Floorboards, flooring systems and method for manufacturing and installation thereof

Abstract

Floorboards with a format corresponding to a traditional parquet block for laying of mechanically joined floating flooring. Rectangular floorboards include a surface layer and a core with two long sides and two short sides, for making a floating flooring, which floorboards are mechanically lockable and which along their four sides have pairs of opposing connectors for locking similar, adjoining floorboards to each other both vertically and horizontally wherein the long sides have a length not exceeding 80 cm and the short sides have a width not exceeding 10 cm.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 730,131, filed Dec. 9, 2003, which is a continuation application of PCT / SE03 / 00641, filed on Apr. 22, 2003, which claims the priority of SE 0201225-0 and SE 0203482-5. The present application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 431,699, filed on Dec. 9, 2002. The contents of PCT / SE03 / 00641; SE 0201225-0; SE 0203482-5; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 431,699 are hereby incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The invention relates generally to the field of floorboards. The invention concerns floorboards which can be joined mechanically in different patterns so as to resemble traditional parquet flooring comprising blocks. The invention also relates to methods for laying and manufacturing floorboards. The invention is specifically suited for use in floating flooring which comprises floorboards having a ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0027] Modern production technology and mechanical joint systems in combination with special laying methods make it possible to join very small floorboards quickly and with extremely great accuracy. A surprising result is that flooring which comprises small floorboards can be installed almost as quickly and with the same quality as traditional flooring comprising considerably larger floorboards. It is also possible to provide an installation which is quicker and gives a better result than large floorboards with mechanical joint systems. The reason is that we have discovered that small floorboards are easier to handle, the frictional surfaces along the long sides of the joint portions will be smaller, which facilitates displacement, and finally snapping-in of the short side can take place with lower force since the parts that are bent in connection with snapping-in are smaller and afford less resistance. An additional advantage is that the short side of narrow floorboards could be produced with a locking system, which only locks horizontally and which do not require a vertical snap. Such a locking system could be accomplished by, for example, removing the tongue 22 on the short side of a rectangular floorboard with a locking system similar to FIG. 3b. The narrow short sides (5a, 5b) of two locked floorboards will nevertheless be held in the desired vertical position by the locked long sides (4a, 4b), in a floor where the floorboards are installed in parallel rows with offset short sides (see FIGS. 9f, 4a-4d). Such a floor could be installed very easy, since the installation only requires an angling of the long sides. Floorboards could be produced with an angling locking system on long side and without any locking system on the short side at all. The short sides could be kept together by the friction of the long sides or by gluing and / or nailing down the floorboards to the sub-floor. Such narrow short sides could be installed faster but with the same high quality as wide short sides. Conversely, wider short sides, without any vertical locking system, would increase the risk of the short sides becoming warped, thus creating an uneven floor.

[0045] According to another embodiment, the connecting means may comprise a separate part, which projects from the joint edge and which is mechanically joined with a core of the floorboard. Such a separate part may be utilized to instead of removing material from the edge of the floorboard, thus reducing the amount of material waste.

Problems solved by technology

The machining of the joint edges to form floorboards is an expensive operation in all types of floor materials.

It is also known that small sizes of floor panels would cause disadvantages in a floor, especially in a floor where the floorboards are rectangular and narrow, thus having a large amount of joints at the long sides of the narrow panels.

It is known that small-sized floorboards with mechanical locking systems would be more expensive to produce than similar panels with traditional tongue and groove systems.

It is also known that mechanical locking systems, which enable a high quality locking with angling, due to the larger amount of material required for forming the locking system, are generally more costly and complicated to machine than the more compact snap systems.

Mechanical locking systems of any kind on the long sides of a rectangular panel are in general more costly to produce than any type of mechanical locking system on the short sides.

Installation with vertical snapping is complicated and there is a considerable risk that the edges or part of the locking system is damaged during locking or unlocking.

A further problem which causes an unnatural appearance is related to the manufacturing technology.

In connection with impregnating, the decorative paper swells in an uncontrolled manner.

The swelling and the manufacturing tolerances arising in connection with laminating, sawing and machining along the edges result in the position of the blocks in different floorboards deviating from the desired position.

All these circumstances cause great manufacturing problems in connection with manufacture of laminate flooring with a 3-block parquet pattern.

In order to solve these problems, a number of expensive methods have been used to control the manufacturing process when making laminate flooring.

All prior-art methods give an unsatisfactory result.

All these systems cause waste W. This waste arises in connection with sawing (SB) and in connection with machining of the mechanical connecting means.

Conversely, wider short sides, without any vertical locking system, would increase the risk of the short sides becoming warped, thus creating an uneven floor.

Small floorboards certainly contain essentially more joints per square meter of floor than large floorboards and the machining cost as well as the amount of waste are great when using the prior-art mechanical joint systems.

Such a Abanana shape≅ may cause visible joint gaps.

Images