Method of treating a formation using deformable proppants
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
case # 1
[0048] Case#1
[0049] A sandstone formation in Alberta, Canada was treated with conventional fracturing techniques with initial flow rates being too small to measure (TSTM). A similar treatment on the same formation utilizing 2270 kg of light weight polystyrene divinyl benzene deformable proppant (CBM-LWP) with a specific gravity of 1.05 was placed in stages. Each stage was engineered to place proppant within the fracture at a concentration of 0.0825 kg / m2. Proppant was pumped at a concentration between 25 and 150 kg / m3 of carrier fluid. After initial flow back, the well produced measurable gas and the subsequent pressure build up and analysis showed a stimulated well.
case # 2
[0050] Case#2
[0051] A dry coal (Horse Shoe Canyon Formation) in Alberta, Canada is normally treated with high rate nitrogen fracturing. A well from the field was fractured using 330 kg of light weight polystyrene divinyl benzene deformable proppant (CBM-LWP) in each of two coal seams. Each stage was engineered to place proppant within the fracture at a concentration of 0.0825 kg / m2. Proppant was pumped at a concentration of approximately 13 kg / m3 of carrier fluid. After initial 300 hour flowback, gas rates were higher than surrounding wells.
[0052] As used herein, “crush” means catastrophic failure of the proppant and “deformation” means any change in shape of the proppant.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


