Method and composition for adhering to tooth structure
a technology of tooth structure and composition, applied in dental prosthetics, dental impression caps, dentistry, etc., can solve the problems of undesirable use of multi-step procedures, laborious and time-consuming multi-step procedures, etc., and achieve the effect of enhancing the adhesion of dental restorative materials
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0046] This inventive composition was tested for shear bond strength (SBS) using a Single Plane Shear Test Assembly apparatus (SPSTA) as described by L. G. Watanabe, et al., in Journal of Dental Research, 76 (Special Edition) Abs. 1398, 1977 and / or other standard compressive shear bond strength test methods as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,429 which is hereby incorporated by reference for such disclosure, and for example, in Dental Materials, vol. 3; 185, 1987 by Hammesfahr et al. The compositions tested included self curing (SC) and light curing (LC or VLC for “visible light cure”) materials. Further, the inventive materials were tested with etching or non-etching to dental surfaces as will be noted below, and were also compared to various commercially available adhesive products. As will be shown in the following tables, the inventive material shows comparable or improved results over the commercially available products. “SD” as used below is standard deviation, and “Del.” Is d...
example 2
[0048] Using the SPSTA test method, bond strength of different restorative materials to human teeth (dentin) using the inventive composition was evaluated and the results are shown in TABLE II.
TABLE II24 hr. Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorativesto Human Teeth Using The inventive CompositionBONDINGSURFACEInventive24 HourSUBSTRATETREATMENTCompositionRESTORATIVESShear Bond Strength (MPa)DentinEtchedSelf Cure (SC)SC Enforce ™WF11.20 ± 2.5880%DentinEtchedVisible LightSC Enforce ™WF13.93 ± 1.8175%Cure (VLC)DentinEtchedVisible LightSC Enforce ™WF15.47 ± 2.2775%Cure (VLC)DentinEtchedVisible LightVLC Enforce ™WF≧13.67 ± 2.64100%Cure (VLC)DentinUnetchedSelf Cure (SC)SC Enforce ™WF4.18 ± 2.910%DentinUnetchedVisible LightSC Enforce ™WF9.79 ± 3.060%Cure (VLC)DentinEtchedSelf Cure (SC)SC FluoroCore ™8.90 ± 3.033%DentinEtchedVisible LightVLC TPH ™31.34 ± 3.8210%Cure (VLC)SpectrumComposite
[0049] As can be seen from the SBS results in TABLE II (and TABLE III below) the inventive compositio...
example 3
[0050] Using the SBS test method as described in Dental Materials, Vol. 3; 185, 1987, and in the incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,429,24-hour enamel SBS of different restoratives used in direct and / or indirect restorations using the inventive composition was evaluated. The results are summarized in TABLE III.
TABLE III24 Hour SBS* of Different Restoratives to Human Tooth Using the Inventive CompositionBONDINGSURFACEINVENTIVE24 Hrs. SBS (MPa)SUBSTRATETREATMENTCOMPOSITIONRESTORATIVESX ± SD; Enamel Del(%)EnamelEtchedSelf Cure (SC)1SC Enforce ™WF126.8 ± 4.7100%EnamelEtchedVisible Light Cure2(VLC)VLC Enforce ™WF223.7 ± 4.8100%EnamelEtchedVisible Light Cure3(VLC)VLC TPH ™31.0 ± 8.080%Spectrum Composite3
*SBS was tested using Caulk's Compressive Shear Bond Strength Test Method
1Bonding Protocol-1 (total SC): Etched Enamel (Caulk 34% tooth gel / 15″) / P&B 2.1 & SC Activator (1 / 1 premix)[1C / wet, NC] / Enforce(SC)
2Bonding Protocol-2: Etched Enamel (Caulk 34% tooth gel 15″) / P&B 2.1 & SC Activator ...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| weight | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| soluble | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| solubility | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


