Novel lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis isolate wflu-12 and use thereof
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 2
rial Activity Test
[0059]The antibacterial activity against fish pathogens was tested using the cross-streak method, and the results are shown in Table 2 and FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, the antibacterial activity was confirmed in A. salmonicida (0.4 cm), S. iniae (1 cm), S. parauberis (1.1 cm), V ichthyoenteri (0.4 cm).
TABLE 2Antimicrobial activityaSource ofAeromonasEdwardsiellaPhotobacteriumStreptococcusStreptococcusVibrioVibrioSpeciesisolationsalmonicidatardadamselaeiniaeparauberisanguillarumichthyoenteriIsolates obtainedfrom fish gut*Lc. lactisOlive +++−++++++++WFLUJ2flounderReference strains*Lc. lactisEarthworm +++−−−++KCTC 3899Intestine*Lc. lactisMilk+−−−−−−ATCC 19435*Lc. lactisLeaf +−−−−−−ATCC 29071hopper*Lc. lactisRaw milk−−−−−−−ATCC 19257KCTC: Korean Collection for Type Culture;ATCC: American Type Culture Collection;*Inhibition zone (mm): ++++ = 16-20 mm; +++ = 11-15 mm; ++ = 6-10 mm; + = 1-5 mm; − = no inhibition*The results were recorded using both cross-streaking method and agar we...
example 3
Exclusion Activity
[0063]The following test was carried out having a flounder fed with a general compound feed as a control group and a flounder fed with a feed to which WFLU-12 probiotic was added as an experimental group (probiotic).
[0064]After orally infected with Streptococcus parauberis, the numbers of bacteria in the intestinal and renal tissues were compared (FIG. 5). The average value of Streptococcus parauberis in the intestine and kidney was significantly lower in both week 2 and week 4 of the experimental group as compared with the control group. Therefore, it can be confirmed that the isolate WFLU-12 of the present invention has a function of inhibiting the invasion of streptococcal pathogens. In FIG. 5, the arrows show a significant exclusion of pathogen colonization and invasion in the fish of the experimental group. ((*) and (**) indicate the statistical significance as compared with the control group, which are p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively. The same applies to all ...
example 4
in Innate Immune Response
[0066]FIG. 6 shows the result of measuring phagocytotic activity and respiratory explosive activity by separating the head from the body in the pilot-scale prey test. The experimental group shows a significantly higher activity at week 2 and week 4, respectively. In FIG. 6, each bar represents an average value for 10 fish and shows a standard error.
[0067]FIG. 7 shows the result of comparing the pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in the experimental group and the control group. From the top, the expression of IL-6 and IL-1β in the intestine, and the expression of IL-6, g-lysozyme, IL-8 and IFN-γ in the kidney were compared, and as a result, it was confirmed that the isolate WFLU-12 induced an increase in the pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and induced an increase in IL-6, IL-8, INF-γ and g-lysozyme in the kidney and an increase in IL-6 in the intestine. Each bar represents an average value for 10 fish and shows a standard error.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Length | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Length | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


