A kind of bacillus subtilis and application thereof
A technology of Bacillus subtilis, preservation number, applied in the application, bacteria, microorganisms and other directions, can solve the problem of reducing the activity of microbial feed additives
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0022] Embodiment 1 chicken farm test
[0023] In this experiment, 480 31-week-old Hai-Line brown layer hens were randomly divided into two groups, 240 in the control group and 240 in the test group, and the test period was 21 days. Test diet: 61.5% corn, 23.4% soybean meal, 2% wheat bran, 8.1% stone powder, 5% compound premix, no health-care antibiotics were fed during the test.
[0024] The test group added 0.1‰ microbial feed additives to the feed during the test period. The microbial feed additive consists of 1.0% Bacillus subtilis (the preservation number is CCTCC M2016442, and the number of viable bacteria is 1.0×10 9 cfu / g) and 99.0% glucose are evenly mixed. The control group did not add bacteria, and other feeding conditions were the same.
[0025] The test results are as follows:
[0026] project egg weight(g) Egg production rate (%) Broken egg rate (%) Egg rate (%) Daily Consumption (g) feed-to-egg ratio control group 63.4±1.25 87.3±4...
Embodiment 2
[0028] Embodiment 2 microbial feed additive
[0029] 1% preservation number is the Bacillus subtilis of CCTCC M2016442 (viable bacteria number is 1.0×10 9 cfu / g), 0.1% of the preservation number is CCTCC M 2016440 Bacillus coagulans (the number of live bacteria is 1.0×10 8 cfu / g), 1% Saccharomyces cerevisiae (from Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., the number of viable bacteria is 5.0×10 7 CFU / g), mixed with 97.9% glucose evenly.
Embodiment 3
[0030] Embodiment 3 fattening pig feeding test
[0031] In a pig farm, 6 pens of fattening pigs were randomly selected as test objects, with about 70 pigs in each pen. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pens were the control group, and the 4th, 5th, and 6th pens were the test groups. During the test, 200g of microbial additives were added per ton of feed.
[0032] The test group used the microbial feed additive formulated in Example 2.
[0033] The control group uses 0.1% of Bacillus coagulans with the preservation number CCTCC M 2016440 (the number of viable bacteria is 1.0×10 8 cfu / g), 1% Saccharomyces cerevisiae (from Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., the number of viable bacteria is 5.0×10 7 CFU / g), and a microbial additive made by mixing 98.9% glucose.
[0034] The test time was 30 days in total, during which the aureomycin, acidulant and sweetener for health care were removed.
[0035]
[0036] As can be seen from the table in Example 3, the fattening pigs were fed for 30 days, and the a...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com