Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Mass comparison testing method and system

A test method and a test system technology, applied in the database field, to achieve the effects of ensuring effectiveness, reducing test manpower, and increasing test coverage

Active Publication Date: 2018-04-03
PING AN TECH (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
View PDF5 Cites 4 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] In view of this, the object of the present invention is to provide a large-scale comparative testing method and system to solve the problem of how to conduct full-coverage comparative testing of the premium receivable system before and after versions

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Mass comparison testing method and system
  • Mass comparison testing method and system
  • Mass comparison testing method and system

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

no. 1 example

[0043] Such as figure 1 As shown, the first embodiment of the present invention proposes a large-scale comparative testing method, which method includes the following steps:

[0044] S100, setting a rollback point of a large batch of comparative test databases.

[0045] Specifically, according to the set rollback point, after the rollback of the large-batch comparison test database is performed subsequently, the data state in the large-batch comparison test database will be restored to the state of the rollback point. Pay attention to the time when setting the rollback point, because the rollback represents the rollback of the database state. Once rolled back, both data and code will be rolled back.

[0046] It is worth noting that since the state of the data will change after running the code, if you delete the data to perform the comparison test between the previous version and the previous version, the data may not be deleted cleanly, which will affect the results of the c...

no. 2 example

[0064] Such as figure 2 As shown, the second embodiment of the present invention proposes a large-scale comparative testing method. In the second embodiment, the steps of the large batch comparative testing method are similar to those in the first embodiment, the main difference is that steps S204 and S210 are added on the basis of the first embodiment. The method specifically includes the following steps:

[0065] S200, setting a rollback point of a large batch of comparative test databases.

[0066] Specifically, according to the set rollback point, after the rollback of the large-batch comparison test database is performed subsequently, the data state in the large-batch comparison test database will be restored to the state of the rollback point. Pay attention to the time when setting the rollback point, because the rollback represents the rollback of the database state. Once rolled back, both data and code will be rolled back.

[0067] It is worth noting that since the...

no. 3 example

[0089] Such as image 3 As shown, the third embodiment of the present invention proposes a large batch comparative testing method. In the third embodiment, the steps of the large-scale comparative testing method are similar to those in the second embodiment, the main difference is that step S300 and step S302 are added on the basis of the second embodiment. The method specifically includes the following steps:

[0090] S300, setting the range and time for acquiring basic data.

[0091]Specifically, it is set to capture the data of the specified due date range (usually the next month), and the capture time can be controlled by setting the corresponding program switch to capture a batch of basic data regularly.

[0092] S302. Acquire the basic data into the large batch comparison test database according to the set range and time.

[0093] Specifically, grab the data of the specified due date range according to the set time, obtain the basic data that meets the conditions, and...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The invention discloses a mass comparison testing method and system. The method comprises the following steps that: setting the roll-back point of a mass comparison testing database; according to basic data in the mass comparison testing database, calculating insurance premiums receivable, obtaining first result data; according to the arranged roll-back point, carrying out the roll-back of the mass comparison testing database; after a new version code is deployed, calculating the insurance premiums receivable again, and obtaining second result data; comparing the first result data with the second result data, and judging whether differences are in the presence or not; and analyzing the differences, and judging whether the differences are caused by the program defects of the new version code. Therefore, the old version and new version comparison testing of the system of the insurance premiums receivable can be carried out in a full-coverage way.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of databases, in particular to a method and system for large-scale comparison testing. Background technique [0002] At present, when the life insurance system calculates the premium receivable of the next period, the system business scenario is complex, and the data interface that needs to be called carries a very large amount of information. After the system business function is upgraded, generally only routine function verification is performed, the data covered by the system test may not be comprehensive enough, and there is a lack of an effective automated test method to cover all test data. [0003] However, if you rely on the traditional manual method to check data, the following problems may occur: it consumes a lot of manpower and is inefficient; new services may affect the normal operation of old functions, and traditional verification methods cannot fully cover all functions; The amount of data t...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): G06F11/36
CPCG06F11/3684G06F11/3688G06F11/3692
Inventor 邓亦超
Owner PING AN TECH (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com