Product review system including reviewer purchase indicator

a product review and indicator technology, applied in the field of digital processing systems, can solve the problems of not being able to accurately represent consumer-provided criteria, expert-based qualitative criteria may not be as accurate as consumer-provided criteria, and consumers might not be able to easily interpret specification-based criteria properly

Inactive Publication Date: 2008-10-02
POWERREVIEWS
View PDF34 Cites 42 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

While specification based information can be useful to consumers it may also present drawbacks since some consumers might not be able to easily interpret the specification-based criteria properly.
Also, expert-based qualitative criteria may not be as accurate as consumer-provided criteria since it is largely or exclusively dependent upon one or a few people and the decision to define the criteria is made at a past point in time.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Product review system including reviewer purchase indicator
  • Product review system including reviewer purchase indicator
  • Product review system including reviewer purchase indicator

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0010]A preferred embodiment of the invention displays user-created keywords that are used in item reviews to describe or rate an item. The keywords are rated by user voting. The keywords, along with the associated ratings, are displayed for further use by users in creating other reviews of the product. The keywords and ratings are also used in a display of reviews of the product. The keywords and ratings can be categorized according to the type of attributes (e.g., “pro,”“con,” etc.) in which the keywords are used.

[0011]In one embodiment, each keyword is associated with a rating that is referred to as a “use value.” The use value indicates the number of times that the keyword was used in a review. The use in a review represents a “vote” by a user. In other words, every time a user selects a keyword as appropriate to describe the product, the use value increases. In this manner the consumer gets an idea about the popularity of the keyword in reviewing a product or products. This can...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

A system for presenting keywords obtained from users in a review process. The keywords are displayed along with a use value that reflects the number of times users have voted or selected the keyword as being relevant or effective in a review of a product. The keywords can be used to assist consumers in deciding whether to purchase a product or a service, in determining a brand's reputation, or for other purposes. Keywords can be ranked according to usage criteria such as the frequency of use of the keyword in reviews, the reputation of a user / reviewer who created or used the keyword, etc. Rankings can be dynamically updated when keyword usage changes. Such as when a keyword declines in popularity, when words change in meaning or become obsolete or irrelevant with respect to their original intent, etc. Keywords can be used as filters for product searches.

Description

CLAIM OF PRIORITY AND REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001]This application claims priority from the following, each of which is incorporated by reference as if set forth in full in this application:[0002]U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60 / 736,969 filed on Nov. 15, 2005 entitled “PRODUCT COMPARISON CHART BASED ON A QUALITATIVE CONSUMER VOCABULARY, A METHOD FOR COMPARING TWO OR MORE PRODUCTS BASED ON CRITERIA FROM CONSUMER-CONTRIBUTED WORDS AND / OR PHRASES”; and[0003]U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60 / 741,413 filed on Dec. 1, 2005 entitled “DYNAMIC PRODUCT SUMMARY BASED ON CONSUMER-CONTRIBUTED KEYWORDS”.[0004]This application is related to co-pending U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. ______ [TBDI filed on Jun. 22, 2006 entitled “SYSTEM FOR OBTAINING REVIEWS USING SELECTIONS CREATED BY USER BASE” which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full in this application for all purposes.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0005]This invention relates in g...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06F3/048
CPCG06F17/30719G06Q30/02G06Q30/0203G06F16/345Y10S707/99933Y10S707/99943Y10S707/99934Y10S707/99935Y10S707/99945
Inventor CHEA, ROBERT S.MORRIS, JAMESPRABHU, GAUTAM
Owner POWERREVIEWS
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products