A kind of wasp attractant, using method and application thereof
A technology of attractant and wall bee, applied in the field of bee pollination
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0036] The controlled-release device is a low-density polyethylene zipper pouch with a wall thickness of 0.5mm and a size of 2.5*1cm. Each sachet contains 500mg of wasp attractant, these sachets are closed with a zipper and further heat sealed. Weighed weekly for 42 days, the release rates of individual components and combinations were measured at room temperature (18°C to 23°C).
[0037] Table 1 Release Rate mg / sachet / week
[0038]
[0039] The results showed that the system could simultaneously release 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol and methyl salicylate. Those skilled in the art will recognize that there are other means of achieving controlled release of these compounds and mixtures, such as wax matrices, squeeze-sealed polyethylene tubing, and bottles made of other suitable polymers such as plasticized polyvinyl chloride. These can also be used as controlled release systems.
Embodiment 2
[0041] Aiming at different combinations of attractants, the attractiveness of them to the wasps in fruit trees (apple) was compared.
[0042] With the volatile matter described in the embodiment 1 of 500mg, every tree hangs a sachet, and the sachet is the same as embodiment 1, and the sachet of every kind of mixture hangs 10 trees.
[0043] Trees chosen for experiments should be equidistant from the wasp nests placed by fruit growers. The apple orchards used for the experiment had negligible numbers of bees as well as artificially released wall bees.
[0044] The observer selected 5 trees from the trees treated with five volatile compound combinations (50 minutes each), marked 10 clusters of flowers on their north and south sides respectively, and recorded the number of flower visits by wall bees within 1 minute. . No attractants were hung on the trees of the control group.
[0045] The results are shown in Table 2.
[0046] Table 2
[0047]
[0048] As can be seen fro...
Embodiment 3
[0050] To compare the fruit set rate of apple trees in orchards releasing the wall bee for different attractant combinations. The apple orchards used for the experiment had negligible numbers of bees as well as artificially released wall bees.
[0051] Among the five kinds of volatile-treated trees described in Example 2, the observer selected the north and south sides of five trees.
[0052] 10 clusters of flowers on the side branches were used to count the number of high-quality fruit (diameter greater than 20mm is counted as high-quality fruit).
[0053] The results are shown in Table 3.
[0054] Table 3 The number of high-quality fruit per 5x10 flower clusters of apples pollinated by wall bees
[0055]
[0056]
[0057] The number of high-quality fruit was significantly higher in the treated trees, especially in the trees treated with the 50:50 mixture.
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com