Finger tab
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Example
[0040]FIG. 5 is another comparative finger tab (303) C. Example C is analogous to previous example B, but the dimensions of the linkages (309A-309E) and perforations (333, 390A-390D, 344) of the second perforation line (342) are different. The first and second ½ cut lines of weakness (311, 312) are analogous to those of the invention (of FIG. 2). However, notably there is neither a first intersection nor a second intersection. The first perforation line (341) is essentially a single perforation in the middle ⅓ of first perforation line (341) and a linkage (307A, 307B) on either side of the first perforation line (341). The second perforation line (341) has a total of six perforations (333, 390A-390D, 344) each about 4 mm in length (measured along the arc) and a total of five linkages (309A-309E) in-between these perforations each of about 2 mm in length (vs. 1 mm comparatively to example B). Results indicate that users (through consumer testing) are not able to easily push into the ...
Example
[0041]FIG. 6 is another comparative finger tab (403) D. Example D neither has a first intersection nor a second intersection. The first (linear) perforation line (441) and the second (arced) perforation line (442) fail to intersect with each other and fail to intersect with the respective ½ cut lines of weakness (411, 412). There is about a 1 mm gap on either end of the first perforation line (441) to otherwise intersecting either respective end of the second perforation line (442). Furthermore, the first and second ½ cut lines of weakness (411, 412) are also each have about 1 mm gap to otherwise intersect either respective end of the second perforation line (442). The first perforation line (441) has a total of six perforations (421, 470A-470D, 422) each of about 2.8 mm in length, and a total of five linkages (407A-407E) in-between each about 2 mm in length. The second (arced) perforation line (442) has a total five perforations (433, 490A-490C, 444) each about 5.2 mm in length (al...
Example
[0043]FIG. 8 is another comparative finger tab (603) F. Example F neither has a first intersection nor a second intersection. The first (linear) perforation line (641) fails to intersection the second (arced) perforation line (642). There is about a 1 mm gap on either end of the first perforation line (641) to otherwise intersecting either respective end of the second perforation line (642). Furthermore, the first and second ½ cut lines of weakness (611, 612) are also each have about 1 mm gap to otherwise intersect either respective end of the second perforation line (642). The first perforation line (641) has a total of six perforations (621, 670A-670D, 622) each of about 2.8 mm in length, and a total of five linkages (607A-607E) in-between each 2 mm in length. The second (arced) perforation line (642) has a total six perforations (633, 690A-690D, 644) each of about 4 mm in length (along the arc), and a total of five linkages (609A-609E) in-between, each 2 mm in length (along the a...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap