Comptuer recoding information system for court

Abstract

A computer recording system for judicial procedure consists of a central computer database managing server, a computer monitor managing system, and sub-systems of terminals for multi-track recorders to collect and process data in real time. The sub-system consists of a terminal, a multi-channel audio signal converting card, and a multi-channel pre-amplifier, and several microphones. Each microphone is set for one person, such as plaintiff, defendant, etc. It can control all the recording operation and provide written records.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of computer information automation, in particular to a computer recording information system used in litigation or non-litigation court hearings, and can also be used in conferences with similar purposes. Background technique [0002] The development of computer automation technology is changing with each passing day, and the trial of cases in the court is a highly procedural work that is prone to errors. However, at present, when courts try cases, there is still no ideal high-efficiency, high-efficiency device or system that can record and save court case information, generate documents, consult, integrate in-process and post-event supervision, and have a high degree of automation to solve this problem. In particular, the record of the court trial is completely recorded by the clerk in court, and the parties rely on the parties to check the court record according to their memories when the court is closed, which has ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, at present, when courts try cases, there is still no ideal high-efficiency, high-efficiency device or system that can record and save court case information, generate documents, consult, integrate in-process and post-event supervision, and have a high degree of automation to solve this problem. In particular, the record of the court trial is completely recorded by the clerk in court, and the parties rely on the parties to check the court record according to their memories when the court is closed, which has the disadvantages of labor-intensive, time-consuming, and inevitable omissions. Of course, the supervisory department cannot monitor the actual situation of the court hearings in real time and at any time. It can only be checked after the court hearing based on the transcripts, which is difficult to guarantee judicial fairness.

Images