A method for evaluating digital printing definition of a silk fabric
A technology of digital printing and evaluation methods, applied in image data processing, instruments, calculations, etc., can solve the problems of high customer recognition rate, color block noise, unstable evaporation, etc., to achieve accurate clarity and clarity evaluation. Effect
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0083] combine Figure 1 to Figure 13 Describe this embodiment in detail. The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the clarity of digital printing of silk fabrics, including printing positive lines, negative lines, circles, gradient strips and complex images on the selected silk fabrics, using positive lines, negative lines, circles, and gradient strips, using There is no reference image quality evaluation method for objective evaluation, and the printed complex patterns are subjectively evaluated.
[0084] Modulate printing ink, print positive lines, negative lines, circles, gradient strips and complex images on silk fabrics; print positive lines and negative lines in the warp and weft directions of silk fabrics, and the number of positive lines and negative lines is 11. The length of the line is not less than 1.27mm; the color of the gradient bar printed along the vertical direction is blue, pink, yellow and black.
[0085] In this embodiment, the selected ...
Embodiment 2
[0132] combine Figures 12 to 19 , a method for evaluating the clarity of digital printing of silk fabrics involved in this embodiment will be described in detail. The difference between the present embodiment and the first embodiment is that the printed positive lines, negative lines, circles, and gradient bars are objectively evaluated by a non-reference image quality evaluation method, and the evaluation method adopted is the gray scale variance algorithm.
[0133] The formula of the gray variance algorithm is:
[0134]
[0135]
[0136] in, is the mean value of the gray value of the image, s is the variance of the gray value of the image, and f(x, y) represents the gray value at point (x, y) of the image.
Embodiment 3
[0138] to combine Figure 12 , 13 and Figure 20-25 , a method for evaluating the clarity of digital printing of silk fabrics involved in this embodiment will be described in detail. The difference between this embodiment and Embodiment 1 is that, for the printed yang lines, yin lines, circles, and gradient bars, a non-reference image quality evaluation method is used for objective evaluation, and the evaluation method adopted is the area energy algorithm.
[0139] The area energy algorithm is to calculate the sum of the absolute values of the gray value differences of four adjacent diagonal pixels, and its formula is:
[0140]
[0141] In the formula, M and N are the width and height of the image respectively; f(x, y) represents the gray value of point (x, y) in the image; s is the calculation result of the area energy algorithm.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Length | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


