Automatic test method and device for radio-frequency performance comparison

Abstract

The invention relates to the communication field, and discloses an automatic test method and device for radio-frequency performance comparison. According to the invention, the method comprises the following steps of: presetting a complete comparison file template, determining comparison test items of a product according to the comparison requirement, carrying out the critical test of each comparison test item automatically, and storing the test results in the data file. A background data processing software automatically inputs the comparison data result to the comparison file template, and creates a comparison test file for the testing personnel to get the comparison conclusion. The test efficiency of the radio-frequency performance comparison and the data processing efficiency are improved, the artificial complexity is reduced, and the effect of rapid comparison is achieved.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the communication field, in particular to the terminal testing technology in the communication field. Background technique [0002] The radio frequency index and performance index of the product will be clearly stipulated in the radio frequency conformance test specification, such as Time Division-Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access (Time Division-Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access, referred to as "TD-SCDMA") radio frequency index and performance index specification It is 3gPP 25.102, the radio frequency index and performance index specification of the Global System of Mobile Communication (GSM) is 45.005, and the test methods involved also have clear specifications, such as the relevant test specifications of TD-SCDMA It is 34.122, and the relevant test specification for GSM is 51.010. However, among the products that meet the requirements of radio frequency consistency, their radio frequency performance is diffe...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] However, the RF performance comparison of many similar products requires a lot of work and high complexity

The reason is that with the development of mobile communications, the RF conformance test is becoming more and more perfect, and there are many RF comparison test items; the RF comparison test items need to detect the extreme state, and the critical state test itself is more troublesome and takes a long time; in addition, the current Terminal products support multi-mode and multi-band, and the multi-mode and multi-band RF comparison test items add up to a considerable amount. The amount of test data is large, and it takes a long time. The test platform also requires various forms, and it takes a lot of time to build a test platform.

On the other hand, the method of data processing uses a large number of sub-items or several sub-items for corresponding comparisons. The test data processing workload is very heavy, and there are many charts.

[0005] Moreover, although the RF performance comparison of various similar products is complicated, the macro effect is not ideal

Although the data comparison chart is intuitive, due to the large amount of charts, it cannot reflect the overall performance in a concentrated manner, resulting in a large amount of work to summarize the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the RF performance.

[0006] In addition, the RF performance comparison of various similar products adopts the method of manual recording and manual data processing, which is prone to errors due to the large amount of data; manual conversion of multiple platforms brings difficulties in tracing data and rework; long time consumption may lead to the same The test items use test platforms in different periods, which brings a lot of workload such as environment confirmation

And due to the large amount of testing, this kind of work sometimes requires division of labor and cooperation. Generally, the division of labor can only be done in different modes, and more detailed division of labor will bring more time for communication.

[0007] All in all, the traditional RF performance comparison test method is inefficient. Although data processing can be used for comprehensive testing, it is not intuitive for decision makers, and it is impossible to grasp the pros and cons of the macroscopic RF performance within a limited time.

Images