At the same time, the automatic inspection adopts an objective judgment standard to improve the reliability of the human factors compliance inspection. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.
[0017] Figure 1 A first flow chart of a human factors compliance inspection method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0018] Figure 2 A flow chart of equipment classification provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0019] Figure 3A check flow chart corresponding to the maintenance space requirement provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0020] Figure 4 A check flow chart corresponding to the channel requirements provided in one embodiment of the present invention;
[0021] Figure 5 A check flow chart corresponding to the reachability requirement provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0022] Figure 6 A check flow chart corresponding to the visibility requirement provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0023] Figure 7 A second flow chart of a human factors compliance inspection method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0024] Figure 8 A schematic diagram of the structure of a human factors compliance checking method provided by one embodiment of the present invention.
[0025] Explanation of reference numerals: 101, data acquisition unit; 102, classification unit; 103, requirement acquisition unit; 104, inspection unit. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] The following describes the embodiments of the present invention through specific specific embodiments, and those skilled in the art can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present invention from the contents disclosed in this specification. It should be noted that the following embodiments and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other without conflict. In addition to the specific methods, equipment, and materials used in the embodiments, according to the technical personnel in this technical field's grasp of the prior art and the records of the present invention, any methods, equipment, and materials of the prior art that are similar or equivalent to the methods, equipment, and materials described in the embodiments of the present invention can also be used to implement the present invention.
[0027] It should be understood that the terms used in the embodiments of the present invention are for describing specific embodiments rather than for limiting the scope of protection of the present invention. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used in the present invention have the same meaning as those generally understood by those skilled in the art.
[0028] In the following description, numerous details are discussed to provide a more thorough explanation of the embodiments of the present invention. However, it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented without these specific details. In some of the embodiments, well-known structures and devices are shown in the form of block diagrams rather than in detail to avoid making the embodiments of the present invention difficult to understand.
[0029] The flowchart and block diagram in the accompanying drawings illustrate the system architecture, functions and operations that may be implemented according to the methods and computer program products of various embodiments disclosed in the present invention. In this regard, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, a program segment, or a part of a code, and the module, the program segment, or a part of the code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in a different order from the order marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram and / or the flowchart, and the combination of the boxes in the block diagram and / or the flowchart can be implemented with a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or can be implemented with a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.
[0030] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 A method for checking human factors compliance of equipment layout in a nuclear power plant provided in one embodiment of the present invention includes steps S100 to S400.
[0031] Step S100: Obtain attribute information of each device in the nuclear power plant according to the three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant. There are many devices in the nuclear power plant, and the three-dimensional model will be designed in advance during the design process. The three-dimensional model is a technology that uses three-dimensional geometric shapes to represent objects. It is widely used in engineering, architecture, design, manufacturing and other fields. The three-dimensional model generally contains the geometric size, position, direction and posture, material properties, connection and assembly information, performance parameters, safety characteristics and other information of the equipment. Therefore, the attribute information of each device can be obtained through the three-dimensional model. The attribute information is mainly used for the subsequent classification of the equipment, and the appropriate attribute information can be selected according to the preset classification rules.
[0032] Step S200: Get the category of each device according to the attribute information of each device and the preset classification rules. The preset classification rules define the categories of devices and the device attribute information corresponding to each category from the beginning. After the definition, the device can be classified according to the attribute information of the device obtained in step S100.
[0033] See also Figure 2In a specific embodiment of the present invention, step S200 includes: S201, preliminarily classifying each device according to the attribute information of each device and the preset device type; S202, secondary classifying each device according to the attribute information of each device and the preset device characteristics. Taking common devices as an example, in step S201, for example, the devices can be divided into instruments, valves, panels and cabinets, etc. In addition, there can be other classifications, which can be set according to the actual usage scenarios. For step S202, the following uses instruments and valves as examples to illustrate how to perform secondary classification.
[0034] Instruments are devices used to measure, monitor and control physical quantities (such as temperature, pressure, flow, liquid level, etc.) in industrial processes. They can be simple mechanical devices or complex electronic or computer systems. Instruments can be secondary classified according to the way the readings are read, resulting in local display instruments and remote transmission instruments. Local display instruments are installed directly near the equipment and are used to display the measured values on site, such as pressure gauges, thermometers, etc. In addition to normal maintenance work such as instrument calibration, these instruments also involve on-site readings during normal operation, so it is necessary to pay attention to the needs of instrument readings. The measured values of remote transmission instruments are transmitted to remote locations such as control rooms or monitoring centers through electrical or wireless signals for recording, analysis or control. These instruments do not need to be read on site, and their readings are displayed remotely such as in the main control room, so the main focus is on instrument maintenance requirements.
[0035] A valve is a device used to control the flow of fluids (such as liquids, gases, and steam). It can open, close, or regulate the flow of fluids to meet the needs of industrial processes. Valves can be secondary classified according to the way they are operated, resulting in manual valves and non-manual valves. Manual valves control the opening and closing of valves through manual operation (such as a wheel, lever, or handle). In addition to normal maintenance work, such valves also involve manual operation during normal operation, so the operability of manual valves needs to be considered. Non-manual valves control the opening and closing of valves through electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, or other automated means. Such equipment is remotely operated in the main control room or other places during normal operation, and does not require manual operation on site. It mainly involves valve maintenance work, so the main focus is on the maintenance requirements of valves.
[0036] Panel cabinets, also known as distribution cabinets, control cabinets or switch cabinets, are closed metal boxes used to install, protect and maintain electrical equipment and components. They are usually used in power distribution systems, control systems and automation systems. For panel cabinets, secondary classification is not required.
[0037] In this embodiment, the preset equipment types and preset equipment features are preset classification rules, which are set in advance. The above-mentioned preliminary classification (instruments, valves, panels and cabinets) and secondary classification are only for illustration. The actual classification is much more complicated, and more detailed classifications can be performed as needed. When specifying the classification rules, it should be noted that the classification should be combined with the ergonomic requirements of the equipment. The original intention of classification is to put the equipment with the same ergonomic requirements in the same group so that the ergonomic compliance check can be automatically performed with the same tool later.
[0038] Step S300, according to the category of each device and the preset human factors engineering criteria library, obtain the human factors engineering requirements of each device. The human factors engineering criteria library is usually preset based on the theory and practice of human factors engineering, as well as the standards and specifications of a specific industry. These criteria libraries contain a series of design principles and standards for guiding the design of products, equipment or environments to ensure that they can adapt to the body size, ability, behavior and psychological characteristics of human users. In this step, the human factors engineering criteria library is the mapping relationship between the category of the device and the human factors engineering requirements. With this mapping relationship, the corresponding human factors engineering requirements can be obtained according to the category of the device.
[0039] In the plan for human factors compliance inspection of nuclear power plant equipment layout, the preset human factors engineering criteria library may include the following aspects: (1) Human size and ability: Consider the operator's body size, strength, flexibility, etc. to ensure that the location, height and operation method of the equipment are suitable for most operators; (2) Vision and perception: Ensure that the display instruments, indicator lights and control buttons on the equipment are easy to identify and read, while considering factors such as light, color and contrast; (3) Operation and control: The operation method of the equipment should be intuitive and easy to understand, and the location of control buttons and switches should be convenient for operation to reduce the possibility of operating errors; (4) Repair and maintenance: Ensure that there is sufficient space and conditions for operation when the equipment needs repair or maintenance, reducing repair time and cost; (5) Safety and health: The design should take into account the safety of the operator to avoid accidents or occupational diseases caused by improper design; (6) Environmental factors: Consider the special environmental conditions of the nuclear power plant, such as radiation, temperature, humidity, etc., and ensure that the equipment layout meets these environmental requirements.
[0040] In actual applications, human factors engineering criteria libraries may be customized and adjusted according to different application scenarios and requirements to ensure that they can meet the specific requirements of a specific project or environment. In the human factors compliance inspection platform for nuclear power plant equipment layout, these criteria libraries will be used to guide the operation of automatic inspection tools to ensure the human factors compliance of equipment layout.
[0041] Each type of equipment corresponds to multiple ergonomic requirements. If an automatic inspection tool is configured for each ergonomic requirement of each type of equipment, then a lot of automatic inspection tools need to be set up. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, step S300 includes: according to the category of each equipment and the preset ergonomic criteria library, obtaining the general ergonomic requirements and special ergonomic requirements of each equipment. The reason why ergonomic requirements are divided into general ergonomic requirements and special ergonomic requirements is to refine the similarities and differences of the ergonomic requirements of each equipment, thereby reducing the setting of automatic inspection tools in subsequent steps.
[0042] In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the general ergonomic requirements include maintenance space requirements, installation height requirements, passage requirements, and accessibility requirements.
[0043] Maintenance space requirements refer to the space required by maintenance personnel when performing equipment maintenance, inspection or replacing parts when they are designed and arranged. These requirements ensure that maintenance personnel can access key parts of the equipment safely and efficiently while reducing maintenance time and costs.
[0044] Installation height requirements refer to the height of the equipment installation location, which is regulated by taking into account the operator's body size and operating convenience when designing and arranging the equipment. These requirements ensure that the equipment is easy to operate, maintain and inspect, while reducing the risk of injury to operators due to improper posture (such as excessive bending or reaching).
[0045] Access requirements focus primarily on ensuring that there is adequate space and passageways so that personnel can move safely and efficiently between equipment or between equipment and work areas. This includes ensuring that the width, height and layout of the passageways can accommodate the movement of personnel and equipment.
[0046] Accessibility requirements focus on ensuring that the location, height, and layout of equipment, control panels, instruments, and other operating elements can be operated and accessed by people of varying sizes and abilities.
[0047] For the above five types of equipment (local display instruments, remote transmission instruments, panel cabinets, manual valves, and non-manual valves), their ergonomic requirements include maintenance space requirements, installation height requirements, channel requirements, and accessibility requirements. Therefore, these ergonomic requirements are classified as general ergonomic requirements.
[0048] In a specific embodiment of the present invention, special ergonomic requirements include visibility requirements or equipment component accessibility requirements. Special ergonomic requirements are unique to certain types of equipment. For the above-mentioned on-site display instrument, since the instrument readings need to be read on-site, the ergonomic requirements for the on-site display instrument also include visibility requirements (i.e., instrument display orientation); for the above-mentioned manual valve, since the valve stem needs to be operated on-site, the ergonomic requirements for the manual valve also include equipment component accessibility requirements (i.e., valve stem accessibility requirements).
[0049] Step S400: Perform a human factors compliance check on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance check tool library to obtain the inspection results. The human factors compliance check tool library refers to a collection of a series of tools and resources that are used to evaluate and verify whether the working environment, equipment, system or product design meets the requirements of human factors engineering. In this step, the preset human factors compliance check tool library not only stores these tools and resources, but also stores the human factors engineering requirements and their corresponding mapping relationships. In this way, when the human factors engineering requirements of each device are obtained according to step S300, an automatic inspection can be performed according to the preset human factors compliance check tool library to obtain the inspection results.
[0050] See also Figure 3 In a specific embodiment of the present invention, according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the human factors compliance inspection of each device is performed, including: S411, according to the maintenance space requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the maintenance space virtual body of each device is obtained; S412, the maintenance space virtual body of each device is loaded into the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and the maintenance space virtual body is checked for collision with the surrounding devices. If there is a collision, it means that the inspection of the maintenance space requirements of the device is not in compliance; if there is no collision, it means that the inspection of the maintenance space requirements of the device is in compliance.
[0051] The maintenance space virtual body is a concept used in computer-aided design and human factors engineering assessment. It is used to simulate the space required by maintenance personnel when performing equipment maintenance, inspection or replacing parts. This virtual body is usually created based on anthropometric data to ensure that the design meets the operational needs of most maintenance personnel. It is a virtual three-dimensional human model that represents the spatial range required by maintenance personnel when performing tasks. This model includes factors such as human size, limb motion range and operating posture.
[0052] The virtual body of the maintenance space is usually constructed through the following methods: (1) 3D modeling software: Use CAD software to create a virtual human model and simulate maintenance tasks; (2) Anthropometric data: Define the parameters of the virtual body based on anthropometric data, such as human size distribution, limb motion range, etc.; (3) Motion capture technology: Use motion capture technology to record the movements of actual maintenance personnel to obtain more accurate data; (4) Virtual reality: Simulate maintenance tasks in a virtual reality environment to evaluate and optimize the maintenance space. For each type of equipment, a corresponding virtual body of the maintenance space should be preset.
[0053] See also Figure 4 In a specific embodiment of the present invention, according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the human factors compliance inspection of each device is performed, including: S421, according to the channel requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the human channel virtual body of each device is obtained; S422, the human channel virtual body of each device is loaded into the door of the room where the device is located in the three-dimensional model, and the path of the human channel virtual body from the door to the device is simulated, and whether there is a collision between the human channel virtual body and the surrounding equipment during the walking process. If there is a collision, it means that the channel requirement inspection of the device is not in compliance; if there is no collision, it means that the channel requirement inspection of the device is in compliance.
[0054] The human channel virtual body can be, for example, the "95th percentile male virtual body", which is a concept used in human factors engineering and industrial design, which creates a virtual human model based on anthropometric data. This model represents that in a specific population, 95% of the individuals have a body width (usually the width between the two shoulder peaks) that is less than or equal to the width of this virtual body. In other words, the width of this virtual body is a statistically defined value that ensures that at least 95% of the population can pass through or operate within the design space.
[0055] See also Figure 5 In a specific embodiment of the present invention, according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a human factors compliance inspection of each device is performed, including: S431, according to the accessibility requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the virtual body of the personnel reachable domain of each device is obtained; S432, the virtual body of the personnel reachable domain of each device is loaded into the personnel reserved space of the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and the device is checked whether it is in the reachable domain. If the device is in the reachable domain, it means that the check of the accessibility requirements of the device is in compliance; if the device is not in the reachable domain, it means that the check of the accessibility requirements of the device is not in compliance.
[0056] The virtual body of the reachable area of personnel is a concept used in human factors engineering and industrial design to evaluate and design workspaces to ensure that operators can reach and operate equipment or control panels comfortably and safely. This virtual body is based on anthropometric data and simulates the spatial range that personnel can reach in a specific posture. It is a virtual three-dimensional human model that represents the spatial range that personnel arms, hands and tools can reach in a specific posture (such as standing, sitting, squatting, etc.). This model includes factors such as human size, limb motion range and operating posture.
[0057] See also Figure 6 In a specific embodiment of the present invention, according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the human factors compliance inspection of each device is performed, including: S441, according to the visibility requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, the personnel visual field virtual body of each device is obtained; S442, the personnel visual field virtual body of each device is loaded into the personnel reserved space of the location of the device in the three-dimensional model, and the device that needs to be read is checked whether it is in the visual field. If the device is in the visual field, it means that the inspection of the visibility requirements of the device is in compliance; if the device is not in the visual field, it means that the inspection of the visibility requirements of the device is not in compliance.
[0058] The virtual body of the human visual field is a concept used in human factors engineering and industrial design to evaluate and design the work environment to ensure that operators can clearly see the equipment, instruments or control panels they need to monitor or operate. This virtual body simulates the spatial range that a person can see in a specific posture based on human visual characteristics and anthropometry data. It is also a virtual three-dimensional human model that represents the spatial range that a person's eyes can observe in a specific posture (such as standing, sitting, etc.). This model includes factors such as a person's field of view, perspective and line of sight.
[0059] By constructing the above virtual bodies, automatic inspection of different ergonomic requirements can be achieved. For some other requirements, such as installation height requirements, there is no need to construct a virtual body. Instead, the height data of the equipment can be directly compared with some height data related to the human body to obtain the automatic inspection results of the installation height requirements. The above only lists some common automatic inspection processes for ergonomic requirements. For some other ergonomic requirements, the inspection process can be preset according to the actual situation.
[0060] After obtaining the inspection results, the inspection results can be displayed and exported, and iterative inspection can be performed after the non-conformities are rectified. By classifying the equipment in the 3D model and calling different inspection tools based on the equipment classification for automatic inspection, the inspection results and the non-conformity list can be automatically exported with one click after the inspection is completed. Improvement plans can be formulated for the non-conformity list, or it can be clarified that no modification is required. For the improved plan, iterative inspection can be performed again only for the improved part to obtain new inspection results.
[0061] It should be noted that the steps of the above methods are divided only for the purpose of clear description. When implementing, they can be combined into one step or some steps can be split and decomposed into multiple steps. As long as they contain the same logical relationship, they are all within the protection scope of this patent; adding insignificant modifications or introducing insignificant designs to the algorithm or process, but not changing the core design of the algorithm and process are all within the protection scope of this patent. Figure 7 The diagram shows a complete inspection flow chart in a real scenario.
[0062] See also Figure 8 , Figure 8 A nuclear power plant equipment layout human factors compliance inspection device provided for one embodiment of the present invention comprises a data acquisition unit 101, a classification unit 102, a requirement acquisition unit 103 and an inspection unit 104; wherein the data acquisition unit 101 is used to obtain the attribute information of each device in the nuclear power plant according to the three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant; the classification unit 102 is used to obtain the category of each device according to the attribute information of each device and a preset classification rule; the requirement acquisition unit 103 is used to obtain the human factors engineering requirements of each device according to the category of each device and a preset human factors engineering criterion library; the inspection unit 104 is used to perform human factors compliance inspection on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library to obtain an inspection result.
[0063] It should be noted that the human factors compliance checking device of this embodiment is a device corresponding to the human factors compliance checking method described above, and the functional modules in the human factors compliance checking device may correspond to the corresponding steps in the human factors compliance checking method. The human factors compliance checking device of this embodiment can be implemented in conjunction with the human factors compliance checking method, that is, in the absence of conflict, the relevant technical details mentioned in the human factors compliance checking method of the above embodiment can also be applied to the human factors compliance checking device of this embodiment.
[0064] In general, the human factor compliance inspection method and device of the present invention, on the one hand, greatly improves the efficiency of inspection, reduces the time and manpower consumed in inspection work, and improves the timeliness and completeness of inspection by arranging automatic human factor compliance inspection through equipment. On the other hand, automatic inspection adopts objective judgment criteria, which improves the reliability of human factor compliance inspection.
[0065] The above embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and effects of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention. Anyone familiar with the art may modify or alter the above embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, all equivalent modifications or alterations made by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and technical concept disclosed by the present invention shall still be covered by the claims of the present invention.
Claims
1. A method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout, characterized in that: include: According to the three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant, attribute information of each device in the nuclear power plant is obtained; Obtaining a category of each of the devices according to the attribute information of each of the devices and a preset classification rule; According to the category of each of the devices and a preset human factors engineering criteria library, obtaining human factors engineering requirements for each of the devices; According to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a human factors compliance inspection is performed on each device to obtain an inspection result.
2. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 1, characterized in that: According to the attribute information of each device and the preset classification rules, the category of each device is obtained, including: Preliminarily classifying each of the devices according to the attribute information of each of the devices and the preset device type; Each of the devices is secondary classified according to the attribute information of each of the devices and the preset device characteristics.
3. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 1, characterized in that: According to the category of each of the equipment and the preset human factors engineering criteria library, the human factors engineering requirements of each of the equipment are obtained, including: According to the category of each of the devices and a preset ergonomics criteria library, the general ergonomics requirements and special ergonomics requirements of each of the devices are obtained.
4. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The general ergonomic requirements include maintenance space requirements, installation height requirements, passage requirements, and accessibility requirements.
5. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The special ergonomic requirements include visibility requirements or equipment component accessibility requirements.
6. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 4, characterized in that: According to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, perform human factors compliance inspection on each device, including: According to the maintenance space requirements of each of the equipment and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a maintenance space virtual body of each of the equipment is obtained; The maintenance space virtual body of each of the equipment is loaded into the location of the equipment in the three-dimensional model, and it is checked whether there is a collision between the maintenance space virtual body and surrounding equipment.
7. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 4, characterized in that: According to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, perform human factors compliance inspection on each device, including: According to the channel requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a human channel virtual body of each device is obtained; The human channel virtual body of each device is loaded into the doorway of the room where the device is located in the three-dimensional model, and the path of the human channel virtual body walking from the doorway to the device is simulated to detect whether there is a collision with surrounding devices during the walking process.
8. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 4, characterized in that: According to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, perform human factors compliance inspection on each device, including: According to the accessibility requirements of each of the devices and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a human reachable domain virtual body of each of the devices is obtained; The personnel accessible domain virtual body of each device is loaded into the personnel reserved space at the location of the device in the three-dimensional model to check whether the device is within the accessible domain.
9. The method for checking the human factors compliance of nuclear power plant equipment layout according to claim 5, characterized in that: According to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and the preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, perform human factors compliance inspection on each device, including: According to the visibility requirements of each of the devices and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library, a human visual field virtual body of each of the devices is obtained; The personnel visual field virtual body of each device is loaded into the personnel reserved space at the location of the device in the three-dimensional model to check whether the device to be read is within the visual field.
10. A nuclear power plant equipment layout human factors compliance inspection device, characterized in that: include: A data acquisition unit, used to obtain attribute information of each device in the nuclear power plant according to the three-dimensional model of the nuclear power plant; A classification unit, used to obtain a category of each of the devices according to the attribute information of each of the devices and a preset classification rule; A requirement acquisition unit, used for obtaining the human factors engineering requirement of each of the devices according to the category of each of the devices and a preset human factors engineering criterion library; The inspection unit is used to perform a human factors compliance inspection on each device according to the human factors engineering requirements of each device and a preset human factors compliance inspection tool library to obtain an inspection result.