Process for the preparation of substituted imidazoquinoline
A technology of compounds and solvates, applied in the field of imidazoquinoline derivatives, can solve the problem that the clinical proof of concept of TLR7 agonists is yet to be determined, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0184] Embodiment 1-use the method of the present invention to synthesize N-(4-(4-amino-2-(2-methoxyethyl)-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-1-yl)butyl)-N-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)acetamide
[0185] Step a): providing a compound of formula (3)
[0186] Compound 1 (1 eq), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.05 eq) and toluene (10 vol) were charged to the reactor. After addition of 1,1,1,3-tetramethoxypropane (1.2 equiv), the contents of the reactor were adjusted to reflux at about 95°C and the content of compound 1 was monitored using HPLC.
[0187] Step b): preparing the compound of formula (4)
[0188] When the content of Compound 1 drops to ≤1.0% area of the initial area (determined by HPLC), adjust the contents of the reactor to 10 °C to 15 °C and add 6N HCl (5 vol) to the reactor over about 1 h , so as to maintain the temperature ≤ 25 ℃. The contents of the reactor were stirred at 20°C to 25°C for at least 2 hours and the reaction was monitored for completion by HPLC....
Embodiment 2
[0209] Example 2 - Comparative synthesis of N-(4-(4-amino-2-(2-methoxyethane) using a chromatographic purification step (comparative method B) Base)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-1-yl)butyl)-N-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)acetamide
[0210] N-(4-(4-amino-2-(2-methoxyethyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-1-yl)butyl)-N-(tetrahydro- 2H-pyran-4-yl)acetamide according to Figure 11 prepared by the method shown in , which is similar to the method of the present invention, but which uses 3 chromatographic purification steps (one after removal of the Boc protecting group; one after reaction with tetrahydropyrone; and one after amine oxide after transformation). The overall yield of Comparative Method B, the amount of compound of formula (I) produced by the method and the time required for the synthesis are given in Table 6 below.
[0211] Table 6
[0212] Method of the invention Comparison Method B total yield 31% 11% Chromatographic purification 0 3 amount...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


