Circuit design online review method and system, medium, equipment, terminal and application

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of online circuit design review, and discloses a circuit design online review method and system, a medium, equipment, a terminal and an application. The method comprises the steps of starting a login system, creating a review project to fill in project information, and starting a review process; selecting a design object, filling in opinion information,and submitting or storing review opinions; establishing long-acting connection between a client and a server, and pushing communication content; outputting a report, quickly outputting a report filein a specified format and storing the report file locally; archiving the file; carrying out enterprise knowledge base management; and carrying out data statistical analysis. According to the method, design review opinions are rapidly collected and gathered on line and fed back to designers, the design review opinions and design tools are developed and integrated, the review opinions and design data are bound, the designers can position questions through one key, restore question views and modify and reply the review opinions in time, the efficiency of the design review process is greatly improved, resource waste caused by repeated conference holding is avoided, and the design period is accelerated.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of online circuit design review, and in particular relates to a circuit design online review method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application. Background technique [0002] As we all know, excellent electronic systems usually require engineers to design rigorously, strictly follow the design guidelines and experience to accurately grasp every design detail, in order to ensure the production of high-quality works. Traditional design needs to face signal integrity, power integrity, electromagnetic characteristics, Requirements such as process manufacturability and design standardization and standardization are often cross-reviewed by professional or senior technical personnel within the company after the completion of the circuit design, sorting out feedback and suggestions, and handing over to the designer to modify and then review iterations, which will lead to review The process is time-consuming...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] (1) The review process is time-consuming and labor-intensive, with difficult personnel organization, high communication costs, and long review cycles

[0006] (2) It is impossible to carry out the review process of experts’ opinions and the process of designers modifying the design at the same time. Designers must wait for all the review opinions to be summarized before modifying the problem.

Moreover, the modification situation cannot be fed back to the experts in time, and the two parties cannot communicate in time for specific issues, resulting in low development efficiency and delaying the project progress

[0007] (3) There is no unified management of the review data, the review process cannot be shared in real time, and the review progress cannot be monitored in real time

The opinions and revisions of the review process cannot be synchronized in real time, and multiple experts may raise the same opinion or multiple designers may modify the same problem, resulting in repetitive work by multiple people

[0008] (4) Review opinions and design data are separated, and opinions are recorded in the form of opinion content descriptions or screenshots. The process is unreliable and the quality of research and development cannot be guaranteed.

It is difficult to quickly locate the specific location of the problem in the design through the opinion record, which increases the workload of the modification process and reduces the efficiency of research and development

[0009] (5) There is no record of the entire review and modification process, and data such as review comments cannot be traced back. It can only rely on manual coordination to collect review materials, organize review reports and other reports according to the enterprise template, record the final electronic or paper comments and revision documents, and file them. The documentation process is confusing and cumbersome

[0010] (6) The process of statistical analysis is lacking, and it is impossible to intuitively calculate the workload of personnel and the number of design problems through data.

[0011] (7) Lack of unified management of the knowledge base accumulated by enterprises such as design experience, which cannot be quickly referenced in the review and standardize the design requirements

[0013] (1) Existing technology review process is time-consuming and laborious, personnel organization is difficult, communication cost is high, and review period is long; the two parties cannot communicate in time for specific issues, resulting in low development efficiency and delaying project progress; review data is not managed uniformly, and the review process cannot be real-time Sharing, unable to monitor the progress of the review in real time

[0014] (2) Existing technology review opinions and design data are separated, it is difficult to quickly locate the specific location of the problem in the design through opinion records, increase the workload of the modification process, and the research and development efficiency is low; record the final electronic or paper opinions and Modify files, the process of archiving files is confusing and cumbersome

[0015] (3) The existing technology lacks the process of statistical analysis, and cannot intuitively calculate the workload of personnel and the number of design problems through data; it lacks the unified management of the knowledge base accumulated by enterprises such as design experience, and cannot be quickly referenced in the review to standardize the design. Require

Images