A long standing concern has been the frequency of damage claims arising from vandalism and theft of the rail car cargo.
These openings may weaken the structural integrity of the door, making the door less secure.
In addition to possibly weakening the door, these slots might be used to insert a pry or other object to gain unauthorized access to the rail car.
The slots may also permit contaminants such as dirt and other foreign matter to enter the rail car, potentially damaging the rail car lading.
These ladders are preferably secured to the rail car body structure generally and are subject to vibration during operation of the rail car.
In cars in which the door extends past the height of the top chord to obstruct access to the gable end, the positioning of the brace may tend to present design challenges.
However this notch may tend to weaken the door and may also tend to permit dirt and other unwanted substances to enter the interior of the rail car.
It has been observed that multi-panel, hinged doors may tend to require more maintenance, and more care in operation generally, than rigid panel radial arm doors.
Further, each hinge, or opening, or crack may tend to provide a location at which vandals or thieves may seek access to the cars, or a point at which parts can be misaligned.
This uneven weight distribution may cause the roller assembly nearest the tangent portion to wear prematurely.
Difficulties may arise if forces transverse to the track are applied to the door.
For example, in the normal course of operation, the track may sag after years of operation under the weight of the door.
If the track sags, the rollers may tend to work their way off the track surface.
Alternatively, ice or some other obstruction may form or become lodged between the track and the roller.
If the extension becomes deformed then the door may not open and close properly.
Similarly, if the track itself is not adequately supported then the track and door may begin to sag with extended use, causing similar difficulties.
Even without obstructions or misuse of the door, the extension and track may wear out sooner than may be desirable if the track is constructed using relatively thin pieces of steel or other metal.
The roller and track arrangement described above may also leave a gap between the bottom edge of the door and the track.
The presence of dirt and debris in particular may inhibit the roller from rotating if the dirt becomes lodged between the roller and its axis, or may hasten wear.
Potentially damaging dirt and debris may also enter the rail car via gaps formed along the attachment interface between the rail car roof and the top chord of the wall assemblies.
This may tend to occur when a corrugated roof structure is used.
Although the door obtains some stiffness from its arcuate shape, the large door area may be relatively vulnerable to damage, and may be prone to relatively large deflections.
Given the area of coverage of the door, even a relatively thin shell of steel sheet may have a considerable weight, particularly when fitted out with locks, rollers and other door hardware.
Thus, it is undesirable to increase the general thickness of the door to obtain greater stiffness, since there is an inherent weight penalty.
However, it has been observed that welded reinforcements in doors may tend to be initiation sites for fatigue cracks, and even when repaired, may tend to crack again.
However, this did not necessarily prevent determined thieves or vandals from climbing over the top of the door to obtain access to vehicles carried on the highest deck.
A disadvantage in many of these cases is the need to notch the door to accommodate the ladder support structure as noted above.
Further, since the door tended not to be restrained at the roof line, the gable end portion of the door tended to be relatively weak.