Evaluating workers in crowdsourcing environment

A technique for workers and jobs, applied in the field of evaluating workers in a crowdsourcing environment, can solve the problem of exhaustion of financial resources, no task owner to provide, etc.

Inactive Publication Date: 2017-02-22
MICROSOFT TECH LICENSING LLC
View PDF5 Cites 14 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] Among other pitfalls, the presence of low-quality work can quickly deplete the financial resources allocated by the task owner without providing any benefit to the task owner

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Evaluating workers in crowdsourcing environment
  • Evaluating workers in crowdsourcing environment
  • Evaluating workers in crowdsourcing environment

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0025] The disclosure is organized as follows. Section A describes illustrative functionality for evaluating the quality of work performed by workers in a crowdsourcing environment, which reflects a worker's propensity to perform work of the same quality in the future. Part B sets forth an illustrative method for explaining the operation of the functions of Part A. Section C sets out a sampling of representative characteristics that can be used to characterize the crowdsourcing environment. Section D describes illustrative computational functions that may be used to implement any aspect of the features described in Sections A-C.

[0026] As a preliminary matter, some of the figures describe concepts in the context of one or more structural components, which are variously referred to as functions, modules, features, elements or the like. The various components shown in the figures may be implemented in any manner by any physical and tangible mechanism, such as software runnin...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

A crowdsourcing environment is described herein which uses a single-stage or multi-stage approach to evaluate the quality of work performed by a worker, with respect to an identified task. In the multi-stage case, an evaluation system, in the first stage, determines whether the worker corresponds to a spam agent. In a second stage, for a non-spam worker, the evaluation system determines the propensity of the worker to perform desirable (e.g., accurate) work in the future. The evaluation system operates based on a set of features, including worker-focused features (which describe work performed by the particular worker), task-focused features (which describe tasks performed in the crowdsourcing environment), and system-focused features (which describe aspects of the configuration of the crowdsourcing environment). According to one illustrative aspect, the evaluation system performs its analysis using at least one model, produced using any type of supervised machine learning technique.

Description

Background technique [0001] A computer-implemented crowdsourcing system operates by distributing task instances to a population of human workers and then collecting workers' responses to the task. In some cases, the crowdsourcing system may reward the worker for his or her individual contributions on behalf of the entity sponsoring or "owning" the task. For example, the crowdsourcing system may give each worker a small amount of money for each task he or she completes. [0002] Crowdsourcing systems do not provide direct oversight of the work performed by their workers. The crowdsourcing system may also impose no restrictions (or minimal restrictions) on the workers who are allowed to work on the tasks. As a result, the quality of work performed by different workers may vary. Some workers are diligent and perform high quality responses. Other workers provide lower quality work to varying degrees. Indeed, at one end of the quality spectrum, some workers may correspond to s...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): G06Q10/06G06Q10/10
CPCG06Q10/063118G06Q10/1053G06Q10/06395G06Q50/01
Inventor S·E·K·伊甸R·M·帕特尔S·J·R·谢尔福德H·吴D·A·莫尔纳E·J·霍维茨
Owner MICROSOFT TECH LICENSING LLC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products