Assessing and voting system

Abstract

The invention especially relates to an assessing and voting system, belonging to the technical field of voting APP software. According to the assessing and voting system, a hand-held terminal carries out voting and sends a voting result within an assigned period; a statistics module carries out statistic analysis on the voting result; and a determination module determines whether a preset standard is reached. The assessing and voting system is fast and convenient in voting and can rapidly carry out statistic analysis on voting results, fairness and impartiality of voting are prevented from influence of dishonest conduction of related people, the credibility of related assessment is improved, and the degree of fairness and impartiality of the voting results is increased.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of voting software APP, and in particular relates to a rating and voting system. Background technique [0002] In terms of job title evaluation, civil servant interview, public institution interview, etc., it is necessary to vote on the application by the expert review committee based on the professional background, relevant work experience, application interview situation, interview results and pre-evaluated content of the applicant. The interviewers can achieve the job titles they applied for, or sort through the interview results to define the admission list. [0003] Due to the large number of relevant personnel involved, the professional background of the relevant personnel is complex, and the relevant work experience may vary. When it comes to the assessment site, interview site, etc., due to the large number of personnel that need to be arranged, problems are likely to occur and lead to confusion. ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] Due to the large number of relevant personnel involved, the professional background of the relevant personnel is complex, and the relevant work experience may vary. When it comes to the assessment site, interview site, etc., due to the large number of personnel that need to be arranged, problems are likely to occur and lead to confusion.

[0004] In the existing links such as job title evaluation, civil servant interviews, and public institution interviews, there may be a time gap between expert voting and statistical results, which provides the possibility for relevant personnel to follow special procedures that greatly affect the evaluation results, resulting in related The fairness and impartiality of the evaluation results are greatly reduced, and the credibility is reduced; in addition, the relevant expert review committees are usually busy with work and it is difficult to have time to go to the site for evaluation work at the same time