Method and Apparatus for Making an Expanded Base Pier
a technology of base pier and expansion pier, which is applied in the direction of bulkheads/piles, foundation engineering, construction, etc., can solve the problems of not allowing for the additional stability and strength provided
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example i
[0036]As an example, an embodiment of the system of the present invention was used to install a support column, also described herein as an Expanded Base Pier (“EBP”), at a test site in Iowa. The test site was characterized by 4 feet of sandy lean clay underlain by sand. This testing program was designed to compare the load versus deflection characteristics of this embodiment of the EBP to reference piers constructed in successive lifts, such as a pier constructed by the tamper head driven mandrel method. The reference piers of this example had a nominal diameter of 20 inches and an installed length of 23 feet. One reference pier was constructed of aggregate only to a diameter of 20 inches. Another reference pier was constructed with a grout additive, commonly referred to as grouted pier, to a diameter of 14 inches.
[0037]In this embodiment of the invention, the EBP was formed by filling the extractable mandrel (FIG. 1) with a combination of open graded aggregate and fluid grout. The...
example ii
[0040]As another example, the system of another embodiment of the present invention was used to install five EBP elements at a test site in Virginia. The test site is characterized by hard clay. Prior to installation of the EBP, 30 inch diameter drill holes were excavated to a depth of 8 feet below the ground surface. The voids were then loosely backfilled with sand. The EBP elements of this example were formed within the backfilled holes.
[0041]In this embodiment of the invention, the EBP was formed by filling the mandrel described in FIG. 7 with concrete. The mandrel of this embodiment featured a “closed top” as opposed to the “open hopper” configuration as described with reference to Example I. The full mandrel was then advanced to a depth of 8 feet below the ground surface. The mandrel was then raised 3 feet, and then lowered 2 feet for three repetitions to create the expanded base. A process of raising the mandrel 3 feet, and then lowering 1 foot was then used to complete the fu...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


