Regression test method and device

Abstract

The invention provides a regression test method and device. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring a regression test path to be subjected to a regression test; setting a test priority of the regression test path based on the use information related to the regression test path, and generating a test case priority configuration file; performing regression testing on the regression testing paths with different testing priorities according to the testing case priority configuration file, and performing data verification on obtained regression testing data; and recording the regression test paths which do not pass the data verification, the path parameters of the regression test paths and the corresponding regression test data. In the scheme, the test priorities are set for the regression test paths to be subjected to the regression test in the system, the regression test paths with different test priorities are subjected to the regression test according to the test cases, and the obtained regression test data is subjected to data verification, so that the reliability of the regression test is guaranteed, the regression test efficiency is improved, and meanwhile, the regression test cost is also reduced.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of software testing, in particular to a regression testing method and device. Background technique [0002] In order to improve user experience and expand new business lines, software systems are frequently updated and iterated during the software cycle. In order to reduce the problems caused by frequent updates and iterations, we usually need to test in time. The modification of the software code may have defects in the newly added functions, and may also affect the original code. Therefore, the system needs to be fully tested by means of regression testing. [0003] At present, the regression testing methods in the prior art are mainly divided into two types. One regression testing method adopts manual full-function testing by testers and manually checks the results. However, this method requires a lot of time and manpower, resulting in high regression testing efficiency. The amplitude is reduced, and i...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] At present, the regression testing methods in the prior art are mainly divided into two types. One regression testing method uses manual full-function testing by testers and manually checks the results. However, this method requires a lot of time and manpower, resulting in high regression testing efficiency. The amplitude is reduced, and it is easy to produce artificial error detection results

Another way of regression testing is to run automated test cases and verify simple data at the same time. However, this method usually selects use cases with higher priority for regression testing. This kind of non-full-function regression testing will lead to omissions of individual functions; in addition, Only verifying individual fields in the returned data will cause the omission of defects. If all fields are verified, the test results need to be manually maintained every time the regression test is executed, and it is also easy to produce false detection results

[0004] It can be seen that the regression testing methods in the prior art are either low in testing efficiency, or prone to test omissions or artificial error detection results, and cannot guarantee the testing efficiency and reliability of regression testing.

Images