Attorney Terminal Having Outline Preparation Capabilities For Managing Trial Proceedings

Abstract

The present invention provides attorney terminals which operate using an outline for storing, associating and managing case evidence, case law and work product for a given lawsuit at issue. Accessed through attorney terminals, the outline is structured based on a hierarchical categorization of the lawsuit into the law and fact at issue. Associated with each categorization entry in the hierarchical outline are groupings of case law, case evidence, relevance and draft discovery information for rapid access by the attorney. Each categorization entry in the tailored outline provides instant access to case law via headnotes, treatise selections, seminal cases, and preset searches. The disclosed invention also automatically: 1) tracks the use of Exhibits in a proceeding; 2) generates draft portions of a pretrial order including jury instructions; and 3) generates time-lines for analysis and use during a proceeding. Draft interrogatories, document requests and deposition or trial questions are also provided.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] This invention relates to a down-line transcription system used by attorneys for reviewing real-time transcription during a proceeding such as a trial or deposition; and, more particularly, it relates to a method and apparatus for interactively preparing an outline for use during such a proceeding based on case evidence and case law which may be locally or remotely located. [0002] As is well known, legal proceedings such as a deposition or trial involve the participation of, among others, an examining attorney who asks questions and a witness who must answer (“testify”) while under oath. To prepare for such proceedings, the examining attorney must review the applicable case law and the related case evidence. The attorney also consults experts, clients and other associate attorneys regarding specific issues of law and fact as proves necessary. During his investigation process the attorney takes notes, and makes copies of documents and legal cases re...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

The entire preparation process often proves to be very time consuming and cyclical in nature.

However, neither the examining attorney nor the defending attorney can anticipate everything.

However, during the proceeding, because the attorneys do not have the luxury of time, outlining, legal researching, and factual evidence retrieval prove to be an impossibility.

Because of disorganization, the attorney is often unable to use a great deal of the prepared information.

In complex litigation, the problems facing the attorneys are compounded.

Because the preparation process becomes a very time consuming task, the lead examining (and defending) attorney delegates the task to an associate attorney on the case.

Because of lesser knowledge and inexperience, the associate attorney either over prepares or else complicates the matter by not culling out the appropriate law or facts.

In addition, because the associate attorney must brief the lead attorney during a relatively short time period before the proceeding, the lead attorney cannot grasp all of what is attempted to be conveyed.

Similarly, the associate attorney may convey a misconstrued understanding of the law and the evidence because of inexperience.

Either way, the lead attorney often does not find out all he needs until the proceeding is underway.

In the midst of the proceeding, the examining attorney is also confronted with the problem of recalling the testimony of former witnesses regarding the same subject matter now being addressed.

Also, after the deposition, the attorney is faced with the problem of reorganizing the materials in some type of saveable form for later use when a similar witness is deposed.

Images