A method for evaluating the academic ability of scientific researchers

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the academic ability of scientific researchers. The evaluation method comprises: obtaining a paper pool for evaluating academic ability; cleaning all data in the paper pool; calculating a journal impact factor standard value IFNOR=IFV / lambda;; constructing a author's adjacency matrix, a paper and paper reference journal matrix; according to the author's adjacency matrix, making the collaborator network diagram, detecting the scientific research team by using a clustering resolution coefficient, making the net file for each scientific research team, and determining the composition of its members and the cooperation relationship among its members; constructing a scientific research team and paper matrix; calculating the paper reference journalvalue RFV _ d = Sigma IFNOR, calculating a team reference journal value RFV _ t = Sigma RFV _ d; calculating the European standard value BPV of the Bonasitz index of each member in the scientific research team; calculating ( shown in the description). That present application enableS a prospective evaluation of the academic abilities of scientific researcher using LV at the beginning of the publication of the paper, and the results are scientifically valid.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the field of evaluating the academic ability of scientific research personnel, and in particular relates to an evaluation method for the academic ability of scientific research personnel. Background technique [0002] The current evaluation methods for the academic ability of imported talents and scientific research personnel, in addition to inviting experts in this field to conduct qualitative evaluations, generally use some quantitative indicators for evaluation. These quantitative indicators are usually selected from the papers as the starting point, such as the citation frequency of the papers written by the evaluators, the impact factors of the journals in which the papers are published, etc. The number of citations is a quantitative expression of the degree of recognition of the academic value of the paper by the academic community, and it is a characterization of the quality of the paper. [0003] However, the artificia...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] However, the artificial qualitative evaluation system lacks a unified scale and standard, which is not conducive to the construction of a profitable and scientific talent evaluation system; and the conventionally selected quantitative indicators also have certain defects. In fact, the citation frequency of papers is directly used for Rewarding scientific and technological personnel or evaluating the academic ability of scholars has always been controversial

[0004] First of all, the citation frequency of a paper starts from the date of its birth, and is branded as "retrospective". For researchers who have just engaged in academic research, the citation frequency of their paper cannot accurately reflect their academic potential. Frequent evaluation of their academic ability is difficult to be fair, which is not conducive to the discovery and cultivation of new talents in the current era

[0005] Secondly, once a paper is published, its citation frequency is completely divorced from the scholar's academic status, but is always in a state of growth, and the author's h-index only increases, so the evaluation system based on the citation frequency of the paper is not conducive to Talent building

[0006] Third, similarly, since the citations of papers are always in a state of growth, the final result of the citations of papers is undeterminable. To measure the academic ability of researchers with undeterminable indicators, its effectiveness and scientific unknown

However, determining the author's contribution to the paper in the order of the author's ranking is also flawed, because the number of authors in different papers is not the same, for example, the 10th author in a paper with 10 collaborators It is difficult to distinguish the magnitude of the substantive contribution to the corresponding paper from the author who ranks 11th in the paper with 100 authors; and now many core authors (authors who make the main substantive contribution to the paper ) is often not ranked first in papers, and its position is not fixed

[0008] It can be seen that the selection of quantitative indicators to evaluate the academic ability of scientific researchers with papers as the entry point has essential defects

Images