Supplier evaluation method based on quantifiable index system

Abstract

The invention discloses a supplier evaluation method based on a quantifiable index system. The supplier evaluation method comprises the steps of: determining evaluation indexes used for evaluating supplier levels based on actual service data, wherein the evaluation indexes comprise offer, quality, fulfillment, service, technology, finance and social responsibility; acquiring detailed data corresponding to actual services, and calculating to obtain an evaluation value of each evaluation index according to a preset algorithm; utilizing an entropy method to calculate weight corresponding to each evaluation index; and adopting a TOPSIS scoring method and a GRAY scoring method for scoring suppliers, and endowing different scoring coefficients for calculation to obtain TOPSIS and GRAY comprehensive evaluation results. Therefore, the supplier evaluation method based on the quantifiable index system can be used for constructing a reasonable and effective supplier evaluation index system, the evaluation can reach the degree of quantifiable calculation, and finally accurate and reliable evaluation of the suppliers is realized.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of data warehouses, in particular to a supplier evaluation method based on a quantifiable index system. Background technique [0002] With the emergence of advanced technology and management ideas, the issue of supplier evaluation has attracted the attention of academics and business circles. After extensive investigation and research from 1966 to 1990, Dickson listed more than 50 independent criteria. He believes that quality is A very important factor affecting supplier evaluation, 7 factors such as delivery and historical performance are quite important, and 14 factors such as following the quotation procedure and communication system are generally important; in 1991, based on Dickson's point of view, Charles proposed 23 items systematically In the later related research, it was found that price was the most discussed index, followed by delivery, quality, production capacity, technical ability, management...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] Although there are currently many evaluation indicators and corresponding methods for suppliers, and some evaluation indicators also have certain practical significance and can reflect some characteristics of suppliers to a certain extent, but for the actual application of enterprises, they still cannot achieve impressive results. degree of satisfaction

Therefore, in the process of implementing this application, the applicant found that there are at least the following deficiencies in the prior art: 1. At present, the evaluation points adopted by different researchers are scattered and there is no clear measurement standard for the index, so it is difficult to apply in practice; 2. , The current situation of supplier management in my country is that most of them rely on experience and subjective judgment to select suppliers. Even if there is a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system, there is still a lot of subjectivity when assigning weights to various indicators; 3. For suppliers There is no comprehensive and scientific standard for the evaluation and selection of core supply chain partners

Therefore, the current evaluation of suppliers cannot be accurate, reliable and practical.

Images