Routing method and routing device of wireless sensor network based on transmission direction

Abstract

The invention discloses a routing method and a routing device of a wireless sensor network based on the transmission direction. The method comprises the steps of determining a direction included angle of a forwarding candidate set, determining the forwarding candidate set, selecting a forwarding node and forwarding information, and determining a cornered ribbon network forwarding candidate set. The algorithm takes a problem of directivity into consideration when the forwarding candidate set is selected, thereby reducing the receiving energy consumption to a great extent compared with a traditional opportunistic routing algorithm which adopts blind omni-directional broadcasting; and the algorithm reduces the transmission delay, is high in real-time performance and low in communication cost, and solves problems that traditional geographic position routing is easy to select a wrong direction in a complex area and that the energy is imbalance.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of wireless networks, in particular to a routing method for a wireless sensor network based on transmission direction, which is applicable to wireless sensor networks for monitoring large-scale banded areas such as the Great Wall. Background technique [0002] Data collection is the primary task in environmental monitoring applications. Sensing nodes need to reliably transmit the collected information to the destination node, which affects the node quality, network life cycle, transmission delay, communication cost, transmission success rate, etc. aspect request. Since routing policies have a crucial impact on these properties, an efficient routing mechanism is a key issue. [0003] The Great Wall, which has a history of more than 2,000 years, is facing the situation of disappearing. It is urgent to protect the Great Wall. The Great Wall belongs to linear cultural heritage. Linear cultural heritage is a n...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] The second type: routing based on geographical location; the defects of this routing method are: 1) The strategy of selecting the next hop node only by comparing the Euclidean distance between each neighbor node and the destination node, in some more complex does not apply in the region

For example, in the strip area with many corners, such as Figure 4 As shown, due to the blind selection of nodes closer to the destination node, this method cannot effectively reduce the number of hops, but it is easy to cause errors in the selection of the propagation direction, and eventually lead to packet loss

2) Each node only selects an optimal next-hop node, which can easily lead to packet loss

reduced reliability

3) When a node selects a forwarding node, all its neighbor nodes need to coordinate and select an optimal (that is, the closest to the destination node) node as the forwarding node through a large number of data packet exchanges, which increases the communication overhead

[0008] Same as traditional opportunistic routing and routing algorithms based on geographic location, this method has the following disadvantages: 1) The strategy of selecting the next hop node only by comparing the Euclidean distance between each neighbor node and the destination node, in some more complex does not apply in the region of

For example, in the strip area with many corners, such as image 3 As shown, due to the blind selection of nodes closer to the destination node, this method cannot effectively reduce the number of hops, but it is easy to cause errors in the selection of the propagation direction, and eventually lead to packet loss

2) When a node selects a forwarding node, all its neighbor nodes need to coordinate and select an optimal (that is, the closest to the destination node) node as a forwarding node through a large number of data packet exchanges, which increases the communication overhead

Images