High-altitude escape device

Abstract

A high-altitude escape device, mainly composed of a hollow spherical airbag and an inflatable device. The outer shell and the inner shell are connected by a connecting rope to form a closed inflatable space. The outer shell and the inner shell are set at the same position and can be pulled apart from the outside and the inside. After the person enters, pull up the inner and outer zippers respectively, and then activate the explosive inflatable device to inflate, so that the person is surrounded by an inflated spherical space, and the person hidden in the ball can be protected when falling from a high altitude, and will not seriously injured.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a high-altitude escape device, which belongs to high-altitude escape technology. Background technique [0002] When people are in a dangerous situation at a higher position and need to escape, such as a high-rise building, they often have to take a risk and escape downward, or escape upward to a higher position to wait for rescue. In addition, escape can also be achieved through ladders, ropes or even helicopters. Escape by helicopter is usually unrealistic. One is that the cost of rescue is too high, and the other is that it is limited by the rescue environment and the number of people who can be rescued each time is small. If adopting the way of aerial ladder to rescue, there are following disadvantages: first, the height of aerial ladder is limited, the existing buildings are often more than 100 meters, and the height of aerial ladder cannot rise to higher floors; second, the traffic capacity of aerial ladder is limited, an...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

It is usually unrealistic to escape by helicopter. First, the cost of rescue is too high. Second, it is limited by the rescue environment and the number of people who can be rescued each time is small.

If adopting the way of aerial ladder to rescue, there are following disadvantages: first, the height of aerial ladder is limited, the existing buildings are often more than 100 meters, and the height of aerial ladder cannot rise to higher floors; second, the traffic capacity of aerial ladder is limited, and the rescue speed is relatively slow , thirdly, it will be restricted by erection and access to the site, and fourthly, the reaction speed is slow, and the site cannot be reached in time

The simplest and most practical way is to use a rope to escape, but this method has the following disadvantages: one is that the rope is difficult to fix, and the other is that the climbing process is relatively difficult. Usually people have not received similar professional training in climbing, and they are easy to fall. Next, the third is that when the flames of the fire leap out of the building, they may also burn the rope or burn the escape personnel.

[0003] Therefore, although people are trapped in many cases, they can only choose to passively wait for rescue.

Images