University subject assessment method and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a university subject assessment method. The method comprises the following steps: selecting a first-level subject of the Ministry of Education as a subject to be assessed; creating a university subject evaluation system of the to be assessed, wherein the university subject assessment system comprises a teacher and resource assessment module, a talent training assessment module, a scientific research assessment module and a social reputation assessment module; assessment weight is set on the teacher and resource assessment module, the talent training assessment module, the scientific research assessment module and the social reputation evaluation module according to the subject to be assessed; based on the university subject evaluation system, collecting data of the subject to be assessed inside and outside the school; the subject to be assessed is accessed according to the subject assessment system after the assessment weight is set and the collected data. The development condition of the university subject can be comprehensively considered in combination with the data in the university, multi-level and deep analysis is performed on the university subject, and the comprehensive competitiveness of the university subject is effectively improved.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the field of subject evaluation, in particular to a method and system for subject evaluation in colleges and universities. Background technique [0002] At present, the following problems generally exist in the discipline construction of colleges and universities: (1) It is difficult to track the dynamics. Since the data of discipline construction indicators are scattered in various business departments, and the school does not have a special discipline system, it is impossible to monitor the development status of disciplines in real time. (2) The data quality is not high. Due to the absence of uniform matching rules, subject data is not standardized, and scientific research output is a key indicator for judging the level of discipline construction. At present, colleges and universities still use teachers to fill in the statistics of scientific research output, which is not only time-consuming and laborious, but also prone to ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0002] At present, the following problems generally exist in the discipline construction of colleges and universities: (1) It is difficult to track the dynamics;

Since the subject construction index data are scattered in various business departments, and the school does not have a special subject system, it is impossible to monitor the status quo of subject development in real time

(2) Data quality is not high

At present, most of the existing data in colleges and universities are wide-caliber statistical data, and third-party statistical data often cannot focus on disciplines, and it is difficult to accurately and scientifically evaluate the level of disciplines

(4) Subject evaluation is difficult

Due to the complex business logic of subject evaluation and the lack of specialized subject evaluation systems and tools, it is difficult for schools to conduct subject self-evaluation

[0003] At present, first-class disciplines are mainly evaluated based on crawled public data, not combined with school data, and the number of evaluation indicators is relatively small, which is mainly biased towards scientific research, without taking into account the impact of personnel training, teaching staff and social services on discipline construction. influences

Images