Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Negotiation trust rule logic property analyzing and processing method

A technology of analysis, processing and negotiating parties, applied in the field of communication, can solve the problems of trust rule analysis, lack of theoretical basis and in-depth research, mutual relationship of trust rules, and poor use of logical properties, etc., to protect privacy and solve problems The effect of building trust

Inactive Publication Date: 2016-03-23
SHANGHAI DIANJI UNIV
View PDF0 Cites 0 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

Although researchers have done a lot of work on conflict detection, for example, in 2006, someone tried to use the 0-1 table to describe trust rules, but did not provide relevant theoretical basis and in-depth research
In addition, in 2007, someone proposed a linear description and analysis of trust rules in 2007, but this is more for theoretical research and is not easy to implement
In 2008, someone proposed to describe trust rules in matrix form from the perspective of algorithm implementation, but it cannot be flexibly changed and expanded according to the requirements of the application environment.
[0003] In general, these methods of describing and analyzing the trust rules of negotiation fail to analyze the trust rules before the negotiation, and the mutual relationship and logical nature of the trust rules have not been well utilized, and cannot affect the progress of the negotiation process and the establishment of trust. , and even further have a very good guiding role in the formulation and improvement of trust rules

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Negotiation trust rule logic property analyzing and processing method
  • Negotiation trust rule logic property analyzing and processing method
  • Negotiation trust rule logic property analyzing and processing method

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0017] In order to make the content of the present invention clearer and easier to understand, the content of the present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with specific embodiments and accompanying drawings.

[0018] For ease of understanding, the following first introduces the basic grammatical structure of the logical description of trust rules.

[0019] The syntax symbols involved in trust rules are:

[0020] Propositional variables: s,c 1 ,c 2 ,...,c n , where s represents the corresponding resource, and c i Indicates a certificate. Especially sometimes s can also be regarded as a certificate.

[0021] Propositional constants: true, false, respectively indicating that the certificate can be disclosed unconditionally or never.

[0022] Connectives in the body of the rule: ∧, ∨, Represents a logical AND, OR, and inverse operation between certificate variables.

[0023] Left and right brackets: (,).

[0024] Dependent operation symbols of r...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The invention provides a negotiation trust rule logic property analyzing and processing method. If a participant of trust negotiation negotiates with a first negotiation party and a second negotiation party respectively, and a first trust rule set between the participant and the first negotiation party and a second trust rule set between the participant and the second negotiation party are equivalent in grammar, negotiation between the participant and the first negotiation party and negotiation between the participant and the second negotiation party are processed to be mutually derivable.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to the communication field, and more specifically, the present invention relates to a method for analyzing and processing logical properties of negotiation trust rules. Background technique [0002] In traditional trust negotiation, after the trust rules are formulated by both parties, they are directly used to organize the negotiation. However, there may be interrelationships between the trust rules of both parties, and the trust rules themselves are also of a logical nature. In traditional trust negotiation, there is no process of trust rule conflict detection before the negotiation, and the negotiating parties directly organize the negotiation according to the negotiated trust rules they have formulated. Although researchers have done a lot of work on conflict detection, for example, in 2006, someone tried to use 0-1 table to describe trust rules, but no relevant theoretical basis and in-depth research were provided. ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): G06N5/04
CPCG06N5/046
Inventor 夏冬梅
Owner SHANGHAI DIANJI UNIV