A kind of layout method of tourist highway service facilities camp
A technology for service facilities and camps, applied in data processing applications, instruments, calculations, etc., can solve the problems of low overall utilization of camp resources and achieve the effects of improving overall utilization, easy operation, and resource saving
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
specific Embodiment approach 1
[0015] Specific implementation mode one: the specific process of a camp layout method for tourist highway service facilities in this implementation mode is as follows:
[0016] Step 1: Establish an evaluation index system for the layout of tourist camps;
[0017] Step 2: Use the AHP method to determine the weight of each evaluation index;
[0018] Step 3: Determine the importance of the candidate camp node;
[0019] Step 4: Determine the optimal number of tourist camp layouts based on Step 3.
specific Embodiment approach 2
[0020] Specific implementation mode two: the difference between this implementation mode and specific implementation mode one is that in the step one, an evaluation index system for the layout of tourist camps is established; the specific process is:
[0021] In order to scientifically and objectively evaluate the layout plan of tourist camps, several aspects, such as adaptability, coordination, economy, convenience, sociality and operability among the camps, should be considered comprehensively when establishing the evaluation index of tourist camp layout. Combined with the principle of comprehensiveness and operability in the selection of indicators, this paper selects four indicators: the tourism resource status of the tourist attraction (B1), the social status of the city where the scenic spot is located (B2), the traffic status of the scenic spot location (B3), and the construction feasibility status (B4). To evaluate the layout plan of the tourism road camp. The establis...
specific Embodiment approach 3
[0027] Embodiment 3: The difference between this embodiment and Embodiment 1 or 2 is that in the step 2, the AHP method is used to determine the weight of each evaluation index; the specific process is:
[0028] Step 21: For m evaluation indicators, record J={1,2,...,m} as a set of subscripts, compare any two indicators i and j to obtain the value of importance, and select according to the importance value to obtain the discriminant matrix A', A'=(aij)m×m; 1≤i≤m, 1≤j≤m;
[0029] In the formula: aij is the value of the importance degree obtained by comparing the index i and the index j;
[0030] Step 22: Normalize the discriminant matrix A′ to obtain the weight of each evaluation index The process is:
[0031] According to formula Find the weight
[0032] Among them, λ max (A') is the main eigenvalue of A', For the discriminant matrix A', the column vectors are first normalized, and then the row vectors are summed to obtain a column vector, and then the column vector...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap