Oropharyngeal Airway

Abstract

An oropharyngeal device for insertion into the mouth of a patient. The device includes a body having a distal end and a proximal end with a flange formed at the proximal end. The distal end of the body is inserted into the mouth of the patient until the flange at the proximal end is disposed outside and adjacent to the patient's mouth. The flange keeps the proximal device from entering the mouth. The body is sized such that the distal end of the body is disposed within the pharynx above the epiglottis. The device includes a channel through the body that forms an airway between its proximal and distal ends. The device also includes at least three separate conduits integrated into the body for administering oxygen, suctioning, and for assessing ventilation through end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. The conduits for oxygenation and suctioning extend through the body between its proximal and distal ends. The conduit for end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring extends along and is attached to a side wall of the channel and terminates within the channel.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] The present invention is related to and claims priority from co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 666,290 filed Sep. 19, 2003 and from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60 / 413,174, filed Sep. 14, 2002, both being incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The invention relates to establishing and maintaining an airway and, in particular, to an oropharyngeal device for establishing and maintaining an airway. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] The administration of anesthesia via a face mask technique usually requires continuous hands-on management. This is inconvenient during certain medical procedures that require access to the face because the face mask technique may obstruct access to the face. [0004] For example, access to the face may be necessary for ophthalmologic examination, radiation therapy, MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging), and CT (computed tomography) or CAT (comput...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

This is inconvenient during certain medical procedures that require access to the face because the face mask technique may obstruct access to the face.

If a mask is used to administer anesthesia during such procedures, access the patient's face may be hindered.

Further, in such circumstances, anesthesiologists often use awkward hand positioning to allow access to the face which then requires repeated manipulation of the mask to ensure a patent airway.

The administration of anesthesia via a face mask technique is also inconvenient when the anesthesiologist must be distant from the patient such as during radiation therapy, CT or CAT scans, and during MRIs.

Although the anesthesiologist may repeatedly instrument the trachea in such circumstances, the stimulation may result in irritation of the trachea especially when treatment is necessary on an on-going basis.

Repeated instrumentation during this on-going treatment will irritate the patient's trachea and may result in other adverse consequences such as a sore throat and loss of appetite due to the irritated trachea and hypopharynx.

Each of these solutions has its respective drawbacks especially during procedures such as radiation treatment where deep anesthetization is not necessary, where the patient breathes by himself and where treatment is on an on-going basis.

Thus, endotracheal intubation is not desirable for circumstances that do not require deep anesthetization.

Endotracheal intubation also subjects the patient to laryngoscopy for inserting the endotracheal tube and to tracheal irritation which makes it undesirable for circumstances requiring repeated instrumentation.

Intravenous techniques may obviate the use of inhalational agents, but still necessitate maintenance of a patent airway.

However, the LMA must be connected to a conventional anesthesia circuit, does not provide a mechanism for suctioning secretions, and requires technical facility for its insertion that may require adjunctive equipment for its application.

This stimulation is undesirable in circumstances requiring repeated instrumentation.

However, the COPA must be connected to a conventional anesthesia circuit or to an adapter to connect the COPA to an oxygen source and may cause the patient discomfort due to the inflated cuff.

Further, the COPA does not include a suctioning mechanism which may result in a medical procedure being interrupted in order for an anesthesiologist to suction the patient when secretions are building up.

Further, there is a need for such a device that is minimally stimulating to allow for repeated use during on-going treatments, that does not block access to the face of a patient, and that allows an anesthesiologist to be distant from the patient.

Images