Novel rheumatoid arthritis disease marking system and application
A rheumatoid and arthritis technology, applied in the field of rheumatoid arthritis disease scoring system, can solve the palm and finger joints affecting the four paws, evaluate the occurrence, course, nursing, treatment, and Other intervention barriers, the incidence of facet joints and the severity of the disease are not included in the score, so as to achieve the effect of sensitive evaluation
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0039] Using the existing scoring system, the limbs of each animal were scored separately: 0 = normal; 1 = mild arthritis, lesions limited to the paw facet joints (finger and toe joints); 2 = moderate arthritis, lesions involved Small and large joints (elbow, knee); 3 = severe arthritis, lesions involving large and small joints, limited movement; 4 = limited movement, difficulty eating, trunk or distal limb paralysis. The disease score of each animal is the sum of the scores of the four limbs, and the average value of each group of animals is drawn in a graph (see appendix figure 1 ).
[0040] Using the scoring system of the present invention, the above-mentioned 64 joints of each animal are scored, and the disease score of each animal is equal to the sum of the scores of all the above-mentioned joints, and the average value of each group of animals is used to draw a curve (see the appendix figure 2 ).
[0041]Two-way RM ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests data statistics meth...
Embodiment 2
[0059] The inventor also adopted another data statistics method, One-way RM ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post-tests, to further compare the scoring results of the scoring system of the present invention with the existing scoring system.
[0060] 1) Comparison of scoring results of existing scoring systems
[0061] mean difference q value Significance (P result Control group and model group -4.563 7.181 yes *** Control group and treatment group -2.125 3.344 yes * Administration group and model group -2.438 3.836 yes *
[0062] *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
[0063] 2) Comparison of scoring system scoring results of the present invention
[0064] mean difference q value Significance (P result Control group and model group -32.81 5.546 Yes ** Control group and treatment group -6.875 1.162 no ns Administration group and model group -25.94 4.384 Yes **
...
Embodiment 3
[0069] The recorded data generated by the scoring system of the present invention can also be analyzed separately for the proximal finger joint PIP disease score. Since the main lesion of rheumatoid arthritis involves the little finger joint such as the proximal finger joint PIP, the disease of this joint is simply analyzed. Score analysis, while greatly reducing the workload, can still accurately monitor the development of rheumatoid joint disease and provide an accurate and reliable scientific basis for the efficacy evaluation of the drug to be tested. However, the existing scoring system is due to the amount of information However, the limitations of this method are that it is not possible to derive disease score data for specific joints such as PIP.
[0070] The 20 PIP joints of each animal are scored, and the disease score of each animal is equal to the sum of the scores of all the above-mentioned PIP joints, and the average value of each group of animals is used to draw a...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 