A comprehensive quantitative evaluation method and system for student management

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of management systems, and particularly discloses a comprehensive quantitative evaluation method for student management. The method comprises the steps ofcarrying out the collection and quantification of each behavior of a student, and obtaining a quantification result of each behavior; integrating and summarizing the quantification results, and storing the quantification results in a shared database of a shared server; collecting and extracting quantization results related to students from a shared database server, further integrating and summarizing the quantization results, carrying out assessment evaluation according to assessment index pairs, and storing assessment evaluation data for query and management. The invention also discloses a comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for student management. According to the student management comprehensive quantitative evaluation method provided by the invention, the subjectivity and theobjectivity can be distinguished, so that the evaluation can be refined and quantized to achieve comprehensive evaluation. In addition, during evaluation, all evaluation reference data can be rapidlyand effectively gathered and integrated through tools, and the interference of factors such as manual statistics is avoided.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to the technical field of management systems, in particular to a comprehensive quantitative evaluation method for student management and a comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for student management. Background technique [0002] A comprehensive quantitative assessment system is the process of systematically collecting and synthesizing various types of assessment information for the purpose of demonstrating the value of a particular program of education. To be more specific, comprehensive quantitative evaluation is a thorough and strict inspection and research on the evaluation object, and it is an important means of education management. [0003] Quantitative evaluation is a relatively macroscopic concept, which determines its uncertain side. If you pay too much attention to the specific level, you will inevitably ignore the overall grasp, and thus come up with one-sided or even extreme views or indicators; other 2. The ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0003] Quantitative evaluation is a relatively macroscopic concept, which determines its uncertain side. If you pay too much attention to the specific level, you will inevitably ignore the overall grasp, and thus come up with one-sided or even extreme views or indicators; other 2. The evaluation system is the product of a specific social phenomenon and abstract social fact research. Therefore, while focusing on the integrity of the evaluation criteria and index system, it has gone to another extreme, replacing the subjective with simple objective scores. The qualitative role simplifies the quantitative evaluation, which leads to the fact that its research conclusions cannot objectively and truly reflect the value of education; third, it pays too much attention to the aspect of quantitative management, while ignoring or partially ignoring the aspect of in-depth grasp of quality

[0004] Therefore, the lack of a clear enough understanding of the above problems has led to the inevitability that the research conclusions of the evaluation criteria and index system tend to be superficial and simplistic

As a result, the system design appears: first, the evaluation is mainly based on the qualitative judgment of personal subjective experience, and the content of quantitative evaluation is less, so it is difficult to judge the difference; Based on the support, and there is an information island problem in the evaluation data, it is easy to make the evaluation inaccurate because the data cannot be unified in time; the third is that the subjective and the objective are mixed, and the evaluation is not detailed and quantified enough to achieve a comprehensive evaluation; the fourth is the limitation In addition, when evaluating and evaluating, there is a lack of fast and effective tools for summarizing and integrating various evaluation reference data, so as to avoid the interference of artificial statistics and other factors

Images