A Modeling Method for Complex Equipment System

Abstract

The invention discloses a modeling method of a complex equipment system. According to the method, the analysis of the complex equipment system is defined; the activities, the specifications and the interfaces of each link, and adopted models and views are designed; the design efficiency is improved, and the design quality is guaranteed; the concurrent design of the system can be performed by a design team orderly and effectively.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a modeling method, in particular to a modeling method of a complex equipment system. Background technique [0002] In recent years, in order to cope with the increasingly fierce competition and challenges of globalization, all walks of life are improving their competitiveness through continuous strategic adjustments, business reorganizations, and management reforms. The traditional system engineering method emphasizes the system construction method based on functional decomposition, which cannot meet the needs of continuous improvement of the system business process. In recent years, although the use-case-driven, domain-oriented, and component-based system design and development ideas have become more and more popular, which has alleviated the contradiction to a certain extent, how to dynamically support business reorganization, extract system functions from business requirements, and implement functions and components? Seamle...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

Such a result ignores business requirements, resulting in a disconnect between business requirements and system design, directly affecting the design quality of the model

[0006] 2. System reuse efficiency is low

The development trend of the equipment system is based on the common business process as the center and starting point. Although the traditional equipment-based system construction method can support system reuse at the component level, the system upgrade efficiency is low and the cycle is long due to the granularity of reuse.

[0007] 3. It is difficult to continuously optimize the model, and does not fully support parallel iterative design

Although the traditional use-case-driven method supports iterative design, it is mainly based on use cases and is out of touch with the business process, resulting in the division of labor and overlapping of design teams in different fields. The quality of the designed system model is poor, and continuous optimization cannot be performed.

[0008] 4. Lack of consistency checks between models

Traditional system modeling methods start directly from requirement analysis and build multiple views separately. The lack of correlation between views leads to design defects such as model inconsistency

[0009] 5. Human-computer interaction design is decentralized

Different businesses in the system are often designed and developed by different teams, resulting in inconsistent display and operation styles

[0010] 6. It is difficult to realize the dynamic reorganization of business process functions

Existing equipment system design methods require relatively stable system functions and do not support dynamic reorganization of business process functions

Images