Although this
inflatable sleeve successfully abrades the inner walls of the bore, this
system has a number of serious drawbacks.
First, the
diameter of the bore to be abraded is both uncontrollable and non-uniform.
Because of the sleeve is necessarily made of a relatively pliable elastomeric material, the sleeve it does not maintain a uniform
diameter and tends both to
flare out the exposed ends of the bore and under-abrade areas within the bore.
Second, an inflated sleeve cannot be inserted into the bore and, therefore, the tool is not readily adapted for abrading chamfers or anything less than an entire bore.
Finally, the sleeve and tool
system are relatively expensive.
The tool requires a source of
compressed air proximate to the workpiece to be abraded, requiring a significant upfront investment.
Further, the
inflatable sleeve requires laborious fabrication due to the process of attaching the abrading material.
This burdensome process guarantees a high price for a tool that must be discarded after use.
While this invention allows a tool to be inflated to various sizes and to chamfer, its lack of uniformity creates a serious drawback.
Furthermore, this tool hardly stands alone; it requires an air mandrel to expand the sleeve in order to abrade.
Although this tool expands to
grind and polish a hole, any expansion is unmeasurable.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable
drill.
Although this tool is certainly cost-effective, using
sandpaper and no external tools, it
potency is highly suspect.
Second, as a cylinder this tool is incapable of chamfering.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable
drill.
Although this
grinding device allows cost-effective and simple replacements due to the use of conventional
sand paper, the ability to control the diameter to an easily measurable degree is still absent.
While this tool expands without use of a
hand tool or mandrel, all the elaborate intricacies involved in the expansion ensure a hefty tool price.
Also, this tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable
drill.
Although this tool's diameter expands or contracts by rotating a member located on its top, instead of using a pressurized medium, this expanded / contracted diameter is not measurable by the tool.
This expensive material combined with the fact that it is permanently attached to the tool, makes the tool's
reusability impractical.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable drill.
Furthermore, this cylindrical tool is incapable of chamfering.
Although this
grinding device allows cost-effective and simple replacements due to the use of conventional
sand paper, the ability to control the diameter to an easily measurable degree is still absent.
While this tool expands without use of a
hand tool, the elaborate expansion devices ensure a hefty tool price.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable drill.
Furthermore, due to its cylindrical shape, this tool is incapable of chamfering.
Any adjustments, which are minute, are neither readily measurable nor designed to allow an operator to work with holes of differing sizes.
This measurement purely exists to check accuracy, not to allow a machinist with the same tool to finish another differently sized hole.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable drill.
Furthermore, the abrasion is a part of the tool, requiring that the entire tool be discarded after significant abrasion-wear.
Although this invention allows a machinist to replace the abrasives instead of the entire tool; the tool is overly complicated and replacing the abrasives is inconvenient.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable drill.
This attribute is designed to only prevent wear and in no way accurately expands or contracts the
grinding diameter.
This tool could not effectively be used in conjunction with a portable drill.
Although this tool uses inexpensive, although specialized,
sandpaper as an abrasive means, the method of expansion is entirely impractical.
During
honing these small strips are not in sufficient contact with a
support surface to effectively abrade.
Using
centrifugal force to expand an abrasive against an interior surface of a hole will frequently be inadequate.
Also, these individual strands of
sandpaper are more delicate than many jobs will require.
While this type of sandpaper fits into a tube, it is wholly inadequate to expand or chamfer a hole.
This paper is also restricted in the types of materials and shapes that it may sand, as the exposed edges on the front sheet of the star tend to catch On most non-uniform surfaces causing the edges to bend against the direction of
radial motion exposing the non-abrading rear surface of the sandpaper to a workpiece.
In addition, the use of multiple sheets of sandpaper makes these
stars relatively stiff and unsuited to freely conform to the inside surfaces of bores.
Finally, as a
metal fastener must mechanically join the two pieces of specially
cut sandpaper, the cost of these
stars tends to be relatively high.