Project review management system

Abstract

The invention discloses a project review management system, which comprises a client used for reporting a project review application, uploading to-be-reviewed project data, perfecting submission dataand reporting closing-in data; an auditing terminal used for summarizing and adjusting the review plan, publishing a monthly review plan, distributing projects, pre-reviewing data, reviewing projects,auditing closing-in data, forming review opinions and evaluating design quality; and a superior auditing terminal used for formulating auditing and reviewing requirements. According to the system, the whole process management from review plan publishing to review opinion issuing is realized. The project design review quality and efficiency are greatly improved. The project design and investment control are efficiently and accurately guided.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a software system, in particular to a project review management system for power system engineering. Background technique [0002] With the gradual deepening of the management system of "Three Sets and Five Majors", State Grid, provincial and municipal management units at all levels put forward higher requirements for lean and standardized management of design review, cost evaluation and analysis; and the scope of design review business is also determined by infrastructure projects. , extended to various project types such as productive technical overhaul, marketing, small infrastructure, non-productive technical overhaul, etc. [0003] With the expansion of the scope of review, the number of projects has expanded geometrically. While the scope of review is expanding, the number of project reviewers cannot be increased accordingly in a timely manner. Therefore, the only way to carry out the review work is through flexible revi...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

While the scope of the review is expanding, the number of project reviewers cannot be increased accordingly in a timely manner. Therefore, the only way to carry out the review work is through flexible review methods. The reviewers work overtime every day, sacrificing the number and progress of reviews to barely support

[0004] On the other hand, with the gradual deepening of the management system of "Three Collections and Five Majors" and the gradual strengthening and deepening of the requirements for building a strong smart grid, the State Grid, provincial and municipal management units at all levels are leaning in design review, cost evaluation and analysis, etc. Higher requirements have also been put forward for standardized management; the mode of conducting review work solely by relying on the personal skills and experience of reviewers has become increasingly unable to meet the new normal requirements of the "three sets and five majors" management system

Images