Methods and Apparatuses for Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide from Biogas

a technology of biogas and hydrogen sulfide, which is applied in the field of methods and apparatuses for removing hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide from biogas, can solve the problems of adversely affecting human health, affecting human health, and affecting human health, so as to reduce capital and maintenance costs, reduce maintenance costs, and simple

Inactive Publication Date: 2016-09-01
KENNEDY NICHOLAS +4
View PDF2 Cites 3 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

This approach effectively decreases H2S and CO2 concentrations, improving biogas purity and energy potential, enabling its use as a cleaner fuel while minimizing chemical usage and disposal costs.

Problems solved by technology

Livestock confinement facilities generate large amounts of animal waste that can create serious environmental and human health concerns.
For example, animal waste constituents such as organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogens and metals can degrade water quality, air quality, and adversely impact human health.
Organic matter, for example, contains a high amount of biodegradable organics and when discharged to surface waters will compete for, and deplete the limited amount of dissolved oxygen available, causing fish kills and other undesirable impacts.
Similarly nutrient loading from nitrogen and phosphorus can lead to eutrophication of surface waters.
Adoption of anaerobic digesters on US dairies is growing but still slow with numbers insufficient to meet the agreement between the US and its dairy industry to reduce climate impacts from dairies by 25% by 2020 (USDA, 2010).
H2S, which is produced by the breakdown of proteins and other sulfur containing compounds during hydrolysis, is detrimental to an internal combustion engine as well as to the environment and human health.
Even at low concentrations, H2S has an unpleasant odor and can be life threatening (Speece 1996).
Furthermore, this contaminant is highly non-desirable in energy-recovery processes because it converts to unhealthy and environmentally hazardous sulfur dioxide (SO2) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) (Abatzoglou and Boivin 2009).
CO2 is not detrimental to equipment or human health like other impurities, but because of its comparatively high presence in biogas, it does decrease the energy potential of biogas, due to its inert nature.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods and Apparatuses for Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide from Biogas
  • Methods and Apparatuses for Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide from Biogas
  • Methods and Apparatuses for Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide from Biogas

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0327]The aim of these experiments was to determine the selectivity of H2S over CO2 from biogas as well as the H2S removal efficiency of an alkaline effluent, produced as a by-product of anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery, as a function of sparger design, effluent height in the reactor and superficial gas velocity.

[0328]Materials and Methods

[0329]A. Nutrient Recovery Process

[0330]Anaerobically digested dairy effluent was obtained from a dairy processing manure from 5,000 cows via a mesophilic complete mixed plug flow digester (DVO Inc., Chilton Wis.), with a hydraulic retention time of around 21 days. Fiber was separated from the effluent with a slope screen, 0.5 cm mesh (US Farms, Tulene, Calif., USA). The effluent was stored in plastic buckets at 15-20° C. in a temperature controlled room.

[0331]The pretreatment of the effluent, depicting a NH3 stripping process (Zhao et al., 2012), involved extended physical aeration (˜46 L·min−1) of post AD / fiber-separated dairy manure at ...

example 2

[0347]This experiment was designed to investigate the effects the height of the bubble column would have on H2S removal.

[0348]The G / L ratio at 95% H2S removal was further enhanced by decreasing the effluent height in the reactor. The effluent heights tested were 0.072, 0.13, 0.27, 0.42, and 0.48 m. The superficial gas velocity was held constant at 0.0073 m·s−1. Since a significant increase in the selectivity resulted from the use of the inlet orifice in the previous sparger experiment, the same diameter inlet orifice was used as the gas injector in the remainder of experiments.

[0349]FIG. 11 graphically illustrates how the effluent height affects the H2S removal efficiency as function of G / L ratio. At a height of 0.072 m the G / L ratio achieved roughly 21:1, while at an effluent height of 0.48 m the G / L ratio dropped to roughly 12:1. An increase of 43% on the G / L ratio, at a removal efficiency of 95%, resulted by decreasing the effluent height.

example 3

[0350]This experiment was designed to investigate the effects gas velocity would have on H2S removal.

[0351]The G / L ratio at 95% H2S removal was also enhanced by increasing the superficial gas velocity. The superficial gas velocity was altered while the effluent height was kept constant at 0.27 m. The superficial gas velocities tested were 0.0022, 0.0037, 0.0073, 0.011, 0.015 m·s−1.

[0352]FIG. 12 graphically illustrates how the superficial gas velocity affects the H2S removal efficiency as function of G / L ratio. An increase in the G / L ratio at 95% H2S removal resulted from 0.002 to 0.015 m·s−1. The G / L ratio at 95% removal increased from around 12:1 to 17:1, which is equivalent to a 29% increase in the amount of biogas that can be purified per effluent.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
concentrationsaaaaaaaaaa
concentrationsaaaaaaaaaa
concentrationsaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Methods, systems and apparatuses herein provide a unique and novel process to remove H2S from biogas. Methods, systems and apparatuses herein provide a unique and novel process to remove H2S from biogas with ease of operation and reduced operating and capital costs. Methods, systems and apparatuses herein provide a unique and novel process to remove H2S over CO2 from biogas.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is a divisional patent application of Ser. No. 13 / 834,494 filed Mar. 15, 2013, which is continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13 / 157,907 filed Jun. 10, 2011 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,613,894 on Dec. 24, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61 / 354,156 filed Jun. 11, 2010. Each of the above-referenced applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.REFERENCE TO GOVERNMENT GRANT[0002]This invention was made with United States government support awarded by the following agency: USDA. The United States has certain rights in this invention.FIELD[0003]Methods, systems and apparatuses herein provide a unique and novel process to remove H2S from biogas. In another embodiment, methods, systems, and apparatuses herein provide a process to remove H2S and CO2 from a biogas. Methods, systems and apparatuses disclosed herein provide an integrat...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & AuthorityApplications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C10L3/08C07C7/11B01D53/14C02F3/30C02F3/28
CPCC10L3/08C02F3/30C02F3/2866B01D53/1462C07C7/11C10L2290/06C02F2103/20B01D2251/2062C10L2290/26C10L2290/542C02F2101/101C02F3/2893C12M21/04C12M47/10C12M47/18Y02P20/145C05F17/15C05F17/40C05F17/50Y02E50/30Y02W30/40B01D53/62
InventorKENNEDY, NICHOLASZHAO, QUAN-BAOJIANG, ANPINGFREAR, CRAIGDVORAK, STEPHEN W.
OwnerKENNEDY NICHOLAS