Method and system for compiling, correcting and auditing three-dimensional model for three-dimensional factory

Abstract

The invention discloses a compiling, checking and reviewing method and system for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. The method comprises the steps that a three-dimensional factory design cooperative working platform conducts checking before checking and reviewing on the three-dimensional model and generates a checking report; in response to an operation instruction of a compiling and checking person, the platform submits a model checking requirement and a connection relationship between an item bottom layer and a database in the three-dimensional model to the checking person for checking, and meanwhile, the model checking requirement and the connection relationship can be returned to the modeling person for modification, and operation is repeated until checking is passed; and finally, the platform locks the checked, edited and revised three-dimensional model and stores the three-dimensional model in a platform database. According to the method, the workload of modeling personnel can be reduced, the quality of the three-dimensional model can be controlled through a platform tool, the quality of the model can be controlled step by step in detail, meanwhile, the three-dimensional model is locked all the time in the verification process, the three-dimensional model can be modified only at the modeling personnel, and the verification efficiency is improved. And the consistency of the three-dimensional model and the drawing is further ensured.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of three-dimensional factory collaborative design, and in particular to a method and system for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. Background Art

[0002] The existing factory 3D design software has relatively simple functions, and the editing and proofreading of factory 3D design models has always been a formality. Before the 3D factory design collaborative work platform was established, there was no editing and proofreading link for the 3D model. After the model was built, the drawings were only edited and proofread in the stage of producing the construction drawings. Because it is not possible to edit and proofread directly on the model, but to print out the two-dimensional paper drawings, and to edit and proofread the paper drawings to realize the editing and proofreading of the model, some problems are directly modified manually in CAD, and some models are changed, while others are not. It is impossible to determine whether the model quality is consistent with the drawings. Therefore, in actual design, it is easy to have a double-skin phenomenon when using this method, and the drawings and models do not match. The quality of the 3D model is related to the quality of the design, the accuracy of the drawing, on-site construction, the subsequent completion model, the handover to the owner, and the subsequent operation and maintenance.

[0003] The existing patent CN117196545A discloses a design compliance review method and system based on three-dimensional verification, which is used to solve the problem that it is difficult for reviewers to grasp all the mandatory regulations that are numerous and prone to contradictions in a timely manner, thereby affecting the efficiency and quality of the review. The method includes: obtaining model data in the design model data package; parsing the model data into three-dimensional models of various categories, and retaining the structural relationship of these three-dimensional models; processing various mandatory specifications into structured rules through a natural language parsing algorithm, and loading and applying these rules; using the loaded and applied structured rules related to the mandatory specifications to verify the model to generate verification results, and view them by category. The method and system focus on the review of three-dimensional verification design compliance, and do not solve the problem in the prior art that the three-dimensional model has no editing and review link or cannot be edited and reviewed directly on the model, and cannot ensure that the quality of the three-dimensional model is consistent with the drawing.

[0004] The existing patent CN118427923A discloses an automatic review and duplicate checking system based on the BIM three-dimensional model resource library. The present invention utilizes the uniqueness of the BIM three-dimensional model element ID and performs duplicate checking and auditing through automated technology, aiming to overcome the shortcomings of existing solutions. Each BIM three-dimensional model is composed of multiple elements. The IDs of these elements are automatically assigned by software such as Revit when they are created and cannot be changed. Based on the uniqueness of the element ID, this solution effectively identifies duplicate or similar models by automatically comparing the element ID of the newly uploaded model with the element ID of the existing model in the resource library. This system focuses on the automatic review and duplicate checking of the three-dimensional model resource library, and does not solve the problem in the prior art that the three-dimensional model has no editing and proofreading link or cannot be edited and proofread directly on the model, and cannot ensure that the quality of the three-dimensional model is consistent with the drawing.

[0005] In summary, the above two existing patents do not solve the problem that the three-dimensional model has no editing and proofreading process or cannot be edited and proofread directly on the model, and thus cannot ensure whether the quality of the three-dimensional model is consistent with the drawing. Summary of the invention

[0006] Based on the above technical problems, the purpose of the present invention is to propose a method and system for editing and proofreading three-dimensional models of three-dimensional factories, so as to solve the problem that the three-dimensional models in the prior art have no editing and proofreading process or cannot be edited and proofread directly on the models, and cannot ensure whether the quality of the three-dimensional models is consistent with the drawings.

[0007] To achieve the above purpose, the present invention proposes a method and system for editing and proofreading a 3D model of a 3D factory, which can ensure the accuracy of the entire 3D model, meet the quality assurance requirements, and truly ensure that the model can be used directly and without worry. The specific technical solution is as follows:

[0008] A method for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, the method is implemented based on a three-dimensional factory design collaborative work platform, and the method includes the following steps:

[0009] S1. The platform performs a pre-verification check on the 3D model of the 3D factory;

[0010] S2. Edit and review the 3D model using the editing and review tools in the platform;

[0011] S3, the platform locks the 3D model and assigns it status and version parameters;

[0012] The pre-verification check includes two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification, consistency check, rule check and / or collision check.

[0013] Furthermore, the two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification is to compare the topological structure of the process system P&ID diagram with the logical order of the three-dimensional model; the consistency verification is to check the modeling standardization issues of the model to determine whether it meets the requirements of the software; the rule verification is to check the models of various disciplines to determine whether they meet the standards and specifications of the profession; the collision check is to check all items to determine whether the model has any collision.

[0014] Furthermore, the step S1 also includes: forming a corresponding inspection report after the pre-review inspection and storing it in the platform database in association with the three-dimensional model.

[0015] Furthermore, the step S2 specifically includes:

[0016] S21. In response to the instruction of the modeler, the platform submits the inspection report and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the item of the three-dimensional model and the database to the checker for checking;

[0017] S22. In response to the instruction of the checker, the platform returns the problem to the modeler for modification after the checker marks the problem;

[0018] S23. In response to the auditor's instruction, the platform returns the information to the proofreader for review or to the modeler for modification after the auditor marks the problem.

[0019] Furthermore, the annotation is to draw cloud lines or circles in the three-dimensional model, and the cloud lines and circles always appear around the three-dimensional model showing the problem part.

[0020] Furthermore, in step S2, the platform locks the three-dimensional model that leaves the modeler and unlocks the three-dimensional model that is returned to the modeler. Only after unlocking can the modeler modify the three-dimensional model within the modification authority.

[0021] The present invention also proposes an editing and proofreading system for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, which is used to implement the above-mentioned editing and proofreading method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. The system includes a pre-proofreading inspection module, an editing and proofreading module connected to the output end of the pre-proofreading inspection module, and a model locking module connected to the output end of the editing and proofreading module, and also includes a platform database connected to the pre-proofreading inspection module, the editing and proofreading module and the model locking module;

[0022] The pre-review inspection module is used to perform a pre-review inspection on the three-dimensional model and generate a corresponding inspection report, which is associated with the three-dimensional model and stored in the platform database;

[0023] The editing and reviewing module is used to respond to the operating instructions of the editing and reviewing personnel and submit the model review requirements and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the three-dimensional model and the database to the reviewer for review, and return it to the modeler for modification until the verification is passed. The editing and reviewing module is used to respond to the operating instructions of the editing and reviewing personnel and submit the three-dimensional model and the model review requirements to the reviewer for review and return the model to the modeler for modification until the verification is passed. At the same time, the review records and modification records are also stored in the platform database;

[0024] The model locking module is used to lock the three-dimensional model that has been edited and reviewed, and assign its status and version parameters as marks, which are stored in the platform database.

[0025] Furthermore, the pre-verification inspection module includes a two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification tool, a consistency check tool, a rule verification tool and / or a collision check tool.

[0026] Furthermore, the editing and proofreading module completely analyzes and structures the underlying model data of the 3D design software, adds attribute information to the model data, and stores it in the platform database after planning and processing;

[0027] The incrementally modified data in the editing and reviewing module is divided into three types: Add, Modified, and Delete. Different versions of the data can be traced back to the specified submission record through patch.

[0028] Based on the above technical solution, the present invention proposes a method and system for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, which has at least the following beneficial effects:

[0029] 1. The present invention proposes a method and system for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. The platform first performs a pre-proofreading check on the three-dimensional model and uses tools to control the quality of the three-dimensional model, which can reduce the workload of designers.

[0030] 2. The present invention proposes a method and system for editing and proofreading three-dimensional models of three-dimensional factories. After checking before proofreading to ensure that there are no problems, the proofreader can use the model editing and proofreading tools of the platform to directly edit and proofread in the three-dimensional model. The work is completed only after the proofreading is passed. The quality of the three-dimensional model is controlled in detail step by step to ensure the quality of the model.

[0031] 3. The present invention proposes a method and system for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. During the proofreading process, the three-dimensional model is always locked. The model can only be modified when it is returned to the modeler. This ensures the consistency of the model and the drawings, avoiding subsequent repeated verification of the drawings and models.

[0032] 4. The present invention proposes a method and system for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, which stores the inspection report before the proofreading and the modified data during the editing and proofreading process in the platform database, thus facilitating the modeling personnel to query the historical data. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] The accompanying drawings in the specification, which constitute a part of the present invention, are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention. The exemplary embodiments of the present invention and their descriptions are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute improper limitations on the present invention.

[0034] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a method for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory proposed by the present invention;

[0035] Figure 2 The present invention is a schematic diagram of the structure of a system for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] It should be noted that, in the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present invention and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other. The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and in combination with the embodiments.

[0037] The present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with specific embodiments. These embodiments should not be construed as limiting the scope of protection claimed by the present invention.

[0038] Example 1

[0039] See also Figure 1 As shown, the present invention proposes a method for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. The method is implemented based on a three-dimensional factory design collaborative work platform and specifically includes the following steps:

[0040] S1. The platform performs pre-review inspection and modification on the 3D model of the 3D factory;

[0041] Specifically, after uploading the 3D model of the 3D factory to the 3D factory design collaborative work platform, the platform first performs a pre-review check on the 3D model. The pre-review check includes model 2D and 3D verification, model consistency verification, model rule verification and model collision check.

[0042] Among them, the two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification is to compare the topological structure of the upstream process system P&ID diagram with the logical order of the three-dimensional model. If the two are consistent, the requirements are met. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification can avoid the inconsistency between the three-dimensional model and the process; the model consistency verification is to check the modeling standardization issues of the model and determine whether the three-dimensional model meets the relevant requirements of the software; the model rule verification is to check the models of various professions according to the knowledge base established according to the professional standards to determine whether the three-dimensional model meets the standards and specifications of the profession; the model collision check is to check all items in a certain factory building, a certain floor or a certain area to determine whether there is a collision in the three-dimensional model, and to check the interference of the three-dimensional model, including soft interference and hard interference, to ensure that the three-dimensional model will not collide or fight.

[0043] After the above-mentioned pre-review inspections are completed, a corresponding inspection report will be generated and the associated 3D model will be stored in the platform's database.

[0044] S2. Editors and reviewers use the editing and review tools in the platform to edit and review the 3D model;

[0045] Specifically, after the pre-review check is completed, the 3D model is edited and reviewed using the editing and review tools in the platform.

[0046] In response to the modeler's operation instructions, the platform submits the 3D model review requirements, various inspection reports, and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the items in the related 3D model and the database to the reviewer. At the same time, the platform locks the review target model and the review target model of the 3D modeling software, so that the modeler cannot modify it temporarily. The reviewer first checks whether there are any problems with the report. After all the reports are correct, the 3D model is manually reviewed. If a problem is found, the platform editing and review tools are used to directly draw cloud lines or circles in the 3D model. The model with cloud lines or circles can be rotated at will, but the cloud lines or circles always appear around the model showing the problem part.

[0047] In response to the operating instructions of the reviewer, the platform stores the specific link relationship of the 3D model, the cloud line or circle information, and the problem annotation text in the database planned by the platform, and returns it to the modeler and unlocks the review target model and the review target model in the 3D software. The modeler can modify the 3D model within the authority. The modeler modifies the 3D model according to the requirements of the reviewer, and resubmits it to the reviewer through the platform after the modification is completed. The reviewer re-checks the 3D model. The reviewer checks the modification of the model based on the last opinion. If it is found that the problem has not been completely modified, it will be sent back to the modeler through the platform for re-modification. Repeat the above actions until all the problems are received and modified. After the verification is passed, the platform responds to the operation of the reviewer and submits the model verification requirements and the link relationship between the underlying items in the associated 3D model and the database to the auditor.

[0048] The auditor checks the opinions and implementation status of the proofreader and manually checks the 3D model again. If any problems are found, the platform editing and review tools are used to directly draw clouds or circles in the 3D model.

[0049] In response to the operating instructions of the reviewer, the platform stores the specific link relationship of the 3D model, the cloud line or circle information, and the problem annotation text in the database planned by the platform, and returns it to the reviewer for verification or directly returns it to the modeler for modification. If it is returned to the reviewer and the reviewer verifies that there is indeed a problem, it will be returned to the modeler through the platform for modification until all the problems are corrected and the editing and review is completed.

[0050] S3. After editing and proofreading, the platform locks the 3D model and assigns its status and version parameters.

[0051] Specifically, after editing and proofreading, the platform responds to the reviewer's operating instructions, locks the final 3D model, and assigns its status and version parameters.

[0052] The present embodiment proposes a method for editing and proofreading a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory. The three-dimensional model is first checked before proofreading, and then the model is edited and proofread if there are no problems. This can not only reduce the workload of designers, but also control the quality of the model in detail step by step to ensure the accuracy of the model quality.

[0053] Example 2

[0054] This embodiment proposes a system for editing and reviewing a 3D model of a 3D factory. The system is used to implement the editing and review method for a 3D model of a 3D factory proposed in the above embodiment 1. The system is set in a 3D factory design collaborative work platform. Figure 2 As shown, the system includes a pre-review check module, an editing and review module, a model locking module and a platform database. The output end of the pre-review check module is connected to the input end of the editing and review module, and the output end of the editing and review module is connected to the input end of the model locking module. The pre-review check module, the editing and review module and the model locking module are all connected to the platform database.

[0055] The pre-review inspection module includes two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification tools, consistency check tools, rule verification tools and collision check tools. The pre-review inspection module is used to perform pre-review inspection on the three-dimensional model and generate a corresponding inspection report, which is associated with the three-dimensional model and stored in the platform database.

[0056] The editing and review module is used to respond to the operating instructions of the editor and reviewer to submit the model review requirements and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the three-dimensional model item and the database to the reviewer for review and return the model to the modeler for modification until the review is passed. At the same time, the review record and modification record are also planned to be stored in the platform database; the modeler submits the link relationship between the bottom layer of the three-dimensional model item and the database to the reviewer, and the reviewer can obtain relevant data from the bottom layer of the database according to the link relationship. In this way, during the editing and review process, only the link relationship is transmitted without the model, which reduces the amount of data transmitted and the transmission speed is faster. At the same time, during the editing and review process, the model submitted for review can be compared with the latest model. It can be intuitively seen which parts have been changed and whether the changed model has interfered with the model being reviewed, and it can be highlighted. In the later quality assurance inspection, the model at that time can be directly called out according to the link.

[0057] Furthermore, the editing and proofreading module completely analyzes and structures the underlying model data of the factory 3D design software on the factory design collaborative work platform, and adds professional rules, modeling personnel information, modeling time, storage time, proofreading personnel information, review personnel information, version and status and other attribute information to the model data from the top to the bottom, which cannot be divided again, and stores it in the platform database after planning and processing; at the same time, for incrementally modified data, it can be distinguished by type, including three types of Add, Modified, and Delete, and can record all user operations according to timestamp, personnel, change information, submission log, submission hash and other information. Different versions of data can be traced back to the specified submission record through patch. At the same time, data can be labeled to record the status of the data. Starting from the conceptual design, the version number is increased as the design increases to achieve version management.

[0058] The model locking module is used to lock the 3D model that has been edited and reviewed, and assign its status and version parameters as a mark, which is stored in the platform database.

[0059] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

[0060] It should be noted that, in this article, relational terms such as first and second, etc. are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or any other variants thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or device. In the absence of further restrictions, the elements defined by the sentence "comprise a ..." do not exclude the existence of other identical elements in the process, method, article or device including the elements.

[0061] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as an ordered list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, which can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by an instruction execution system, apparatus or device (such as a computer-based system, a system including a processor or other system that can fetch instructions from an instruction execution system, apparatus or device and execute instructions), or used in combination with these instruction execution systems, apparatuses or devices.

[0062] It should be understood that each part of the present invention can be implemented by hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented by software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system.

[0063] It should be noted that, in the description of this specification, the description with reference to the terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "example", "specific example", or "some examples" etc. means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present invention. In this specification, the schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art may combine and combine the different embodiments or examples described in this specification and the features of the different embodiments or examples, unless they are contradictory.

Claims

1. A method for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, characterized in that: The method is implemented based on a three-dimensional factory design collaborative work platform, and the method includes the following steps: S1. The platform performs a pre-verification check on the 3D model of the 3D factory; S2. Edit and review the 3D model using the editing and review tools in the platform; S3, the platform locks the 3D model and assigns it status and version parameters; The pre-verification check includes two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification, consistency check, rule check and / or collision check.

2. The editing and reviewing method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The two- and three-dimensional verification is to compare the topological structure of the process system P&ID diagram with the logical order of the three-dimensional model; the consistency verification is to check the modeling standardization issues of the model to determine whether it meets the requirements of the software; the rule verification is to check the models of various disciplines to determine whether they meet the standards and specifications of the profession; the collision check is to check all items to determine whether the model has any collisions.

3. The editing and reviewing method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that: The step S1 also includes: forming a corresponding inspection report after the pre-review inspection and storing it in the platform database in association with the three-dimensional model.

4. The editing and reviewing method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step S2 specifically includes: S21. In response to the instruction of the modeler, the platform submits the inspection report and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the item of the three-dimensional model and the database to the checker for checking; S22. In response to the instruction of the checker, the platform returns the problem to the modeler for modification after the checker marks the problem; S23. In response to the auditor's instruction, the platform returns the information to the proofreader for review or to the modeler for modification after the auditor marks the problem.

5. The editing and reviewing method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 4, characterized in that: The annotation is to draw cloud lines or circles in the three-dimensional model, and the cloud lines and circles always appear around the three-dimensional model showing the problem part.

6. The editing and reviewing method for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step S2, the platform locks the three-dimensional model that has left the modeler and unlocks the three-dimensional model that has been returned to the modeler. Only after unlocking can the modeler modify the three-dimensional model within the modification authority.

7. A system for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory, used to implement the method for editing and reviewing a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that: It includes a pre-review check module, an editing and proofreading module connected to the output end of the pre-review check module, a model locking module connected to the output end of the editing and proofreading module, and a platform database connected to the pre-review check module, the editing and proofreading module and the model locking module; The pre-review inspection module is used to perform a pre-review inspection on the three-dimensional model and generate a corresponding inspection report, which is associated with the three-dimensional model and stored in the platform database; The editing and reviewing module is used to respond to the operation instructions of the editor and reviewer to submit the model review requirements and the link relationship between the bottom layer of the three-dimensional model and the database to the reviewer for review, and return it to the modeler for modification until the review is passed. At the same time, the review records and modification records are also stored in the platform database; The model locking module is used to lock the three-dimensional model that has been edited and reviewed, and assign its status and version parameters as marks, which are stored in the platform database.

8. The editing and reviewing system for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 7, characterized in that: The pre-verification inspection module includes a two-dimensional and three-dimensional verification tool, a consistency check tool, a rule verification tool and / or a collision check tool.

9. The editing and reviewing system for a three-dimensional model of a three-dimensional factory according to claim 7, characterized in that: The editing and review module completely analyzes and structures the underlying model data of the 3D design software, adds attribute information to the model data, and stores it in the platform database after planning and processing; The incrementally modified data in the editing and reviewing module is divided into three types: Add, Modified, and Delete. Different versions of the data can be traced back to the specified submission record through patch.

Images