Auxiliary intelligent reviewing system for power transmission and transformation project design

Abstract

The invention relates to an auxiliary intelligent reviewing system for power transmission and transformation project design. The auxiliary intelligent reviewing system comprises the following realization steps of: project key feature index system library building; design information collection and checking; key feature index intelligent comparison and evaluation; and statistical analysis. The auxiliary intelligent reviewing system has the advantages that the centralized management on the design reviewing of projects at 110kV or below 110kV, and the reviewing efficiency is improved; a complete data management platform can be built for filing and reviewing service information and data in a unified way; the project design quality informatization evaluation can be performed, and a design credit performance tracking system can be completed; and a project techno-economic indicator system can be built, unified reviewing measurement standards can be provided, and the intelligent reviewing of the project design can be assisted.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to an intelligent review auxiliary system for power transmission and transformation engineering design, which belongs to the field of power systems. Background technique [0002] At present, in the process of power grid project design review, there are difficulties such as incomplete reporting materials, lack of unified judgment standards for review, and difficulty in archiving data. The main difficulties are reflected in the following points: [0003] (1) Design review lacks a unified judgment standard [0004] In the review process, experts generally evaluate according to the review management requirements and their own experience, but there is a lack of a unified and reasonable review measurement standard for various projects, and the review depth and requirements of each expert are not the same; this affects the standardization of design review work and hinders design. Guide and standardize the development of work. [0005] ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] In the review process, experts generally evaluate according to the review management requirements and their own experience, but there is a lack of a unified and reasonable review measurement standard for various projects, and the review depth and requirements of each expert are not the same; this affects the standardization of design review work and hinders design. Guiding and standardizing the development of work

[0005] (2) Lack of effective management of engineering design and review materials

[0006] There are scattered materials, diverse formats, and lack of unified archiving in the review materials such as the review version, final version, and finalized version design materials, review minutes, and review opinions in the project feasibility study and preliminary design stages, resulting in a large amount of time spent on data collection, statistics, and search. Time and energy, to a certain extent, restrict the company's refined management of project review business

[0007] (3) Design data reporting lacks standardization

[0008] Due to the differences in the professional level of each design institute, there are problems such as different design depths and incomplete application materials. The lack of standardization of design materials increases the workload of project pre-evaluation. The low rate of data preparation and repeated submission of materials will affect the evaluation. Scheduling and Review Efficiency

[0009] (4) It is difficult to coordinate the arrangement of the review conference

[0010] In actual work, according to the design data preparation rate, project construction progress requirements and other reasons, the implementation of the review plan and the review meeting arrangement need to be flexibly adjusted to adapt to the actual situation, but the current review management method is not convenient for coordination and scheduling between the project owner unit, the design unit, and review experts Formal review meeting arrangement, difficult to concentrate personnel

[0011] (5) Design quality lacks measurement and statistics

[0012] At present, the design quality in the province lacks a unified record and evaluation management system, which makes it difficult for the owner and the evaluation unit to fully understand the professional level of the design institute and the engineering design undertaking situation