Forum post evaluation method, device and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a forum post evaluation method, device and system. The method comprises the following steps of: a server obtains the contents of a post and the operation information of a corresponding user for the post so as to obtain post features; the post features are subjected to data distribution analysis, and feature transformation is carries out to obtain a feature vector; and a pre-established evaluation model is used for determining an evaluation score according to the feature vector and a weight vector, and the evaluation score is used for evaluating the post. By use of the forum post evaluation method, the post can be quickly evaluated.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of network information analysis and data mining, in particular to a forum post evaluation method, device and system. Background technique [0002] With the continuous development of computer networks, network information has become an important part of daily life, and the Internet has become an important place for people to obtain information and communicate. Users can publish information, obtain information, exchange experience, etc. in forums of various topics, and these massive posts contain huge potential value. [0003] In the prior art, the evaluation of posts in online forums is mainly based on the quality level classification after content identification, and the posts are usually divided into several grades such as good, medium, poor, and garbage. However, such evaluation methods have the following defects: 1. When When it is necessary to sort posts of the same level, it is often only randomly sort...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] In the prior art, the evaluation of posts in online forums is mainly based on the quality level classification after content identification, and the posts are usually divided into several grades such as good, medium, poor, and garbage. However, such evaluation methods have the following defects: 1. When When it is necessary to sort posts of the same level, it is often only randomly sorted, and it is difficult to distinguish the subtle quality differences of each post, and based on personalized recommendation, sorting and other needs, it is often necessary to accurately score each post; 2. Only consider Content factors, lack of user participation, are not suitable for the operation of community products; 3. Lack of consideration of time factors, unable to guarantee the timeliness of posts, often high-scoring posts are some outdated posts

Images