Strong dominant rape combination
A technology of strong superiority combination and preparation method, applied in the fields of botanical equipment and methods, application, plant gene improvement, etc., can solve the problems of small genetic difference, weak heterosis, and difficulty in obtaining new hybrid varieties with strong superiority, etc. Large genetic distance, the effect of broadening the gene pool
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0014] In 1999, a new material of Brassica oleracea K06 was obtained by crossing the yellow-seed line C108 of Brassica oleracea with the yellow-seed line y146 of Chinese cabbage-type rapeseed, culturing immature embryos, and artificially doubling; Hybridization of Brassica oleracea-type yellow-seed rape line SH23. The F1 generation was planted at the same density in the field for observation. In January 2003, 5 plants were taken to measure the fresh weight and dry weight of the plants. Compared with the common cabbage-type yellow-seed hybrid combination, the average fresh weight per plant was higher than that of the control 110%, and the average dry weight per plant was 73% higher than that of the control group; in May 2003, the grains were harvested by plots and tested on a single plant, and the yield of the plots was 37% higher than that of the control combination.
Embodiment 2
[0016] In 1999, a new material of Brassica oleracea K08 was obtained by crossing the yellow-seed line C108 of Brassica oleracea with the yellow-seed line y189 of Chinese cabbage-type rapeseed, culturing immature embryos and artificially doubling; Hybridization of Brassica napus line SH86, F1 generation planted at the same density in the field for observation, 10 plants were taken in January 2004 to measure the fresh weight and dry weight of the plants, compared with common cabbage-type yellow-seed hybrid combinations, the average fresh weight per plant was higher than that of the control 154%, and the average dry weight per plant was 79% higher than that of the control group; in May 2004, the grains were harvested by plots and tested on a single plant, and the yield of the plots was 42% higher than that of the control combination.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More