Competition management system and method based on network

Abstract

The invention discloses a competition management system and a method based on network which includes registering through network and setting evaluating indexes; planning and organizing a competition, treating and issuing competition result, updating the evaluating indexes; carrying out integral ranking according to the evaluating indexes; the invention further includes inviting a competition and a knockout tournament through the network as well as carrying out qualification management and matching. The competition management system and the method of the invention has the advantages of breaking the restrictions of time, place, personnel, facilities and contact ways of various competitions, improving the competition involvement, reducing the organizing and managing costs of the competitions and promoting the economic and social values of the competitions.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to a competition management system and method, in particular to a competition management system and method through the network. Background technique [0002] In the field of traditional competition management, there are three problems: [0003] First of all, because event management matters such as event registration, qualification review, race schedule arrangement, game notification, score record, ranking, and score release are basically handled manually, there are high labor costs, long processing cycles, high error rates, and transparency. Low and insufficient. Although some event organizers have begun to use e-mail, website publishing and other technologies to improve the traditional manual processing to a certain extent, there is still no effective connection between the various links of competition management, and the processing process is not automated. Insufficiencies such as information redundancy, information i...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] First of all, because event management matters such as event registration, qualification review, race schedule arrangement, game notification, score record, ranking, and score release are basically handled manually, there are high labor costs, long processing cycles, high error rates, and transparency. Insufficient

Although some event organizers have begun to use e-mail, website publishing and other technologies to improve the traditional manual processing to a certain extent, there is still no effective connection between the various links of competition management, and the processing process is not automated. Insufficiencies such as information redundancy, information inconsistency, and untimely processing

The special management system used by some large-scale events or games is only for a single event or a single game, which has low versatility and high construction costs. It cannot effectively connect between multiple events or games, and the reuse rate is low. Continuity Low

[0004] Second, the problem of "gold medal orientation" is prominent

The "gold medal-oriented" competition management method has the disadvantages of being closed and mandatory, with many restrictions, poor mass base, and low participation

The "gold medal-oriented" evaluation index is relatively one-sided. All parties in the competition are fighting for the final gold medal. Their goals and interests are highly conflicting. They often do not obey the referee's punishment. normal means

[0005] Third, there is a one-to-many star structure between the event organizer and the contestants, which is similar to the B2C model. The event organizer is the producer of event management services, and the contestants are consumers of event management services. Event organizers It is the "bottleneck" of competition management, which is not conducive to large-scale development

Images