Building independent structural frame inner reinforcement nucleiform anti-vibration refuge compartment and molding method thereof

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for reinforcing a kernel-shaped quake-proof refuge cabin in the independent frame of a building, and the molding method thereof. 1 the quake-proof refuge cabin of the invention determines the better principle of refuge and escape when an earthquake occurs, namely, (1) life priority: the protection of the life is a priority selection; (2) hedging nearby; (3) escaping by selecting chances. 2 different from generally known building reinforcing and pre-set reinforcing techniques, the invention is a new quake-proof additional system of the building, adopts the independent in-frame reinforcing technique, and carries out reinforcement from the interior of certain singletons or local units of the building so as to form the refuge cabin used for protecting the life; 3 the invention adopts dual structure, and the quake-proof refuge cabin is formed by taking existing buildings or newly-built buildings as a shell to co-act with internal hard kernel-shaped quake-proof refuge cabin structure with the independent frame. The invention is suitable for most existing buildings or new buildings, and constructs a system that hedging is carried out nearby and the protection of the life is prior together with other quake-proof measures of the buildings.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to construction and public disaster reduction industries, in particular to a new type of building—a nuclear-shaped anti-seismic refuge cabin reinforced in an independent frame of the building and a forming method thereof. Background technique [0002] Earthquakes are a natural disaster. When an earthquake comes, the public often lacks precautionary measures, especially the public in multi-storey or high-rise buildings, and cannot find a fast and effective place and method for avoiding disasters nearby when an earthquake comes. If you escape from the building blindly and cannot reach the open area quickly, you will be easily injured by falling objects above the building. The damage caused by the earthquake can be divided into physical and psychological. The known construction technology pays attention to the strength of the building itself, and then protects people's lives. However, when an earthquake comes, through the safety di...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0013] Steel structure buildings have relatively good earthquake resistance, but the cost is high, and it is difficult to popularize them on a large scale in a large number of civil buildings

For buildings using reinforced concrete structures, there are also some problems in the seismic design and construction of this building structure, which is the contradiction between setting the seismic rating and the construction cost: in the overall building, choosing a higher seismic rating can resist earthquakes more effectively Disasters, but at the same time it will greatly increase the construction cost, which has caused certain restrictions on the further popularization of construction products

At present, there is still a defect in most reinforced concrete building structures: that is, in the load-bearing structures of most public buildings and residential buildings, a large amount of load is borne by "load-bearing walls". At the intersection of different axes of X\Y\Z, it is often used to lap and tie on site, and then pour concrete to fix it

However, this option also has shortcomings, that is, if the earthquake resistance level of the building is increased, the construction cost will be increased to a large extent, which is less feasible in underdeveloped areas; there is another deficiency, that is, when an earthquake occurs, Due to the relatively open internal space and large door and window openings of the known civil buildings, the overall earthquake resistance of the buildings is reduced, which increases the uncertainty of safety and risk avoidance in earthquakes; there is also a lack of link, which is the known civil buildings. In the manuals of construction products (such as design manuals, sales brochures) and other documents, there is no introduction of "earthquake avoidance devices in buildings"

To sum up, in the known planning, design and construction of civil buildings, the design and practice of the definite space of "earthquake avoidance in buildings" at the normative and standard level have not been found, and there is no similar "fire escape route". "Earthquake avoidance and escape channel", which caused some people to panic when the earthquake occurred. They didn't know which space in the building could better protect themselves, so that they blindly moved to the public during the dangerous period when the earthquake or aftershocks occurred. Evacuation outside the building, resulting in casualties hit by falling objects during escape

[0018] Known building structures lack an anti-seismic refuge device that directly protects the living body when an earthquake occurs. This is a major omission in the building's earthquake avoidance link, causing the public to avoid earthquake disasters in high-rise or multi-storey buildings. , space selection has great uncertainty

Images