Regional hospital and subject ranking method based on disease risk adjustment

Abstract

The invention discloses a regional hospital and subject ranking method based on disease risk adjustment. The method comprises the following steps of determining an individual performance indicator inperformance evaluation; dividing the individual performance indicator into an absolute value indicator and a relative value indicator; calculating and quantizing the absolute value indicator and the relative value indicator into scores according to different calculation methods; and acquiring the quantitative score of each individual performance indicator and ranking. By using a medical performance evaluation method, the key indicators of the various processes before, during and after disease treatment are fully considered, a clinical work ability and treatment result comparison and the like are comprehensively and integrally evaluated, and the impartiality and the fairness of an assessment result are effectively increased through an assessment after risk adjusting.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of smart medical care, in particular to a method for ranking regional hospitals and disciplines based on disease risk adjustment. Background technique [0002] Hospital management is an important part of medical insurance management. How to fully consider the impact of various factors on the key indicators of medical reform, establish a matching distribution model, and rationally analyze and evaluate the key performance indicators of medical reform are the main components of medical insurance work. The current medical performance evaluation method has the following problems: [0003] 1) It does not take into account the patient's own risk differences, disease classification and risk differences of complications, differences in treatment and surgical methods during clinical treatment, and other characteristics of regions and hospitals; [0004] 2) The classification and specific differences of medical performance ind...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] 1) It does not take into account the patient's own risk differences, disease classification and risk differences of complications, differences in treatment and surgical methods during clinical treatment, and other characteristics of regions and hospitals;

[0004] 2) The classification and specific differences of medical performance indicators are not considered;

[0005] 3) In the calculation of medical performance indicators, the influencing factors of medical performance indicators are not fully considered

[0006] Therefore, the commonly used evaluation methods of medical performance tend to be oriented to a single index for the evaluation tendency of hospitals or doctors, and cannot accurately feedback the overall situation of the hospital, which damages the fairness and fairness of the evaluation results.

Images